in part it is due to the major/minor split which only gives 4 bits for the
partition number.
if you use devfs or LVM this limit is removed.
David Lang
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:10:41 -0800
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
another thing that would be interesting is what is the overhead on UP or
small (2-4 way) SMP machines
David Lang
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 16:52:25 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
at what data
you pass through your proxy.
now replay proxying with routing and I would agree with you (but I'll bet
this is handled in the kernel IP stack anyway)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
how about always_defragment (or whatever the option is now called) so that
your routing box always reassembles packets and then fragments them to the
correct size for the next segment? wouldn't this do the job?
David Lang
On Mon, 22 Jan 2001, Val Henson wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 12:37
what SCSI raid controllers would you guys reccomend for use under 2.4?
there was a question friday about a specific Adaptec one that received no
response, I know there is support in the kernel for some from compaq and
from IBM, but I don't know how extensive this is and if it is a case of
linux
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Frank v Waveren wrote:
Why? Why not just zero them, and get both security and compatibility...
the problem is that you don't know what they mean, just zeroing them may
break things (how will the sender know that you zeroed them).
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from
I am behind a raptor firewall and ran the test that David M posted a
couple days ago and was able to sucessfully connect to his test machine.
so either raptor tolorates ECN (at least in the verion I am running) or
the test was not valid.
David Lang
On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, jamal wrote:
Date: Sun
probably not now that SMP athlon boards are supposed to be starting to be
available.
David Lang
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, David Ford wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:37:02 -0800
From: David Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Frost [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: LKML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4.x
about the third story down is one mentioning SMP athlon boards actually
starting to show up
http://www.aceshardware.com/Spades/list_news.php?category=AMD
David Lang
On Wed, 31
Jan 2001, Tom Leete wrote:
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:48:31 -0500
From: Tom Leete [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Peter
menu to select between precompiled kernels with the correct
options (never mind what that will do to the size of the distros to ship
so many kernels)
David Lang
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:34:14 -0600
From: Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
. if you select a SCSI controller you
MUST select SCSI)
part 2. simplifications (i.e. if x86 and printer then x86_printer)
tehn have a mode where the part 2 rules are not evaluated to handle the
corner cases.
David Lang
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Eric S.
Raymond wrote:
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 10:53
for it.
I guess this should wait until Larry makes a comment.
David Lang
Isn't this "new" patch maintenance system much like bitkeeper?
Heh. I'm surprised Larry hasn't jumped into this discussion by now.
What we've implemented is a very small subset of the sort of features
that
kernel you
will need to do a 'make modules' and 'make modules_install' unless you
configure the kernel include everything you need for your server and not
use modules.
David Lang
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000, Kevin Jones wrote:
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2000 15:09:01 -0600
From: Kevin Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED
you may want to check the bitkeeper site, I think I remember hearing that
they have a copy of the kernel they keep up to date.
David Lang
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 18:22:49 -0700
From: David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc
allow programs that now need to run as root to bind the port to
just run as a normal user from the start.
comments?
David Lang
On Mon, 23 Oct 2000, Andrey Savochkin wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 19:11:46 +0800
From: Andrey Savochkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cefiar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Linux
Tim, what is it that this is designed to do that devfs doesn't (or
can't) do?
David Lang
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001, Tim Jansen wrote:
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 03:10:33 +0100
From: Tim Jansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [RFC/Patch] Device Registry
RFC: Linux Device Registry
there is a vt100 terminal emulater available for the palm (I had it, but
haven't used it in a while, I may have lost it due to not backing things
up properly)
David Lang
On Sun, 18 Mar 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote:
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:10:20 -0700 (MST)
From: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL
David, usually when it turns out that Linux finds hardware problems the
underlying cause is that linux makes more effective use of the component,
and as such something that was marginal under windows fails under linux as
the correct timing is used.
David Lang
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, David Riley
working properly under windows,
how do you know if the blue screen was caused by a windows bug or a
hardware error.
David Lang
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, David Riley wrote:
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:34:08 -0500
From: David Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED
try the 2.4 test kernels. I had a situation of poor performance with lots
of processes and saw a dramatic improvement with the 2.4 kernel.
David Lang
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Arnaud Installe wrote:
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 08:14:43 +0100
From: Arnaud Installe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Arnaud
David Lang
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Arnaud Installe wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 10:47:45 +0100
From: Arnaud Installe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: high load poor interactivity on fast thread creation
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:10PM
tuning
paramaters I need to fiddle with?
