Re: 2.6.26-git0: IDE oops during boot

2008-02-10 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 2/7/08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thursday 07 February 2008, Kamalesh Babulal wrote: >>> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2008-02-06 11:53:34, Pavel Machek

Re: raw_pci_read in quirk_intel_irqbalance

2008-02-10 Thread Grant Grundler
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:04:16PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > "A disabled or non-existent device's configuration register space is > > hidden. A disabled or non-existent device will return all ones for reads > > and will drop writes just as if the cycle terminated with a Master Abort > > on P

Linux 2.6.22.18

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.22.18 kernel. It fixes one thing, CVE-2008-0600. All users of the 2.6.22 series, with untrusted local users are strongly encouraged to upgrade. I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between 2.6.22.17 and 2.6.22.

[SCSI] ses: fix memory leaks

2008-02-10 Thread Yinghai Lu
please check it... --- From: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [SCSI] ses: fix memory leaks fix leaking with scomp leaking when failing. Also free page10 on driver removal  and remove one extra space. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Netfilter fixes to 2.6.24-git

2008-02-10 Thread Patrick McHardy
David Miller wrote: From: Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2008 22:02:35 +0100 (CET) I have been unable to reach the netfilter and net maintainers the past week regarding inclusion of patches, but most importantly a group of fixes at [0]-[3]. I am kind of at a loss here but

kvm: no hardware support

2008-02-10 Thread Yinghai Lu
I enable vmx and svm option for KVM in .config on amd SVM enable system vmx get tried at first and get kvm: no hardware support Calling initcall 0x80c2d465: vmx_init+0x0/0x119() kvm: no hardware support initcall 0x80c2d465: vmx_init+0x0/0x119() returned -95. initcall 0x8

Re: Linux 2.6.23.16

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 8920cb8..3a932c7 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 6 SUBLEVEL = 23 -EXTRAVERSION = .15 +EXTRAVERSION = .16 NAME = Arr Matey! A Hairy Bilge Rat! # *DOCUMENTATION* diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c index 2a

Linux 2.6.23.16

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.23.16 kernel. It fixes one thing, CVE-2008-0600. All users of the 2.6.23 series, with untrusted local users are strongly encouraged to upgrade. I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between 2.6.23.15 and 2.6.23.

Re: Linux 2.6.24.2

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index e6a6eec..6f79564 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 6 SUBLEVEL = 24 -EXTRAVERSION = .1 +EXTRAVERSION = .2 NAME = Err Metey! A Heury Beelge-a Ret! # *DOCUMENTATION* diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c index 3

Linux 2.6.24.2

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.24.2 kernel. It fixes one thing, CVE-2008-0600. All users of the 2.6.24 series, with untrusted local users are strongly encouraged to upgrade. I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between 2.6.24.1 and 2.6.24.2

Re: [PATCH] splice: fix user pointer access in get_iovec_page_array()

2008-02-10 Thread Oliver Pinter
Linux pancs 2.6.22.17-opt2-cve2 #1 SMP Sun Feb 10 16:22:37 CET 2008 i686 GNU/Linux --- Linux vmsplice Local Root Exploit By qaaz --- [+] mmap: 0x0 .. 0x1000 [+] page: 0x0 [+] page: 0x20 [+] mmap: 0x4000 .. 0x5000 [+] page: 0x4000 [+]

Re: [2.6.25-rc1 regression] Suspend to RAM (bisected)

2008-02-10 Thread Carlos R. Mafra
Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:25:33 -0200 > "Carlos R. Mafra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The problem with suspend to RAM is that right after typing (from >> inside X) 'echo mem > /sys/power/state' the screen becomes black and >> the laptop freezes. I have to use SysRq+b to

Re: [PATCH] Change pci_raw_ops to pci_raw_read/write

2008-02-10 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Feb 10, 2008 6:53 PM, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yinghai Lu wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2008 12:45 PM, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: .. > >> I've attached the two patches that I believe are the ones we want. We > >> can (and should) fix quirk_intel_irqbalance separately

