Em Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 03:34:42PM -0500, Vince Weaver escreveu:
> > You are right, I saw that Author: line in the changeset comment, close
> > to the start of the message and got confused, thanks for clarifying.
>
> Do I need to re-send this patch? It still applies cleanly to 3.14-rc1.
Sorry, p
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:37:03PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > 2014-01-09 (목), 09:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> > > Em Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:17:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > > Hi Vince,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 8 Jan
Em Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 09:37:03PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> 2014-01-09 (목), 09:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> > Em Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:17:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > Hi Vince,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:30:17 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > > just check
2014-01-09 (목), 09:12 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> Em Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:17:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Hi Vince,
> >
> > On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:30:17 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> > > just checking on the status of this patch. Am I sending it to the wrong
> > > place?
Em Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 05:17:27PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Vince,
>
> On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:30:17 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> > just checking on the status of this patch. Am I sending it to the wrong
> > place? Did it get lost in the post-holiday e-mail purges?
> >
> > The b
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 04:30:17PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> just checking on the status of this patch. Am I sending it to the wrong
> place? Did it get lost in the post-holiday e-mail purges?
>
> The bug is annoying if you're trying to use perf on ARM systems.
Its for acme and he seem
Hi Vince,
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 16:30:17 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> just checking on the status of this patch. Am I sending it to the wrong
> place? Did it get lost in the post-holiday e-mail purges?
>
> The bug is annoying if you're trying to use perf on ARM systems.
Right, acme, would
just checking on the status of this patch. Am I sending it to the wrong
place? Did it get lost in the post-holiday e-mail purges?
The bug is annoying if you're trying to use perf on ARM systems.
Vince
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> "perf list" listing of hardware events doe
"perf list" listing of hardware events doesn't work on older ARM devices.
The change enabling event detection:
commit b41f1cec91c37eeea6fdb15effbfa24ea0a5536b
Author: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Aug 27 11:41:53 2013 +0900
perf list: Skip unsupported events
uses the following code in tool
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 22:58:46 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>
>> Hi Vince,
>> Okay, the reason I set the bit was consideration of a very strict
>> perf_event_paranoid setting (-2).
>>
>> So maybe we can try it again with the bit cleared after a failure,
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Vince,
> Okay, the reason I set the bit was consideration of a very strict
> perf_event_paranoid setting (-2).
>
> So maybe we can try it again with the bit cleared after a failure, or
> checking the paranoid setting first.
If perf_event_paranoid is
Hi Vince,
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:58:35 -0500 (EST), Vince Weaver wrote:
> Hello,
>
> "perf list" listing of hardware events doesn't work on older ARM devices.
> The change enabling event detection:
>
> commit b41f1cec91c37eeea6fdb15effbfa24ea0a5536b
> Author: Namhyung Kim
> Date: Tue Aug 27 11:4
Hello,
"perf list" listing of hardware events doesn't work on older ARM devices.
The change enabling event detection:
commit b41f1cec91c37eeea6fdb15effbfa24ea0a5536b
Author: Namhyung Kim
Date: Tue Aug 27 11:41:53 2013 +0900
perf list: Skip unsupported events
uses the following code in t
13 matches
Mail list logo
