On 4/22/05, Stefan Seyfried <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c~2005-04-22 17:07:56.0 +0200
> +++ linux/kernel/power/swsusp.c 2005-04-22 17:09:22.0 +0200
> @@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static int check_sig(void)
> */
>error =
Thank you.
On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 08:20 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Freitag,
> 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
> > OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
> > stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
>
> Known problem. Fix i
Pavel Machek wrote:
>> 1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
>>swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
> Hmm, feel free to provide a patch. (I need something to try git on :-).
Attached (sorry, Thunderbird...). One may argue over KERN_ERR, but i
don't m
Hi!
> > Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
> >
> > Is there way to say "git diff -r origin:" but dump it patch-by-patch
> > with some usable headers?
> >
> > [Looking at git export]
>
> Either Linus' demo git-export (NOT the same as git export!), or git
> patch. In
Al Viro wrote:
> thread_info, part 1:
Patches look fine. Some of the helper stuff could be moved to
asm-generic, but that can still be done later. The headers really need
some serious cleanup in this area, the dependencies are damned fragile.
I8 still have a completely untested patch to con
On Sat, 23 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Unfortunately first merge will make it practically unusable :-(.
No, quite the reverse. If I merge from you, and you use my commit ID as
the "base" point, it will work again.
But yes, if you actually send the result as _patches_ to me, then the
c
On Thursday 21 April 2005 02:59, you wrote:
Hello,
[build.log]
...
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c: In function `usb_stor_show_sense':
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: implicit declaration of function
`scsi_sense_key_string'
drivers/usb/storage/debug.c:166: warning: assignment makes pointer
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> You should put this into .git/remotes
>
> linus rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
Make that
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/gi
Am Freitag, 22. April 2005 03:20 schrieb Bob Gill:
> OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
> stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
Known problem. Fix in the pipeline.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from th
OK. I downloaded, patched and started the build. Basically everything
stops when I get a "microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared" error
(the build keeps trying, but no modules get created).
I suspect others may have the same problem, but feel free to e-mail me
for more information (and you
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
> Compile error on x86_64:
>
> CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
> drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
> drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
> in this function)
Pat
Dear diary, on Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 01:22:01AM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > > >
> > > > linus
> > > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
> >
> > (git
On Fri, 22 Apr 2005, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> Is there way to say "git diff -r origin:" but dump it patch-by-patch
> with some usable headers?
In my git version there is a command called "git-export" for exactly this.
I don't know if Pasky included that in his trees, but if not, you can just
g
Hi!
> > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > >
> > > linus
> > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
> (git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Nice, so I now have my own -git tree, with two changes in it...
Is there way to say "git diff -r orig
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:38:11PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
>
> It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
> git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
> it.
I've also started writing
Hi!
It seems that someone should write "Kernel hacker's guide to
git"... Documentation/git.txt seems like good place. I guess I'll do
it.
> > just plain vanilla" without rm -rf?
>
> git cancel will give you "plain last commit". If you need plain vanilla,
> the "hard way" now is to just do
>
>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
Some further backtracking:
The nic problem is already present in 2.6.12-rc1.
The pcmcia hang problem is not present in 2.6.12-rc1.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from t
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
>
>
> Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
>
Fixed the rc2/rc3 IDE Oops myself today that prevented me to test rc2
earlier. It seems the IDE maintainer is currently not very responsive
and I didn't ha
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:00:09PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> Hi!
Hi,
> > > Well, not sure.
> > >
> > > I did
> > >
> > > git track linus
> > > git cancel
> > >
> > > but Makefile still contains -rc2. (Is "git cancel" right way to
On 4/21/05, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Changes since 2.6.12-rc2:
>
> Benjamin Herrenschmidt:
...
> [PATCH] ppc32: Fix cpufreq problems
this depends on two patches in -mm:
add-suspend-method-to-cpufreq-core.patch
Add suspend method to cpufreq core
add-suspend-met
Hi!
> > > You should put this into .git/remotes
> > >
> > > linus
> > > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
>
> (git addremote is preferred for that :-)
Oops :-).
> > Well, not sure.
> >
> > I did
> >
> > git track linus
> > git cancel
> >
> > but Ma
Hi!
> there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
Are they new or were they in -rc2, too?