Re: [PATCH] xfs: convert beX_add to beX_add_cpu (new common API)

2008-02-10 Thread David Chinner
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:18:09AM +0100, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > This patch was in Andrew tree, but it was uncomplete. > Here is updated version. > > --- > remove beX_add functions and replace all uses with beX_add_cpu > > Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- Looks good. You c

Re: raw_pci_read in quirk_intel_irqbalance

2008-02-10 Thread Matthew Wilcox
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:02:04PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > The line in question reads: > > /* read xTPR register */ > raw_pci_read(0, 0, 0x40, 0x4c, 2, &word); > > That's domain 0, bus 0, device 8, function 0, address 0x4c, length 2. > > I've checked the public E7525 and E

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ses fix mem leaking when fail to add intf

2008-02-10 Thread James Bottomley
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 15:15 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > [PATCH] scsi: ses fix mem leaking when fail to add intf > > fix leaking with scomp leaking when failing. > also remove one extra space. There are still a few extraneous code moves in this one. This is about the correct minimal set, isn't it

Re: Oops report for the week upto Feb 10th 2008

2008-02-10 Thread Arjan van de Ven
Alexey Dobriyan wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:35:51PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: Rank 3: remove_proc_entry WARN_ON at fs/proc/generic.c:736 Reported 20 times (38 total reports) This WARN_ON is there if code tries to remove a non-empty /proc directory. Most rep

Re: [2.6.25-rc1 regression] Suspend to RAM (bisected)

2008-02-10 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 03:25:33 -0200 "Carlos R. Mafra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The problem with suspend to RAM is that right after typing (from > inside X) 'echo mem > /sys/power/state' the screen becomes black and > the laptop freezes. I have to use SysRq+b to reboot. > > I tried to revert th

Re: [2.6.25-rc1 regression] Suspend to RAM (bisected)

2008-02-10 Thread Calvin Walton
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 03:25 -0200, Carlos R. Mafra wrote: > Hi, > > I want to report that suspend to RAM stopped working on my Sony Vaio > VGN-FZ240E in 2.6.25-rc1 and that I could bisect the problem down > to: > > commit bc71bec91f9875ef825d12104acf3bf4ca215fa4 > Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EM

Re: [PATCH] scsi: ses fix mem leaking when fail to add intf

2008-02-10 Thread Yinghai Lu
On Sunday 10 February 2008 08:28:38 pm James Bottomley wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 15:15 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > [PATCH] scsi: ses fix mem leaking when fail to add intf > > > > fix leaking with scomp leaking when failing. > > also remove one extra space. > > There are still a few extra

Re: Oops report for the week upto Feb 10th 2008

2008-02-10 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:35:51PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > Rank 3: remove_proc_entry > WARN_ON at fs/proc/generic.c:736 > Reported 20 times (38 total reports) > This WARN_ON is there if code tries to remove a non-empty /proc > directory. > Most reports are ta

2.6.25-rc1: Lguest build failure

2008-02-10 Thread Parag Warudkar
Hi Rusty Just got this build failure while building -rc1 - Root device is (254, 0) Setup is 12216 bytes (padded to 12288 bytes). System is 1915 kB Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#3) Building modules, stage 2. MODPOST 683 modules ERROR: "LGUEST_PAGES_guest_gdt_desc" [drivers/lguest/l

Re: [RFC PATCH] vfs: optimization to /proc//mountinfo patch

2008-02-10 Thread Ram Pai
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 01:28 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:15:05 -0800 Ram Pai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > 1) reports deleted inode in dentry_path() consistent with that in __d_path() > > 2) modified __d_path() to use prepend(), reducing the size of __d_path() > > 3) mov

[PATCH] vmsplice exploit fix (was: splice: fix user pointer access in get_iovec_page_array)