David Lang
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.2
iQEVAwUBOhWd3z7msCGEppcbAQGsQwf6A2AAnSDwtUlftuaHuIaLleu6VKEDVwwI
X2cWQfavGQFebLC01KzL9tTyEJwLHaKAhNsoKvOy7FwPFIVaOPafXlSR33tJokAD
VC/899S39MTuD1huNP7sdjVfdovqmz7KaIXxqasymiUFlB7woFsxHhfjV0T6VKi4
ow you to do ftp out with no problems.
the real point that you need the stateful filtering is on UDP ports. for
that again I don't know any way when not doing NAT, but when NAT is
enabled it does do basic stateful filtering (but watch out for timeouts)
David Lang
Yes it does. It's c
for crying out loud, even windows tells the users they need to shutdown
first and gripes at them if they pull the plug. what users are you trying
to protect, ones to clueless to even run windows?
David Lang
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001,
Daniel Phillips wrote:
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:14:53 +0100
on you.
David Lang
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, David Woodhouse wrote:
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 17:52:25 +
From: David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Journaling
reduce consumption (i.e., standby mode). But unplugging it at the
wall doesn't have any detrimental effects - doing that to a PC will.
if you change that statement to "usually won't harm it" I agree with you
(I have had a VCR eat a tape when this was done)
David Lang
Being able to c
of the things that
makes it so useful is that when you do outgrow what youcan do on a x86
platform you cna move to a more powerful platform without having to change
to a different OS.
David Lang
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000,
Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 15:45:45 -0700
From: Jeff V. Merkey [EMAIL
of the c99 way.
nobody is suggesting that the kernel loose functionality to achieve
portability, the suggestion was mearly to be portable where possible and
clearly mark the places where gcc-isms are used and why.
David Lang
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 16:06
the autodetect hassle in
the first place.
David Lang
On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 16:10:58 -0700
From: Jeff V. Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Martin Josefsson [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Tigran Aivazian [EMAIL PROTECTED], Anil kumar [EMAIL
for it to be 800K compressed as it is, how do you fit
even two of these on a disk.
remember it's not just the start of the file that varies based on cachline
size, it's the positioning of code and data thoughout the kernel image.
David Lang
On Tue, 7 Nov
2000, Jeff V. Merkey wrote:
Date: Tue, 07
the time you have monkeyed with the FPU.
David Lang
On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Reto Baettig wrote:
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2000 10:46:25 -0800
From: Reto Baettig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: david [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Linux Kernel List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: fpu now a must in kernel
When you add
how is that any different then a module? modules that are not included
with the kernel source are not guarenteed to work with any other kernel
version (including during the stable kernel series)
David Lang
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Alexander Viro wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
how many CPUs in these high loadave boxes? unless you have a very
impressive machine (8+SMP) the defaults should be plenty high.
also I thought the QueueLA default was 8 and the RefuseLA was 12 or have
they been bumped up since I last examined them (8.8/8.9 timeframes)
David Lang
On Fri, 10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
he flags what he considers 'critical fixes' with the level 1 tag
(something about them being level 1 problems or something like that)
David Lang
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, Erik Andersen wrote:
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:30:46 -0700
From: Erik Andersen [EMAIL
by now (mostly having to do with large number of virtual
IP addresses) but the symptoms were the same.
David Lang
On
Sat, 28 Apr 2001, valery wrote:
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 11:01:19 +0200
From: valery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux and high volume web sites
a rack of transmeta powered
boxes with no moving parts in the rack except possibly fans)
David Lang
On
Sat, 28 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 16:11:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Wakko Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Rogier Wolff [EMAIL PROTECTED
so that the DHCP request is lost in the switch, a few seconds
later when you do it by hand the swich has enabled your port and
everything works.
David Lang
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Garett Spencley
wrote:
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 11:44:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Garett Spencley [EMAIL PROTECTED
display for a multi-use win NT box) locks up a few seconds after the mouse
it moved.
David Lang
On Sat, 5 May 2001,
Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 21:37:44 +0200
From: Marc Schiffbauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: linux-kernel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 2.4.4 fork() problems (maybe
I am useing the D-link 4 port card without running into problems
(admittidly I have not been stressing it much yet)
David Lang
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Ben Greear wrote:
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:51:08 -0700
From: Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ken Brownfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Florin
before, don't work your way into a corner and encourage someone to replace
you (for one thing the new guy makes mistakes as they are learning things
and it's painful for the rest of us :-)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
I thought that when you compiled a kernel as UP it replaced the spin-lock
macros with versions that are blank. As a result a UP kernel spends no
time doing spinlocks at all.
that's why a SMP kernel on a UP box is slightly slower, there is more code
to be executed
David Lang
On Thu, 14 Jun
that big a problem for desktop/laptop use. with lilo it's
easy enough to have multiple kernels configured and boot from whichever
one you want.
David Lang
I'm not on the list so please CC me any responses
/John Nilsson
that the kernel structures
may change on you.
David Lang
On 24 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 24 Jun 2001 21:48:20 -0600
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: John Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some experience of linux on a Laptop
David Lang
Byte?
/troll
sorry couldn't resist
:-)
David Lang
Microseconds are written µs, or if the µ symbol is unavailable, us.
