On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:52:29PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:07:53PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
> >> On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > while building module i was getting
On 5/30/07, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:07:53PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > while building module i was getting following warning and it
> >terminate
> >> > > module building stage
> >> >
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:07:53PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > while building module i was getting following warning and it
> >terminate
> >> > > module building stage
> >> > The below are only warnings and your build should
On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > while building module i was getting following warning and it terminate
> > > module building stage
> > The below are only warnings and your build should succeed.
> >
> > It is obviously i386 - is it a clean allmodconfig or any
On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while building module i was getting following warning and it terminate
module building stage
The below are only warnings and your build should succeed.
It is obviously i386 - is it a clean allmodconfig or any changes?
Is it latest
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:07:53PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while building module i was getting following warning and it
terminate
module building stage
The below are only warnings and your build should succeed.
It is
On 5/30/07, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:07:53PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while building module i was getting following warning and it
terminate
module building stage
The below are only
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:52:29PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
On 5/30/07, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 08:07:53PM +0530, Tej Parkash wrote:
On 5/30/07, Tej Parkash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
while building module i was getting following warning and it
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Matti Aarnio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Joshua Jore wrote:
> > Huh? *is* supposed to be equivalent to according to RFC822.
>
> *NOT* for Procmail's REGULAR EXPRESSIONS.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 11:27:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> >From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >Having slowly switched every list I have to run or help run to
> >mailman I can recommend the pain of the switch over the pain of
> >running majordomo
> >
> > I suggested this
Alan Cox said:
> Having slowly switched every list I have to run or help run to mailman I can
> recommend the pain of the switch over the pain of running majordomo
There is a Majordomo 2 in development. I'm using it for all of my
lists now. The upgrade from Majordomo 1 wasn't terribly
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 22:58:16 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Having slowly switched every list I have to run or help run to
mailman I can recommend the pain of the switch over the pain of
running majordomo
I suggested this but Matti immediately told me
> According to DaveM: No.
> (Sometimes he holds possibly bad opinnions as ferociously as Linus,
>but on the other hand, that Majordomo 1.x digester breaks structured
>MIME messages BADLY. It should be trivial to fix, but I don't hack
>Md, I hack ZMailer -- and also sometimes the
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Joshua Jore wrote:
> Huh? *is* supposed to be equivalent to according to RFC822.
*NOT* for Procmail's REGULAR EXPRESSIONS.
They are, after all, just regular UNIX REs without special
knowledge about e.g. EMAIL.
/Matti Aarnio
-
t; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:26:33 -0400
> > From: Dmitry Pogosyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-12 i686)
> > X-Accept-Language: en
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: linux-kernel-digest ?
> > Precedence:
0 Sep 2000 14:26:33 -0400
From: Dmitry Pogosyan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-12 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: linux-kernel-digest ?
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from
According to DaveM: No.
(Sometimes he holds possibly bad opinnions as ferociously as Linus,
but on the other hand, that Majordomo 1.x digester breaks structured
MIME messages BADLY. It should be trivial to fix, but I don't hack
Md, I hack ZMailer -- and also sometimes the
Alan Cox said:
Having slowly switched every list I have to run or help run to mailman I can
recommend the pain of the switch over the pain of running majordomo
There is a Majordomo 2 in development. I'm using it for all of my
lists now. The upgrade from Majordomo 1 wasn't terribly painful.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 11:27:01PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having slowly switched every list I have to run or help run to
mailman I can recommend the pain of the switch over the pain of
running majordomo
I suggested this but Matti
Date:Thu, 21 Sep 2000 22:58:16 +0100 (BST)
From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Having slowly switched every list I have to run or help run to
mailman I can recommend the pain of the switch over the pain of
running majordomo
I suggested this but Matti immediately told me that
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> I think DaveM also supplied an answer: "procmail"
>
> Select by header:
>
> X-Mailing-List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Do note that TAB character, for some reason it really is not space..
> Store into separate folder from your normal inbox.
Ah!!! Thats why my
00, Dmitry Pogosyan wrote:
> Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 14:26:33 -0400
> From: Dmitry Pogosyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-12 i686)
> X-Accept-Language: en
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: linux-kernel-digest ?
> Precedence
Matti Aarnio wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:38:45PM +0100, Robert Greimel wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am just wondering if linux-kernel-digest is going to come back.
> > Greetings
>
> According to DaveM: No.
> (Sometimes he holds possibly bad opinnions as ferociously as Linus,
>but on
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:38:45PM +0100, Robert Greimel wrote:
> Hi,
> I am just wondering if linux-kernel-digest is going to come back.
> Greetings
According to DaveM: No.
(Sometimes he holds possibly bad opinnions as ferociously as Linus,
but on the other hand, that Majordomo 1.x
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:38:45PM +0100, Robert Greimel wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if linux-kernel-digest is going to come back.
Greetings
According to DaveM: No.
(Sometimes he holds possibly bad opinnions as ferociously as Linus,
but on the other hand, that Majordomo 1.x
Matti Aarnio wrote:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 04:38:45PM +0100, Robert Greimel wrote:
Hi,
I am just wondering if linux-kernel-digest is going to come back.
Greetings
According to DaveM: No.
(Sometimes he holds possibly bad opinnions as ferociously as Linus,
but on the other
Matti Aarnio wrote:
I think DaveM also supplied an answer: "procmail"
Select by header:
X-Mailing-List: TAB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do note that TAB character, for some reason it really is not space..
Store into separate folder from your normal inbox.
Ah!!! Thats why my space
27 matches
Mail list logo
