[git patches] libata fixes

2013-04-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
The HDIO_DRIVE_* fix is really the biggie. Please pull 6d3bfc7be6f80d0c6ee6800d58d573343bf6e260 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c| 14 +-

[git patches] libata fixes

2013-04-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
The HDIO_DRIVE_* fix is really the biggie. Please pull 6d3bfc7be6f80d0c6ee6800d58d573343bf6e260 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c| 14 +-

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2013-01-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Please pull 803739d25c2343da6d2f95eebdcbc08bf67097d4 from > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git > tags/upstream-linus >From the tag message: " Thought: I wonder if sparse could have caught this,

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2013-01-22 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Garzik j...@garzik.org wrote: Please pull 803739d25c2343da6d2f95eebdcbc08bf67097d4 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus From the tag message: Thought: I wonder if sparse could have caught

[git patches] libata fixes

2013-01-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull 803739d25c2343da6d2f95eebdcbc08bf67097d4 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c| 8 +++- drivers/ata/libahci.c | 6 +++--- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 22

[git patches] libata fixes

2013-01-21 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull 803739d25c2343da6d2f95eebdcbc08bf67097d4 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c| 8 +++- drivers/ata/libahci.c | 6 +++--- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 22

[git patches] libata fixes

2012-11-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
If you were going to shoot me for not sending these earlier, you would be right. -rc6 beat me by ~2 hours it seems, and they really should have gone out to libata-dev.git and you long before that. These have been in libata-dev.git for a day or so (unfortunately linux-next is on vacation). The

[git patches] libata fixes

2012-11-16 Thread Jeff Garzik
If you were going to shoot me for not sending these earlier, you would be right. -rc6 beat me by ~2 hours it seems, and they really should have gone out to libata-dev.git and you long before that. These have been in libata-dev.git for a day or so (unfortunately linux-next is on vacation). The

Re: [git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 02.10.2012 23:59, Jeff Garzik wrote: > On 10/02/2012 03:44 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> On 02.10.2012 23:40, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> >>> Minor libata updates, nothing notable. >>> >>> 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused >>> disk corruption in linux-next, proving it cannot

Re: [git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 10/02/2012 03:44 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: On 02.10.2012 23:40, Jeff Garzik wrote: Minor libata updates, nothing notable. 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused disk corruption in linux-next, proving it cannot be turned on by default. Any details on that? Disk

Re: [git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 02.10.2012 23:40, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Minor libata updates, nothing notable. > > 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused >disk corruption in linux-next, proving it cannot be turned on by >default. Any details on that? Disk corruprion is rather a nasty side-effect

[git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull 13b74085d92feda78bad1045516d332a1e9a3407 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus to receive the following updates: Minor libata updates, nothing notable. 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused disk

[git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull 13b74085d92feda78bad1045516d332a1e9a3407 from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git tags/upstream-linus to receive the following updates: Minor libata updates, nothing notable. 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused disk

Re: [git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 02.10.2012 23:40, Jeff Garzik wrote: Minor libata updates, nothing notable. 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused disk corruption in linux-next, proving it cannot be turned on by default. Any details on that? Disk corruprion is rather a nasty side-effect indeed.

Re: [git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Jeff Garzik
On 10/02/2012 03:44 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: On 02.10.2012 23:40, Jeff Garzik wrote: Minor libata updates, nothing notable. 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused disk corruption in linux-next, proving it cannot be turned on by default. Any details on that? Disk

Re: [git patches] libata fixes for 3.7

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 02.10.2012 23:59, Jeff Garzik wrote: On 10/02/2012 03:44 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: On 02.10.2012 23:40, Jeff Garzik wrote: Minor libata updates, nothing notable. 1) Apply -- and then revert -- the FUA feature. Caused disk corruption in linux-next, proving it cannot be turned on by

[git patches] libata fixes

2012-08-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Changes: 1) libata-acpi regression fix 2) additional or corrected drive quirks for ata_blacklist 3) Kconfig text tweaking 4) new PCI IDs 5) pata_atiixp: quirk for MSI motherboard 6) export ahci_dev_classify for an ahci_platform driver Please pull d17d794c63e2dc0a5b1ffc8367c9475880427fc7