2008-02-10 Thread Daniel Phillips
Kudos to all involved in the rapid response. But. Information on patching this vulnerability is not available front and center in many of the places you would expect: kernel.org front page, debian.org front page, covered on planet.debian.org but without a pointer to the patch, and so on. So t

Re: Linux 2.6.22.18

2008-02-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 6a949eb..99c5e87 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ VERSION = 2 PATCHLEVEL = 6 SUBLEVEL = 22 -EXTRAVERSION = .17 +EXTRAVERSION = .18 NAME = Holy Dancing Manatees, Batman! # *DOCUMENTATION* diff --git a/fs/splice.c b/fs/splice.c index e

Re: [stable] [PATCH] vmsplice exploit fix (was: splice: fix user pointer access in get_iovec_page_array)

2008-02-10 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 11:29:50PM -0800, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Kudos to all involved in the rapid response. But. > > Information on patching this vulnerability is not available front and > center in many of the places you would expect: kernel.org front page, > debian.org front page, covered

Re: [PATCH] vmsplice exploit fix (was: splice: fix user pointer access in get_iovec_page_array)

2008-02-10 Thread Pekka Enberg
Hi Daniel, On Feb 11, 2008 9:29 AM, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think many users would first go to kernel.org on a day like today, as > I did. Nothing to see there. We could do a way better job of getting > the word out. Any suggestions what I could have done better here? As

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I see that only a very few of my comments posted yesterday got > addressed. On purpose or did you miss them? no, they went into another thread :-) i've now read your mail and addressed the majority of them - see the details below. i've trickled all

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:43:52AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > This still doesn't address a lot of the review comments from Jason's > > > last posting. > > > > sorry, which mails ar

Re: [git pull] x86 updates

2008-02-10 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:24:50 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > Linus, > > > > please pull the pending x86 updates from: > > > > ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git > > master > > Hi Thomas, > can we please

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's all in the thread starting with '[PATCH 0/8] kgdb 2.6.25 > > version', msgid > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or at > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/9/104 > > thanks - i found Sam's mail meanwhile and addressed most of the > observations and updated the

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:02:25AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > thanks - i found Sam's mail meanwhile and addressed most of the > observations and updated the kgdb.git tree. I'll now check the threads > above whether i missed anything. (feel free to point it out if you > notice anything outright)

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > Kerneldoc comments don't belong above the prototype of a function but > > the function body. > > disagree - the best is to have it in both places - and in many places we > do that. Anyway, this is up to maintainer discretion. Huh?

Re: [PATCH] Silent compiler warning introduced by commit 801c135ce73d5df1caf3eca35b66a10824ae0707 (UBI: Unsorted Block Images)

2008-02-10 Thread Jiri Slaby
On 02/10/2008 04:37 AM, S.Çağlar Onur wrote: Hi; Following patch silents drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c: In function `ubi_create_volume': drivers/mtd/ubi/vmt.c:379: warning: statement with no effect compiler warning introduced by commit 801c135ce73d5df1caf3eca35b66a10824ae0707 (UBI: Unsorted Block Ima

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] And while you're at it please remove all the filenames in the > top-of-file comments, not just in include/asm-generic/kgdb.h. fixed: there was just one such file remaining: include/linux/kgdb.h. > While we're at it is there a good reason

Re: [PATCH] [1/5] CPA: Split static_protections into required_static_prot and advised_static_prot

2008-02-10 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 06:09:23PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Note the behaviour for pageattr and thus DEBUG_RODATA / debugging > > > > sitations where you don't care about your TLB this > > > > does not change, this makes only a difference for the

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:57:35AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > It would be nice if you could move the kerneldoc comments to the > > proper place at least. [...] > > i'd agree in general but this is really a special case, please look at > the context. This would duplicate all the kerneldoc head

Re: [git pull] x86 updates

2008-02-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > So Thomas, don't do this. I don't like it. The same way I didn't like > seeing Ingo trying to mix in a kgdb pull into his x86 pull. Keep these > things separate - git is *really* good at having multiple bran

Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

2008-02-10 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 12:56 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Feb 9, 2008 5:56 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > i think the worst is over already and i'm reasonably sure that there are > > > no more bugs in it - this _

Re: [PATCH] [3/5] CPA: Make advised protection check truly advisory

2008-02-10 Thread Andi Kleen
Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 2) I care about RO as much as I care about the NX correctness. That's > the same logic and the same problem. If we have overlapping regions, > then we need to split large pages. Otherwise both protections are > useless to a certain degree. That's laud

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyway, to resolve this i've turning them into non-docbook, > > descriptive comments. Please submit any docbook patch to > > arch/x86/kernel/kgdb.c to x86.git if you'd like more documentation. > > no ne

Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

2008-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Feb 10, 2008 4:17 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 12:56 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Feb 9, 2008 5:56 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 2008-02-09 at 11:37 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > i think the worst is over a

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 09:21:32AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Kerneldoc comments don't belong above the prototype of a function but > > > the function body. > > > > disagree - the best is to have it in both places - and in many > > places w

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i dont think so. Which ones do you mean? I just reviewed them and > > they are either already done, or moot (for kgdb complications that i > > objected to and removed from this kgdb-x86 tree). > > The one I noticed quickly is the __ASSEMBLY__

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
> +#ifdef UART_CAP_UUE > + if (up->capabilities & UART_CAP_UUE) > +#else > + if (up->port.type == PORT_XSCALE) > +#endif This looks very odd. Can anyone explain what's going on here? Especially as UART_CAP_UUE is defined in drivers/serial/8250.h unconditionally. > diff --git a/drivers/se

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Niki Denev
On Feb 10, 2008 1:38 AM, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Feb 10, 2008 8:32 AM, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:04:35AM +0200, Niki Denev wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > As the subject says the 2.6.24.1 is still vulnerable to the vmsplice > > > local

Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

2008-02-10 Thread Martin Schwidefsky
On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 04:25 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > i guess my point was more: the pgtable_t typdef is new therefore it > must be defined for every architecture. your ability to directly > cross-compile and/or test a subset is great, but posting a change that > is know for a fact to break a

Re: [PATCH] Silent compiler warning introduced by acea6852f32b8805e166d885ed7e9f0c7cd10d41 ([BLUETOOTH]: Move children of connection device to NULL before connection down.)

2008-02-10 Thread Richard Knutsson
S.Çağlar Onur wrote: Hi; Following patch silents net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c: In function `del_conn': net/bluetooth/hci_sysfs.c:339: warning: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value compiler warning introduced by commit acea6852f32b8805e166d885ed7e9f0c7cd10d41 ([BLUETOOTH]: M

Re: [PATCH] unifdef linux/vt.h

2008-02-10 Thread Olaf Hering
On Fri, Feb 08, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:38:10 +0100 > Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 25, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > > > remove the newly added __KERNEL__ block from linux/vt.h > > > > Can you pick this up? The patch cant get any better. > > spose so

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:27:28AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > The one I noticed quickly is the __ASSEMBLY__ removal from > > asm-x86/kgdb.h. [...] > > people might want to experiment with early debug code as well and > include asm-x86/kgdb.h in assembly files. So i kept that, it's sensible.

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > tip 2e3ebf25b0bd8646e517806073e1991be1fec8a2. Shortlog, diffstat and > > the full patch can be found below, with all relevant review feedback > > addressed. Builds, boots and works fine on x86. > > here's gdb test-output from this 2e3ebf25b0bd kerne

[git pull] hrtimer/ntp bugfixes

2008-02-10 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Linus, please pull hrtimer and ntp bugfixes from: ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/linux-2.6-hrt.git master Following problems are addressed by these patches: - ntp: fix incorrect drift compensation - hrtimer: fix a stupid restart handling thinko, which keeps a