Sorry, this one grates on me...
-hpa
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] at work, [EMAIL PROTECTED] in private!
Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot.
http
a boot option to turn on the verbose mode if you want, but don't
eliminate it completely.
David Lang
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, Holger Lubitz wrote:
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:43:25 +0200
From: Holger Lubitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: lists.linux.kernel
Subject: Re
a bug in this proxy.
any ideas as to what could be accumulating to slowly tie up the cpu in
system mode?
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
is reading part of the file, or is writing to the file. In both of
these cases it seems that the fileserver is back to the write() penalty.
does anyone have stats on the types of requests that fileservers are being
asked for?
David Lang
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Date: Fri, 02 Feb
Thanks, that info on sendfile makes sense for the fileserver situation.
for webservers we will have to see (many/most CGI's look at stuff from the
client so I still have doubts as to how much use cacheing will be)
David Lang
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14
right, assuming that there is enough sendfile() benifit to overcome the
write() penalty from the stuff that can't be cached or sent from a file.
my question was basicly are there enough places where sendfile would
actually be used to make it a net gain.
David Lang
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, David S
just have to explicitly add this layer when it makes sense.
David Lang
On Mon, 5 Feb 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2001 20:54:29 +
From: Stephen C. Tweedie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stephen C. Tweedie [EMAIL
remember this will only affect those who use the frambuffer console
anyway. I for one never use frambuffer for my servers so it won't affect
the important machines anyway :-)
and for the desktop market, the idea of a pretty logo with the details a
keystroke away is not unreasonable
David Lang
and worth them spending their money there.
David Lang
On Mon, 19 Feb
2001, Nicholas Knight wrote:
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 03:28:56 -0800
From: Nicholas Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LONG RANT] Re: Linux stifles innovation
how do you hold a real-time chat with people around the world? the fact
that the key people would seldom be on at the same time severly limits
it's usefullness. the mailing list does a pretty good job as is.
David Lang
On Wed,
28 Mar 2001, Alexander Valys wrote:
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:37
boxes this would be a _very_ significant additional overhead in
memory (think a busy apache server, it forks a bunch of processes, but
currently most of that memory is COW and never actually needs to be
duplicated)
David Lang
On Thu, 29 Mar
2001, David Konerding wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001
2.2 or 2.4 kernel?
the 2.4 does a MUCH better job of dealing with large numbers of processes.
David Lang
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Fabio Riccardi wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:19:05 -0800
From: Fabio Riccardi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: linux scheduler limitations
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:
when generating the auto bug reports make sure that the system tells the
user exactly what data is being sent.
sending a large chunk of unknown data off the machine is a big concern to
many people.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
oops, I was going to quote a section from Larry's mail then decided not to
and forgot to delete the header.
David Lang
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote:
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Larry McVoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED
if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make
it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old /proc/config flamewar)
it's difficult enough sometimes for the sysadmin of a box to know what
kernel is running on it, let alone a bug reporting script.
David Lang
available.
David Lang
On Sun, 1 Apr
2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
If a sysadmin (note I don't say "user") has no clue what his kernel
config is, or has no clue what kernel is running on his box, then
they should be fired before the day is out.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this
could be, /sbin/installkernel doesn't exist on my systems
David Lang
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 18:34:07 -0500 (CDT)
From: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Manfred Spraul [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Albert D. Cahalan [EMAIL
Jeff, my point was that not all systems will have this script. also it
won't do you any good if the system you are compiling on is not the same
system the kernel will be running on
but we are starting the wrong discussion here :-)
David Lang
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik
wrote:
On Sun, 1
be looking for pirated software, but assuming that the bug report is
being sent as root how do you know that it's not sending out your password
file if it just send 'stuff' out)
David Lang
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Miles Lane wrote:
David Lang wrote:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:
when
) not to
mentions the ones that allow more values. you could still just list all
the config values without including the stuff to the left of the = it
would require matching up with the kernel version specific config file to
tell what is what but would cut down on the space needed.
David Lang
proc
be compressed to 1K?) make it so that you
need a common external tool to use the data and deliver it from the kernel
in compressed form and you don't even need to put the decompression
routine in the kernel (cat /proc/sys/kernel/config |gunzip config)
David Lang
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik
wrote:
Date
a module for 2.4.3 will work for any 2.4.3 kernel that supports modules
at all (except for the SMP vs UP issue) so it's not the same thing as
trying to figure out which if the 2.4.3 kernels matches what you are
running.
David Lang
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2001
have a couple of these and you would be able to keep one trained on the
most common speakers in any given discussion (then you only have the
problem of more speakers then mikes, but short of putting enough mikes
around to get the entire room you will always have this problem)
David Lang
On Mon
that the various patches haven't bitrotted.
boot time options would be even better, but I understand from previous
discussions I've watched that this is performance critical enough that the
overhead of this would throw off the results.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
, many people will not release code under a license that lets other
people change the terms years later.
