Borislav,
thanks for the review,
On 2017/8/17 17:25, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 04:14:50PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
>> The revision 0x300 generic error data entry is different
>> from the old version, but currently iterating through the
>> GHES estatus blocks does not tak
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 04:14:50PM +0800, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
> The revision 0x300 generic error data entry is different
> from the old version, but currently iterating through the
> GHES estatus blocks does not take into account this difference.
> This will lead to failure to get the right data en
CC Will and Jonathan
On 2017/8/16 21:55, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
> On 8/16/2017 2:14 AM, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
>> The revision 0x300 generic error data entry is different
>> from the old version, but currently iterating through the
>> GHES estatus blocks does not take into account this difference.
>>
On 8/16/2017 2:14 AM, Dongjiu Geng wrote:
The revision 0x300 generic error data entry is different
from the old version, but currently iterating through the
GHES estatus blocks does not take into account this difference.
This will lead to failure to get the right data entry if GHES
has revision 0
The revision 0x300 generic error data entry is different
from the old version, but currently iterating through the
GHES estatus blocks does not take into account this difference.
This will lead to failure to get the right data entry if GHES
has revision 0x300 error data entry.
Update the GHES esta
5 matches
Mail list logo