Re: CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

2008-02-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Feb 10, 2008 4:41 AM, Martin Schwidefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-02-10 at 04:25 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > i guess my point was more: the pgtable_t typdef is new therefore it > > must be defined for every architecture. your ability to directly > > cross-compile and/or te

[PATCH resend] qla3xxx: convert byte order of constant instead of variable

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
convert byte order of constant instead of variable which can be done at compile time (vs run time) Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/qla3xxx.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/qla3xxx.c b/drivers/net/qla3xxx.

pci_proc_init: proc_dir_entry '00' already registered

2008-02-10 Thread Olaf Hering
Current Linus tree gives this new warning during bootup: +proc_dir_entry '00' already registered +Call Trace: +[c0007b0dfba0] [c000e4b0] .show_stack+0x70/0x1bc (unreliable) +[c0007b0dfc50] [c00f2714] .proc_register+0x130/0x210 +[c0007b0dfd00] [c00f299c] .proc_mk

[PATCH] xfs: convert beX_add to beX_add_cpu (new common API)

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
This patch was in Andrew tree, but it was uncomplete. Here is updated version. --- remove beX_add functions and replace all uses with beX_add_cpu Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/xfs/quota/xfs_qm.c |6 ++-- fs/xfs/quota/xfs_trans_dquot.c |6 ++-- fs/xfs/xf

[PATCH resend] slab: avoid double initialization & do initialization in 1 place

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
- alloc_slabmgmt: initialize all slab fields in 1 place - slab->nodeid was initialized twice: in alloc_slabmgmt and immediately after it in cache_grow Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- mm

Re: [PATCH 4/6] udf: convert udf_stamp_to_time and udf_time_to_stamp to use timestamps

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:10:08PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 05-02-08 20:21:58, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:09, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > kernel_timestamp type was almost unused - only callers of > > >

[PATCH resend] ext2/3/4: convert byte order of constant instead of variable

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
convert byte order of constant instead of variable which can be done at compile time (vs run time) ext3/4 bits are #if 0'ed, but someone might copy this code into other places Signed-off-by: Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/ext2/super.c |8 +++- fs/ext3/super.c |2 +- fs/ext4

Re: [12/19] ftrace: function tracer

2008-02-10 Thread Eugene Teo
> From: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > This is a simple trace that uses the ftrace infrastructure. It is > designed to be fast and small, and easy to use. It is useful to > record things that happen over a very short period of time, and > not to analyze the system in general. > > Update

Re: [PATCH 5/6] udf: remove unneeded kernel_timestamp type

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:01:15PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Sun 03-02-08 19:36:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > remove now unneeded kernel_timestamp type with conversion functions > OK. Acked-by: Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> updated version which aplies after changes to patch: udf: convert udf

Re: KVM is not seen under X86 config with latest git (32 bit compile)

2008-02-10 Thread Avi Kivity
Balbir Singh wrote: The KVM configuration is no longer visible in the latest git tree. It looks like it is selected by HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA. I've moved HAVE_KVM to under CONFIG_X86. Hopefully, this is the right fix. Yes, this was caused by my misunderstanding of the Kconfig language. Ac

Re: [PATCH 6/6] udf: super.c reorganization

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:09:36PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 05-02-08 20:34:49, Marcin Slusarz wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 05:22:19PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Actually, the loop below would be even more readable it you did: > > > > > > if (map->s_partition_num == le16_to_cpu(p

Re: [PATCH 2.6.24-mm1] Mempolicy: silently restrict nodemask to allowed nodes V3

2008-02-10 Thread Andrew Morton
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:42:21 -0800 (PST) Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Once the patch goes into Linus's tree, feel free to send it to the > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] address so that we can include it in the 2.6.24.x > > tree. > > I've been

Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH][RFC] SVM: Add Support for Nested Paging in AMD Fam16 CPUs

2008-02-10 Thread Avi Kivity
Joerg Roedel wrote: On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 10:57:07AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: Very nice patchset; small, simple, and clean. Apart from the comments I already posted, I'd like to avoid the term 'hap': I find it non-descriptive, and it reminds me of another hypervisor. I suggest 'tlp' for t

