Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> > What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> > iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> > Maybe the heuristics in mount
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.
I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first
On 9/19/07, Andries E. Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:05:32AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> > I was actually asking for the logs explaining why you thought
> > the _kernel_ incorrectly "announced" it as an UDF filesystem.
>
> No, the CDROM announces itself as an
Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened here is simply that in the absence of a "-t" option,
> mount(8) defaulted (probably due to incorrect heuristics?) to UDF for
> some reason, thereby obviously failing.
I think the CD contains both ISO-9660 and UDF filesystems, but the
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:05:32AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> I was actually asking for the logs explaining why you thought
> the _kernel_ incorrectly "announced" it as an UDF filesystem.
No, the CDROM announces itself as an UDF filesystem.
> Hmm ... those "CD-RTOS", "CD-BRIDGE" and "CDUDF
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:05:32AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
I was actually asking for the logs explaining why you thought
the _kernel_ incorrectly announced it as an UDF filesystem.
No, the CDROM announces itself as an UDF filesystem.
Hmm ... those CD-RTOS, CD-BRIDGE and CDUDF File System
Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What happened here is simply that in the absence of a -t option,
mount(8) defaulted (probably due to incorrect heuristics?) to UDF for
some reason, thereby obviously failing.
I think the CD contains both ISO-9660 and UDF filesystems, but the
latter is
On 9/19/07, Andries E. Brouwer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:05:32AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
I was actually asking for the logs explaining why you thought
the _kernel_ incorrectly announced it as an UDF filesystem.
No, the CDROM announces itself as an UDF
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing NSR02.
Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.
I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb).
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing NSR02.
Maybe the heuristics in mount should be
Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:05:32 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi Andries,
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > > > On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
> > > > > ("CD-RTOS"
Hi Andries,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> > > > On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
> > > > ("CD-RTOS" "CD-BRIDGE" "CDUDF File System - Adaptec Inc"),
> > > > perhaps the kernel code
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
> > > ("CD-RTOS" "CD-BRIDGE" "CDUDF File System - Adaptec Inc"),
> > > perhaps the kernel code should be more robust.
>
> Could you send the complete dmesg log, and
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
> > mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
> > That is,
> > # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
> > works fine, but
> > # mount /dev/hdc /dir
> > mount: you didn't
> Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
> mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
> That is,
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
> works fine, but
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir
> mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
>
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
I will
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
(CD-RTOS CD-BRIDGE CDUDF File System - Adaptec Inc),
perhaps the kernel code should be more robust.
Could you send the complete dmesg log, and what you mean with
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a
Hi Andries,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
(CD-RTOS CD-BRIDGE CDUDF File System - Adaptec Inc),
perhaps the kernel code should be more
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:05:32 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi Andries,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
(CD-RTOS CD-BRIDGE CDUDF File
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
I will
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
I will
24 matches
Mail list logo
