Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-06-11 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:54 AM, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro On arm (at least shmobile_defconfig and versatile_defconfig) with gcc 4.

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-20 Thread AKASHI Takahiro
Hi Will, Steven, So sorry, I completely missed this message thread. I will submit a new patch (replacement of [1/8]) in the following e-mail. -Takahiro AKASHI On 05/03/2014 04:19 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:54:29 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_C

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 12 May 2014 17:12:46 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > If you point us at the branch and promise not to rebase it, that would be > fantastic. I will when I get the patch(es) :-) and run it through all my tests. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-12 Thread Will Deacon
Hey Steve, On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 05:05:35PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Mon, 12 May 2014 16:58:11 +0100 > Will Deacon wrote: > > > Akashi: did you get around to posting a new version of this patch? We can't > > take your arm64 patches until you get the core stuff merged... > > I haven't

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Mon, 12 May 2014 16:58:11 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > Akashi: did you get around to posting a new version of this patch? We can't > take your arm64 patches until you get the core stuff merged... I haven't seen any patches yet. What I can also do is to create a separate branch based on mainlin

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-12 Thread Will Deacon
Hi guys, On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 08:19:57PM +0100, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:54:29 +0900 > AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > Please add a bit m

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:54:29 +0900 AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. Please add a bit more to the change log. Like what you did. Something like: Most archs with HAVE_ARC

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2 May 2014 19:13:48 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > This one looks a bit too widespread to be merged via the arm64 tree. I > wonder if the ftrace maintainers would consider taking it as a cleanup? Oh, and I can take the patch if you feel uncomfortable with taking something so spread out. As i

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-02 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 2 May 2014 19:13:48 +0100 Will Deacon wrote: > Hi Akashi, > > On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:54:29AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > > > Signed-off-by: A

Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] ftrace: make CALLER_ADDRx macros more generic

2014-05-02 Thread Will Deacon
Hi Akashi, On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 10:54:29AM +0100, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > Most archs with HAVE_ARCH_CALLER_ADDR have the almost same definitions > of CALLER_ADDRx(n), and so put them into linux/ftrace.h. > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro > --- > arch/arm/include/asm/ftrace.h | 10 +-