[ANNOUNCE] GIT 1.5.4.1

2008-02-10 Thread Junio C Hamano
The latest maintenance release GIT 1.5.4.1 is available at the usual places: http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/ git-1.5.4.1.tar.{gz,bz2} (tarball) git-htmldocs-1.5.4.1.tar.{gz,bz2} (preformatted docs) git-manpages-1.5.4.1.tar.{gz,bz2}

udf regression: broken directory handling

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
Hi Current mainline has a problem with reading file list. Simple ls prints only 2 out of 8 files on my testing DVD. Reverting your patch "udf: cleanup directory offset handling" (af793295bf9ee92660f5e77d337b0493cea3f9b9) fixes the problem. Marcin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "un

Re: [PATCH] make KVM selectable again

2008-02-10 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:24:01PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > config HAVE_SETUP_PER_CPU_AREA > > def_bool X86_64 > > > > -select HAVE_KVM > > +config HAVE_KVM > > + def_bool y > > i think it might be better to just move the select to aft

Re: acer aspire 5720ZG APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) ACPI/USB

2008-02-10 Thread Mr Souissi
acer aspire 5720 ZG APIC error on CPU0: 40(40) ACPI/USB dmesg: Linux version 2.6.24.1-zs-core2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3 20080114 (prerelease) (Debian 4.2.2-7)) #1 SMP Sat Feb 9 11:12:29 CET 2008 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable

Re: [PATCH] make KVM selectable again

2008-02-10 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Dave. > > I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by putting some > comments in it. It seems to me like just putting: > > config HAVE_KVM > bool > > isn't letting anything come into my .config at all. I'm not sure why we > do that, and then have: > >

Re: [0/6] kgdb light

2008-02-10 Thread Sam Ravnborg
Hi Ingo. A few comments based on the git tree pulled as of ~11:00. We have following header files in the core part: linux/kgdb.h asm-generic/kgdb.h I would expect linux/kgdb.h to contain all the common definitions needed by an arch. And asm-generic/kgdb.h to list everything that the arch needs

Re: 2.6.24-git20 -- BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at include/asm/uaccess_32.h:449

2008-02-10 Thread Stefan Richter
Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:26:43 -0800 > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Guys, how often mut it be said? PLEASE always test all code with all >> kernel deubg options enabled. > > maybe we should make a CONFIG_KERNEL_DEVELOPER option that SELECTs the > various opti

Re: [PATCH] USB: mark USB drivers as being GPL only

2008-02-10 Thread Alan Cox
> Why? Because the pre-processor is what is including any GPL'd code in my > application and expanding any macros. That is a purely mechanical process and And its not pirating Windows because Norton Ghost put Microsoft copyright material in your hard disk either - thats a mechanical process too.

Re: KVM: Export include/linux/kvm.h only if $ARCH actually supports KVM

2008-02-10 Thread Olaf Hering
> Currently, make headers_check barfs due to , which > includes, not existing. Rather than add a zillion s, export kvm.h > only if the arch actually supports it. This makes headers_install_all unreliable. linux/kvm.h will not be exported, depending on what system the libc headers will be genera

Re: [git pull] x86 arch updates for v2.6.25

2008-02-10 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Amit Shah wrote: > cc503c1b "x86: PIE executable randomization" doesn't boot on my Ubuntu > Feisty Fawn Intel Core2 system. > I get numerous segfaults before getting a (initramfs) busybox shell. A > similar bug was reported much earlier: [ please, when you experience a problem