> 1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
>swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
>It is a bit annoying and I believe it will confuse some swsusp
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 06:57:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> thread_info part 3: heads.
headers, even...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Pl
m68k thread_info - part 4
The rest:
a) added embedded thread_info [m68k processor.h]
b) added missing symbols in asm-offsets.c
c) task_thread_info() and freinds in asm-m68k/thread_info.h
d) made m68k thread_info.h included by m68k processor.h, not the
other
thread_info part 3: heads.
a) in smp_lock.h #include of sched.h and spinlock.h moved under
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_KERNEL.
b) interrupt.h now explicitly pulls sched.h (not via smp_lock.h from
hardirq.h as it used to)
c) in two more places we need changes to compensate for (a) - one place in
arc
thread_info part 2:
encapsulates the rest of arch-dependent operations with thread_info access.
Two new helpers - setup_thread_info() and end_of_stack(). For normal
case the former consists of copying thread_info of parent to new thread_info
and the latter returns pointer immediately past
thread_info, part 1:
new helper - task_thread_info(task). On platforms that have thread_info
allocated separately (i.e. in default case) it simply returns task->thread_info.
m68k wants (and for good reasons) to embed its thread_info into task_struct.
So it will (in later patch) have task_
Hi Pavel,
there's some problems with swsusp in 2.6.12-rc3 (x86_64):
1. Is it necessary to print the following message during regular boot?
swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong signature?
It is a bit annoying and I believe it will confuse some swsusp
users.
2. PCMCIA related hangs during s
Dear diary, on Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 02:03:27PM CEST, I got a letter
where Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> > You should put this into .git/remotes
> >
> > linus
> > rsync://www.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git
(git addremote is preferred for that
On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 11:10:15AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> > Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> > > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
> >
> > Why do I still get
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 14:19:10 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
| > It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
| Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this lis
The following patch fixes the Oops though I don't know if this is the
correct solution.
--- linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c.ast
+++ linux-2.6.12-rc3/drivers/ide/ide.c
@@ -2082,7 +2082,8 @@
static int ide_drive_remove(struct device * dev)
{
ide_drive_t * drive = container_of(dev,ide_dr
As already reported to lkml and IDE maintainer for 2.6.12-rc2:
Oops on 'cardctl eject' of an IDE flash disk (Pretec ATA Flash 16MB).
2.6.11.2 works fine.
System:
Linux (none) 2.6.12-rc3-gringo #1 Thu Apr 21 15:45:08 CEST 2005 x86_64
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Kernel messages from startup to and i
Compile error on x86_64:
CC [M] drivers/usb/image/microtek.o
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c: In function `mts_scsi_abort':
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: `FAILURE' undeclared (first use
in this function)
drivers/usb/image/microtek.c:338: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
reported on
> It's available both as a patch (against 2.6.11) and as a tar-ball, and
Where IS the tarball? Not on www.kernel.org, that's for sure.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite - Universitätsmedizin BerlinTel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einri
On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 13:20 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> > under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> > adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> > read
Hi!
> > And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> > under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> > adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> > readable:
> >
> > a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
Hi!
> And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> readable:
>
> a2755a80f40e5794ddc20e00f781af9d6320fafb
>
> and
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, Jan Dittmer wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Geert Uytterhoeven:
> > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> > [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
>
> Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
Because to build m68k kernels,
Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven:
> [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.11
> [PATCH] M68k: Update defconfigs for 2.6.12-rc2
Why do I still get this error when trying to cross-compile for m68k?
toolchain:
Reading specs from
/usr/local/m68k-uclinux-tools/lib/gcc/m68k-uclinux
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [PATCH] zfcp: convert to compat_ioctl
This does not seem to compile anymore with defconfig:
CC drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.o
/usr/src/ctest/rc/kernel/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_aux.c:63: warning:
initialization from incompatible pointer type
/usr/src/ctest/rc/kernel/
On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 17:59 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And for the crazy people, the git archive on kernel.org is up and running
> under /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git. For the
> adventurous of you, the name of the 2.6.12-rc3 release is a very nice and
> readable:
>
>
Linux 2.6.12-rc3 is still missing the following compile fixes:
[PATCH] fix ultrastor.c compile error
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=111391774018717&w=2
[PATCH] fix aic7xxx_osm.c compile failure (gcc 2.95.x only)
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=111391769011616&w=2
[linu
Patrick McFarland wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
Ohh _G_ Is that Why!? I thought it was cause t
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 09:09 pm, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
> Why is kb not used anymore? What happened?
Linus decided that keyboards are out, and voice activation is in. Remember to
use a high quality microphone!
--
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Computer games don't aff
Have a look through the mail archives and try "Bitkeeper and Linux" in
google, lets just say its been interesting.
--
James Purser
http://ksit.dynalias.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ok,
you know what the subject line means by now, but this release is a bit
different from the usual ones, for obvious reasons. It's the first in a
_long_ time that I've done without using BK, and it's the first one ever
that has been built up completely with "git".
It's av
47 matches
Mail list logo