[git patches] libata fixes

2012-08-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Changes: 1) libata-acpi regression fix 2) additional or corrected drive quirks for ata_blacklist 3) Kconfig text tweaking 4) new PCI IDs 5) pata_atiixp: quirk for MSI motherboard 6) export ahci_dev_classify for an ahci_platform driver Please pull d17d794c63e2dc0a5b1ffc8367c9475880427fc7

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Alan Cox wrote: > > From the patch description it can't be told whether the patch itself is > > correct and only the patch description is bogus... > > zero length PRD misparsing. If I remember rightly old IDE never generates > 64K PRD slots because other hardware can't

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-24 Thread Alan Cox
> From the patch description it can't be told whether the patch itself is > correct and only the patch description is bogus... zero length PRD misparsing. If I remember rightly old IDE never generates 64K PRD slots because other hardware can't handle it either (CS5520/30 etc) -- To unsubscribe

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: [...] > Alan Cox (1): > pata_atiixp: Use 255 sector limit AHCI needs sorting too but this deals with the old interface Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [...] >> diff --git

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote: [...] Alan Cox (1): pata_atiixp: Use 255 sector limit AHCI needs sorting too but this deals with the old interface Signed-off-by: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] diff --git

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-24 Thread Alan Cox
From the patch description it can't be told whether the patch itself is correct and only the patch description is bogus... zero length PRD misparsing. If I remember rightly old IDE never generates 64K PRD slots because other hardware can't handle it either (CS5520/30 etc) -- To unsubscribe from

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-24 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Alan Cox wrote: From the patch description it can't be told whether the patch itself is correct and only the patch description is bogus... zero length PRD misparsing. If I remember rightly old IDE never generates 64K PRD slots because other hardware can't handle

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c| 23 +-- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 16 ++-- drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c| 23 +-- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 16 ++-- drivers/ata/libata-pmp.c

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Note: Tejun's change is a feature addition, but one that is IMO important for debugging and serious-bug workarounds. It's self-contained and should not affect anyone not using the new parm. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Note: Tejun's change is a feature addition, but one that is IMO important for debugging and serious-bug workarounds. It's self-contained and should not affect anyone not using the new parm. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Got another couple sata_mv fixes pending too... coming soon. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |2 +- drivers/ata/libata-core.c |

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Got another couple sata_mv fixes pending too... coming soon. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |2 +- drivers/ata/libata-core.c |

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-fixes' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-fixes to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 48 +- drivers/ata/pata_amd.c |2 +-

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-02-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-fixes' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-fixes to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 48 +- drivers/ata/pata_amd.c |2 +-

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-01-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Open issues for 2.6.24: sata_nv ADMA, sata_nv 32/64bit DMA Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |4 +++- drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c |

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-01-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Open issues for 2.6.24: sata_nv ADMA, sata_nv 32/64bit DMA Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |4 +++- drivers/ata/pata_bf54x.c |

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-01-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c| 51 + drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c |6 ++--

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-01-14 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c| 51 + drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c |6 ++--

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-01-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Still working through the backlog, but this is most of the immediate libata stuff. I asked DaveM to help out with netdev fixes, so there shouldn't be much of a 2.6.24-rc backlog at all there (thanks again David). Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

[git patches] libata fixes

2008-01-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Still working through the backlog, but this is most of the immediate libata stuff. I asked DaveM to help out with netdev fixes, so there shouldn't be much of a 2.6.24-rc backlog at all there (thanks again David). Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
In 2.6.24, we turned on ACPI support in libata. This is needed in order to support suspend/resume and BIOS passworded drives, but it inevitably brought with it a host of new regressions -- which is what happens anytime you blindly accept ATA commands the BIOS has decided to toss your way. :)

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
In 2.6.24, we turned on ACPI support in libata. This is needed in order to support suspend/resume and BIOS passworded drives, but it inevitably brought with it a host of new regressions -- which is what happens anytime you blindly accept ATA commands the BIOS has decided to toss your way. :)

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Frans Pop
Jeff Garzik wrote: > libata disabling command queueing (aka NCQ) based on some hueristics for > detection device brokenness that ultimately turned out to be broken. > > Remove the broken hueristic and turn NCQ back on for all the wrongfully > maligned hard drives. Yay! -- To unsubscribe from

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Notable: kill spurious NCQ completion detection libata disabling command queueing (aka NCQ) based on some hueristics for detection device brokenness that ultimately turned out to be broken. Remove the broken hueristic and turn NCQ back on for all the wrongfully maligned hard drives.

