Hello,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:16:05AM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > Yeah, generally looks good to me although @added/removed_bits argument
> > names irk me a bit. The name may be okay for local variables but I
> > keep thinking "what bits?". @subsys_mask or something indicating that
> >
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:40:10PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:29:27PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > what about this version:
>
> Yeah, generally looks good to me although @added/removed_bits argument
> names irk me a bit. The name may be okay for local var
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 05:29:27PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> what about this version:
Yeah, generally looks good to me although @added/removed_bits argument
names irk me a bit. The name may be okay for local variables but I
keep thinking "what bits?". @subsys_mask or something ind
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:38:51AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sorry about the delay.
no worries, thanks for doing this
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:27:22PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > Index: xattr/include/linux/cgroup.h
> > ===
Hello,
Sorry about the delay.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:27:22PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> Index: xattr/include/linux/cgroup.h
> ===
> --- xattr.orig/include/linux/cgroup.h 2012-07-03 15:43:43.404334484 -0400
> +++ xattr/inclu
Hi Tejun,
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 03:27:22PM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:28:31AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:22:20AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > > Changing subsys_bits via remount is being deprecated. No need to
> > > > worry
Hi Tejun,
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:28:31AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:22:20AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Changing subsys_bits via remount is being deprecated. No need to
> > > worry about this.
> >
> > Also, why does this matter? The xattrs are kept in cgrp anyway.
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:22:20AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Changing subsys_bits via remount is being deprecated. No need to
> > worry about this.
>
> Also, why does this matter? The xattrs are kept in cgrp anyway. Why
> does keeping dentry/inode around make difference?
Ah, okay, the file x
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:17:48AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:29:27AM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> > From: Li Zefan
> >
> > When remounting cgroupfs with some subsystems added to it and some
> > removed, cgroup will remove all the files in root directory and then
> >
On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 10:29:27AM -0400, Aristeu Rozanski wrote:
> From: Li Zefan
>
> When remounting cgroupfs with some subsystems added to it and some
> removed, cgroup will remove all the files in root directory and then
> re-popluate it.
>
> What I'm doing here is, only remove files which b
10 matches
Mail list logo