On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> >> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> There is n
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
>> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpec
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>
> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
>> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.
>>
>> Use the proper accessor for the msi descripto
On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.
>
> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaa
5 matches
Mail list logo