On 07/07/16 09:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:39:09 +0100
> Juri Lelli wrote:
>
>
> > > Having a better look at this is in my TODO list... But I still need to
> > > find some time :)
> > >
> >
> > Same here. No spare cycles right now to have a thorough look at this. :(
>
On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 09:39:09 +0100
Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Having a better look at this is in my TODO list... But I still need to
> > find some time :)
> >
>
> Same here. No spare cycles right now to have a thorough look at this. :(
All in all, this should not hold up the current patch set. M
On 06/07/16 10:44, Luca Abeni wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:58:30 +0100
> Juri Lelli wrote:
>
> > On 05/07/16 12:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:39:33 +0100
> > > Juri Lelli wrote:
> > >
> > > return;
> > > > > >
> > > > > > /*
> > > > > > +* Use the
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 10:20:13 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:07:43 +0100
> Juri Lelli wrote:
>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadl
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 17:58:30 +0100
Juri Lelli wrote:
> On 05/07/16 12:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:39:33 +0100
> > Juri Lelli wrote:
> >
> > return;
> > > > >
> > > > > /*
> > > > > + * Use the scheduling parameters of the top
> > > > > pi-waiter
On 05/07/16 12:47, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:39:33 +0100
> Juri Lelli wrote:
>
> return;
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > +* Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter task,
> > > > +* if we have one from which we can inherit a deadlin
On Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:39:33 +0100
Juri Lelli wrote:
return;
> > >
> > > /*
> > > + * Use the scheduling parameters of the top pi-waiter task,
> > > + * if we have one from which we can inherit a deadline.
> > > + */
> > > + if (pi_task && dl_se->dl_boosted && dl_prio(pi_tas
On 05/07/16 10:20, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:07:43 +0100
> Juri Lelli wrote:
>
>
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> > index f
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:07:43 +0100
Juri Lelli wrote:
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 14 +++---
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index fcb7f0217ff4..2000ad2294d5 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadlin
On 05/07/16 15:37, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> 2016-06-30 3:07 GMT+08:00 Juri Lelli :
> > setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
> > one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
> >
> > 2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_
2016-06-30 3:07 GMT+08:00 Juri Lelli :
> setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
> one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
>
> 2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
>
> as we currently do
>
> setup_new_d
On 04/07/16 11:03, Luca Abeni wrote:
> Hi Juri,
>
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:07:43 +0100
> Juri Lelli wrote:
>
> > setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
> > one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
> >
> > 2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline:
Hi Juri,
On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 20:07:43 +0100
Juri Lelli wrote:
> setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
> one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
>
> 2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct
> sched_dl_entity"
>
> as we
setup_new_dl_entity() takes two parameters, but it only actually uses
one of them, under a different name, to setup a new dl_entity, after:
2f9f3fdc928 "sched/deadline: Remove dl_new from struct sched_dl_entity"
as we currently do
setup_new_dl_entity(&p->dl, &p->dl)
However, before Luca's cha
14 matches
Mail list logo