Re: [RFC] ipvs: Cleanup sync daemon code

2008-02-10 Thread Sven Wegener
On Sat, 9 Feb 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:38:11AM +0100, Sven Wegener wrote: struct ip_vs_sync_thread_data { - struct completion *startup; + struct completion *startup; /* set to NULL once completed */ This is not needed anmore. kthread_run guarante

pata_sil680 regression 2.6.22->2.6.24

2008-02-10 Thread Robert Lowery
Hi Folks, Having recently upgaded my Ubuntu install from Gutsy to Hardy, my 750GB Seagate disk connected via a SiI680 PCI card is no longer detected. I suspect this is caused by the MMIO changes in 2.6.24. Strangely in 2.6.22 the drive appears as sda1, but on 2.6.24 it appears as a non functioni

Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates

2008-02-10 Thread Németh Márton
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Fri, 08 Feb 2008, Németh Márton wrote: >> Richard Purdie wrote: > leds: Add support for hardware accelerated LED flashing This one has a loose end: when you call brightness_set on a led with hardware flash acceleration, you will leave the

Re: [PATCH] make KVM selectable again

2008-02-10 Thread Balbir Singh
On Feb 10, 2008 2:29 AM, Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Current git for me (b1d0e4f535e10775cffde922208b49629169aeaa) doesn't > let me build KVM. In fact, I don't seem to have *ANY* kvm-related > symbols in my .config at all. > > I've verified that arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig was getting run by

Re: ide/arm/bast-ide.c compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Russell King
FYI, from maintainers: SIMTEC EB2410ITX (BAST) P: Ben Dooks P: Vincent Sanders M: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.simtec.co.uk/products/EB2410ITX/ S: Supported On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 02:15:15AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Commit 9e016a719209d95338e314b46c3012cc7feaaeec c

Re: [PATCH] leds: disable triggers on brightness set

2008-02-10 Thread Németh Márton
Disable any active triggers when the brightness attribute is set to zero. Signed-off-by: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Richard Purdie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff --git a/Documentation/leds-class.txt b/Documentation/leds-class.

Re: [kvm-devel] KVM: add support for SVM Nested Paging

2008-02-10 Thread Avi Kivity
Joerg Roedel wrote: Hi, here is the improved patchset which adds support for the Nested Paging feature of the AMD Barcelona and Phenom processors to KVM. The patch set was successfully install- and runtime-tested with various guest operating systems (64 bit, 32 bit legacy and 32 bit PAE Linux, W

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:40:53AM -0500, Niki Denev wrote: > this fixed the problem for me (kernel 2.6.24.1) : > It appears that the initial patch checked the input to vmsplice_to_user, > but the exploit used vmsplice_to_pipe which remained open to the attack. This patch is broken. It opens the o

Re: acpi dsts loading and populate_rootfs

2008-02-10 Thread Eric Piel
(adding some CC's) Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:12:26AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Folks, moving this call around hidden behing in completely unreviewed acpi junk is not acceptable. Either populate_rootfs _is_ safe to be called earlier and then we should do it always

Re: [PATCH 2/5] Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region.

2008-02-10 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Andrew, On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 23:40:02 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:32:59 +0200 Thomas Renninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Provide acpi_check_{mem_}region. > > > > Drivers can additionally check against possible ACPI interference by also > > invoking this shortly b

Re: [10/19] ftrace: add basic support for gcc profiler instrumentation

2008-02-10 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Feb 10 2008 08:20, Ingo Molnar wrote: >--- linux.orig/Makefile >+++ linux/Makefile >@@ -509,6 +509,9 @@ endif > > include $(srctree)/arch/$(SRCARCH)/Makefile > >+ifdef CONFIG_FTRACE >+KBUILD_CFLAGS += -pg >+endif > ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER > KBUILD_CFLAGS += -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-opt

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Oliver Pinter
hmmm, with 2.6.22.y serie is too affected Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Last login: Sat Feb 9 15:34:35 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ./2617_26241_root_exploit --- Linux vmsplice Local Root Exploit By qa

[patch 0/2] ELF cleanup

2008-02-10 Thread gorcunov
These two patches do a simple cleaunp on ELF related code o Use EI_NIDENT instead of numeric value in elf64_hdr structure o Simplify fill_elf_header code by calling memset Please review. Any comments are welcome. -- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li

