On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 11:40:15PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Kconfig is tricky. We face a build error with CONFIG_BLOCK=n with
> UBIFS_FS_ENCRYPTION enabled.
> UBIFS file encryption does "select FS_ENCRYPTION" just like ext4 and f2fs.
> This will enable ENCRYPTION even when no block suppo
Ted,
Am 07.01.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:10:43PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
>>
>> I thought you're supposed to be able to build the kernel no matter how it's
>> configured. If this patch is really too large for 4.10 then perhaps we
>> should
>> make FS_ENCR
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:10:43PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
>
> I thought you're supposed to be able to build the kernel no matter how it's
> configured. If this patch is really too large for 4.10 then perhaps we should
> make FS_ENCRYPTION select CONFIG_BLOCK instead?
We already have FS_ENCRY
Am 04.01.2017 um 21:10 schrieb Eric Biggers:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:28:36AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>> Ted,
>>>
>>> Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 09:28:36AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > Ted,
> >
> > Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > >> That way we can get r
On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 10:49:26AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Ted,
>
> Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> >> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Arnd Be
Ted,
Am 01.01.2017 um 22:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
>>
>> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
>> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig
>> Fixes
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
> Signe
Hi,
> On 19.12.2016, at 12:25, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
> Signed-off-
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:25:32PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
>
> Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
> Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
> Signe
That way we can get rid of the direct dependency on CONFIG_BLOCK.
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig
Fixes: d475a507457b ("ubifs: Add skeleton for fscrypto")
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger
---
Changes since v1:
- Moved fscrypt_zeroout_range
12 matches
Mail list logo