On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:11:18PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:13:39AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:33:25PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:47:55AM -0700,
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:13:39AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:33:25PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
>> > > This patch broke some TI platforms (using
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 11:13:39AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:33:25PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > > This patch broke some TI platforms (using edma) due to namespace
> > > conflicts. The error is:
> >
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 06:33:25PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > This patch broke some TI platforms (using edma) due to namespace
> > conflicts. The error is:
> >
> > ../../include/linux/dmaengine.h:54:2: error: expected identifier
>
On 30.10.13, Vinod Koul wrote:
> I fixed up the error with below, can you pls verify. Pls note this is compile
> tested only!
I tested this and my mmc driver using edma via drivers/dma seems to
work.
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
However you missed one piece:
CC [M] sound/soc/davinci/
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 09:47:55AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> This patch broke some TI platforms (using edma) due to namespace
> conflicts. The error is:
>
> ../../include/linux/dmaengine.h:54:2: error: expected identifier
> before numeric constant (for DMA_COMPLETE)
>
> .. it's because the
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:32:12AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> > Hi Vinod
>> >
>> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:28:29PM +02
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:32:12AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Vinod
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > Hi Vinod
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 1
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 08:32:12AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Vinod
>
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > Hi Vinod
> > >
> > > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > Yes i missed it in f
Hi Vinod
On Fri, 25 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > Hi Vinod
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > Yes i missed it in first place update the patch to fix that
> >
> > Are you planning to post a fixed version
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:28:29PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Hi Vinod
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > Yes i missed it in first place update the patch to fix that
>
> Are you planning to post a fixed version of this patch or you just fix it
> internally? Would be good t
Hi Vinod
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:37:45AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > index 0bc7275..683c380 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengin
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 04:27:55PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:37:45AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > index 0bc7275..683c380 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > @@ -45,16 +45,17 @@ static inline int dma_submit_err
Hi Sebastian
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:37:45AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > index 0bc7275..683c380 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > @@ -45,16 +45,17 @@ static inline int dma_submit_error(dma
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 07:37:45AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> index 0bc7275..683c380 100644
> --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> @@ -45,16 +45,17 @@ static inline int dma_submit_error(dma_cookie_t cookie)
>
> /**
> * enum dma_status - DMA transaction status
> -
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:27:13AM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:45:48AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > > >
> > > > Doesn't this break kernel compilation fo
On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:45:48AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > >
> > > Doesn't this break kernel compilation for a total of 27 commits? Or am I
> > > missing anything?
> >
> > Yes, I think at t
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:45:48AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> >
> > Doesn't this break kernel compilation for a total of 27 commits? Or am I
> > missing anything?
>
> Yes, I think at the start DMA_COMPLETE should just be a alias for
> DMA
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
>
>> the DMA_SUCCESS is a misnomer as dmaengine indicates the transfer is
>> complete and
>> gives no guarantee of the transfer success. Hence we should use DMA_COMPLTE
>> instead
Hi Vinod,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2013, Vinod Koul wrote:
> the DMA_SUCCESS is a misnomer as dmaengine indicates the transfer is complete
> and
> gives no guarantee of the transfer success. Hence we should use DMA_COMPLTE
> instead of DMA_SUCCESS
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul
> ---
> drivers/dma/dmaen
20 matches
Mail list logo