[patch 1/2] ELF: Use EI_NIDENT instead of numeric value

2008-02-10 Thread gorcunov
Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- elf.h |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) Index: linux-2.6.git/include/linux/elf.h === --- linux-2.6.git.orig/include/linux/elf.h 2008-02-08 19:09:52.0

[patch 2/2] BINFMT: fill_elf_header cleanup - use straigth memset first

2008-02-10 Thread gorcunov
This patch does simplify fill_elf_header function by setting to zero the whole elf header first. So we fillup the fields we really need only. before: textdata bss dec hex filename 11735 80 0 118152e27 fs/binfmt_elf.o after: textdata bss dec

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Niki Denev
On Feb 10, 2008 12:47 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:39:05PM +, Niki Denev wrote: > > This patch is against 2.6.24.1 which has already the fix to vmsplice_to_user > > With it i can't exploit the hole, and it is returns "invalid address" > > This is the

[PATCH] leds: add mail LED support for "Clevo D400P"

2008-02-10 Thread Németh Márton
The leds-clevo-mail module also works with model "Clevo D400P", add this model to the white list. Signed-off-by: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Andrey Kamenov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- diff -uprN a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig 2008-02-09 08:02:16

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 12:39:05PM +, Niki Denev wrote: > This patch is against 2.6.24.1 which has already the fix to vmsplice_to_user > With it i can't exploit the hole, and it is returns "invalid address" This is the vmsplice_to_pipe path and I have many reports that it is not fixed. Bastia

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Marcin Slusarz
On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:13:31AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > + } else { > + while (count-- > 0) { > + unsigned char ch; > + > + if (probe_kernel_address(mem, ch)) { > + kgdb_may_fault = 0; > +

Re: [Regression] 2.6.24-git9: RT sched mishandles artswrapper (bisected)

2008-02-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Thursday, 7 of February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Rafael J. Wysocki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://programming.kicks-ass.net/kernel-patches/sched-rt-group/ > > > > > > on top of sched-devel. > > > > Indeed, with these patches applied the issue is not reproducible any > > mor

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Niki Denev
On Feb 10, 2008 12:22 PM, Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 04:40:53AM -0500, Niki Denev wrote: > > this fixed the problem for me (kernel 2.6.24.1) : > > It appears that the initial patch checked the input to vmsplice_to_user, > > but the exploit used vmsplice_to_pi

Re: [0/6] kgdb light

2008-02-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Sam Ravnborg wrote: > ... > +extern int kgdb_may_fault; > I searched but I could not find any places this > variable were set to anuthing else than 0 neither where it was tested. This is a leftover from the old jmp-on-fault logic that was missed by this tree. I have a patch under test that kills t

Re: scsi/arm/fas216.c compile error

2008-02-10 Thread Boaz Harrosh
On Sat, Feb 09 2008 at 2:04 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Commit 30b0c37b27485a9cb897bfe3824f6f517b8c80d6 causes the following > compile error: > > <-- snip --> > > ... > CC drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.o > /home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/drivers/scsi/arm/fas216.c

Re: [PATCH] kernel 2.6.24.1 still vulnerable to the vmsplice local root exploit

2008-02-10 Thread Oliver Pinter
thx it fixed for 2.6.22 >>> commit f6e993b835393543bab2d917f9dea75218473edd Author: Oliver Pinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun Feb 10 14:03:46 2008 +0100 [PATCH] vm: splice local root exploit fix for 2.6.22.y Based on Bastian Blank's patch Fix for CVE_2008_0009 and CVE_2008-

Re: [3/6] kgdb: core

2008-02-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Marcin Slusarz wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 08:13:31AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> +} else { >> +while (count-- > 0) { >> +unsigned char ch; >> + >> +if (probe_kernel_address(mem, ch)) { >> +kgdb_may_fault = 0;

  1   2   3   4   >