David Lang
having to think about the other
things on the system.
allow people to use each tool for the appropriate task.
David Lang
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007, Rob Meijer wrote:
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 09:21:13 +0200 (CEST)
From: Rob Meijer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Karl MacMillan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: James Morris
way of doing this, but not the
only way.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
at confining
server applications. this really is a easier task (if it happens to be useful
for some desktop apps as well, so much the better)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
of the wedge.)
if you are trying to unwedge a system it may be a good idea to renice all tasks
to 0, it could be that a task at +19 is holding a lock that something else is
waiting for.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message
and what they point to
any ability to mark a filesystem as 'clean' and then not have to check it on
reboot is a bonus on top of this.
David Lang
Second, it is not clear how, under assumption of bugs in the file system
code (which paper makes at the very beginning), fsck can limit itself
only
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Nikita Danilov wrote:
David Lang writes:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Nikita Danilov wrote:
Amit Gud writes:
Hello,
This is an initial implementation of ChunkFS technique, briefly discussed
at: http://lwn.net/Articles/190222 and
http://cis.ksu.edu/~gud/docs
, and it's ok to let you re-use ports)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
are good at, use a different scheduler, with the very real
possibility that a person could get this answer from ALL schedulers, leaving
them with nothing good to use.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED
consider more important (and how
much more important you consider it), then it's much easier to figure out who to
give the CPU to. Con is just asking you to do this (and you already do, by doing
a nice -5. but it sounds like you want that to mean more then it currently does)
David Lang
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:
On 3/12/07, David Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the problem comes when this isn't enough. if you have several CPU hogs on a
system, and they are all around the same priority level, how can the
scheduler
know which one needs the CPU the most for good
port
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
the risk that the lawyer is wrong and a
cour may order you to stop distributing the product unless you comply with the
GPL.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
V. (Ex. 181 ?50.)
this seems to be saying that the boundries of derivitive work as far as
copyright goes are much more limited then just about anyone in computer science
would define the term
David Lang
, it would at least be predictable.
if the nice levels don't have enough of an effect, how much of an effect should
a given nice level have? (con has asked this several times, I haven't seen an
answer from anyone)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
user. I know that on mine, I don't want the
updatedb process that runs as 'nobody' out of cron to have the same percentage
of cpu as all the processes running as my userid.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
not be powers of 2 (128k-128b from
his e-mail) _may_ end up being a big enough difference that it's not worth
teaching the exising block layer how to deal with, but it's not clear why you
are useing this odd size.
this is why you are being asked for further explinations.
David Lang
it
unnessasary, or when it's read-only so you don't have writes to worry about (or
even if it's read-only 99.% of the time so writes are so rare that all the
writes in the expected lifetime of the device won't cause problems)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
could shift to a different block for your table, or retire
the flash)
David Lang
is 30 min)
now I just need to find a version of split that can compress it's output files.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
drivers to the kernel (I
don't remember which drivers, he's mentioned them earlier in this thread)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please
useing menuconfig.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
a hash collision with two entries.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
been reliable, and there's
pleanty of CPU and ram to handle firewall tasks.
besides, sometimes you don't want to trust the closed-source vlan
implementations on the switches ;-)
David Lang
http://innerfire.net/pics/projects/21portfirewall_2.jpg
(assigns each port it's ip range and blocks any
law now that says that this isn't the case (although I agree that it's
not nearly as broad as it's proponents would like it to be)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 70
66% 80
75% 83
80%101
90% 3075
95% 3088
98% 9073
99% 9087
100% 12291 (longest request)
David Lang
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:54:02AM +0100, Ingo Molnar
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 08:56:28AM -0800, David Lang ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the ab numbers below do not seem that impressive to me, especially for such
stripped down server processes.
...
client and server are dual opteron 252 with 8G of ram
machines using ab:
http://tservice.net.ru/~s0mbre/blog/2006/10/08#2006_10_08
is this client avaialble? and what patches need to be added to the kernel to use
it?
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
to strace, the clone call that's being made is
clone(child_stack=0, flags=CLONE_CHILD_CLEARTID|CLONE_CHILD_SETTID|SIGCHLD,
child_tidptr=0xb7c92c08)
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
David Lang a écrit :
I have a fork-heavy workload (a proxy that forks per connection, I know
it's not the most efficiant design) and I discovered a 2x performance
difference between a static and dynamicly linked version of the same
program (2200
differently then other serial ports
on the front panel sure didn't make my life easier in dealing with them.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
have one type, or someone else put lables on the box
before shipping it to you), and in the other 0.01% of the users, they are
running a tool anyway to get the gory details of things so it isn't a big
harship for them.
David Lang
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux
1 - 100 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
