Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/h
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 03:23:27PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> > What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> > iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> > Maybe the heuristics in mount shou
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 11:49:31PM +0200, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> What goes wrong on the mount side is that when it hesitates between
> iso9660 and udf it decides for udf when seeing "NSR02".
> Maybe the heuristics in mount should be tuned.
I'd like to see the CD image (or at least first 2Mb)
On 9/19/07, Andries E. Brouwer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:05:32AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> > I was actually asking for the logs explaining why you thought
> > the _kernel_ incorrectly "announced" it as an UDF filesystem.
>
> No, the CDROM announces itself as an U
Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened here is simply that in the absence of a "-t" option,
> mount(8) defaulted (probably due to incorrect heuristics?) to UDF for
> some reason, thereby obviously failing.
I think the CD contains both ISO-9660 and UDF filesystems, but the
latte
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 08:05:32AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> I was actually asking for the logs explaining why you thought
> the _kernel_ incorrectly "announced" it as an UDF filesystem.
No, the CDROM announces itself as an UDF filesystem.
> Hmm ... those "CD-RTOS", "CD-BRIDGE" and "CDUDF Fi
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:05:32 +0530 (IST) Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi Andries,
>
>
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> >
> > > > > On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
> > > > > ("CD-RTOS"
Hi Andries,
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
>
> > > > On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
> > > > ("CD-RTOS" "CD-BRIDGE" "CDUDF File System - Adaptec Inc"),
> > > > perhaps the kernel code s
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 05:48:28AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > On the other hand, this filesystem announces itself as UDF
> > > ("CD-RTOS" "CD-BRIDGE" "CDUDF File System - Adaptec Inc"),
> > > perhaps the kernel code should be more robust.
>
> Could you send the complete dmesg log, and what
Hi,
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
> > mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
> > That is,
> > # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
> > works fine, but
> > # mount /dev/hdc /dir
> > mount: you didn't spe
> Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
> mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
> That is,
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
> works fine, but
> # mount /dev/hdc /dir
> mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
>
Today I got a CD. MacOS does not mount it and Linux does not
mount it without an explicit filesystemtype option.
That is,
# mount /dev/hdc /dir -t iso9660
works fine, but
# mount /dev/hdc /dir
mount: you didn't specify a filesystem type for /dev/hdc
I will try
12 matches
Mail list logo