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Frans Pop
Jeff Garzik wrote: libata disabling command queueing (aka NCQ) based on some hueristics for detection device brokenness that ultimately turned out to be broken. Remove the broken hueristic and turn NCQ back on for all the wrongfully maligned hard drives. Yay! -- To unsubscribe from this

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
Notable: kill spurious NCQ completion detection libata disabling command queueing (aka NCQ) based on some hueristics for detection device brokenness that ultimately turned out to be broken. Remove the broken hueristic and turn NCQ back on for all the wrongfully maligned hard drives.

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c |4 drivers/ata/pata_amd.c |5 +++-- drivers/ata/pata_via.c |4 ++-- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c |

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-04 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c |4 drivers/ata/pata_amd.c |5 +++-- drivers/ata/pata_via.c |4 ++-- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c |

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c| 28 +++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c |8 +++-- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 42

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-12-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c| 28 +++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c |8 +++-- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 42

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
NOTE: This includes 100% of the fixes collected during the week I was on vacation, by Tejun... rebased. So all the commit ids are different from his push. If you have not pulled from Tejun, then pull this. If you have pulled from Tejun, then do not pull this (I will rebase once Tejun's pull

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-26 Thread Jeff Garzik
NOTE: This includes 100% of the fixes collected during the week I was on vacation, by Tejun... rebased. So all the commit ids are different from his push. If you have not pulled from Tejun, then pull this. If you have pulled from Tejun, then do not pull this (I will rebase once Tejun's pull

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: These are upstream patches I collected while Jeff is away. Thanks. * workaround for ATAPI tape drives * detection/suspend workarounds for several laptops * ICH8/9 port_enable fix ata_piix controller ID reorganization is included to ease the fixes. Please pull from

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Tejun Heo wrote: These are upstream patches I collected while Jeff is away. Thanks. * workaround for ATAPI tape drives * detection/suspend workarounds for several laptops * ICH8/9 port_enable fix ata_piix controller ID reorganization is included to ease the fixes. Please pull from

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-18 Thread Tejun Heo
These are upstream patches I collected while Jeff is away. Thanks. * workaround for ATAPI tape drives * detection/suspend workarounds for several laptops * ICH8/9 port_enable fix ata_piix controller ID reorganization is included to ease the fixes. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-18 Thread Tejun Heo
These are upstream patches I collected while Jeff is away. Thanks. * workaround for ATAPI tape drives * detection/suspend workarounds for several laptops * ICH8/9 port_enable fix ata_piix controller ID reorganization is included to ease the fixes. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |7 +++ drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 10 +--- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 78

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |7 +++ drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 10 +--- drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 78

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |1 + drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 39 ---

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |1 + drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 39 ---

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes, fixes and more fixes. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 38 --- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c| 148

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-11-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes, fixes and more fixes. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 38 --- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c| 148

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mikael Pettersson wrote: That's my fault for misremembering the rule about the number of dashes before the other comments part :-( I'll remember better in the future. Well, I should have caught it and hand-edited it on my side too... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-31 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > Mikael Pettersson (2): > > sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround, take 2 > > sata_promise: cleanups > > You and Mikael need to sort out the way you send/accept

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mikael Pettersson wrote: That's my fault for misremembering the rule about the number of dashes before the other comments part :-( I'll remember better in the future. Well, I should have caught it and hand-edited it on my side too... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-31 Thread Mikael Pettersson
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Mikael Pettersson (2): sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround, take 2 sata_promise: cleanups You and Mikael need to sort out the way you send/accept patches.

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Oct 30 2007 12:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>> >>> Can we change git-am to accept two dashes as well as three? :) >> >>Well, git-am actually used to be a lot less strict about the dashes, and >>we've made

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 30 2007 12:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> >> Can we change git-am to accept two dashes as well as three? :) >> >> It seems pretty common, not just with Mikael but several others who send >> patches to me. > >Well, git-am actually used to be a lot

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Can we change git-am to accept two dashes as well as three? :) > > It seems pretty common, not just with Mikael but several others who send > patches to me. Well, git-am actually used to be a lot less strict about the dashes, and we've made it

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Mikael Pettersson (2): sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround, take 2 sata_promise: cleanups You and Mikael need to sort out the way you send/accept patches. Both of these commits had stuff like this:

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Mikael Pettersson (2): > sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround, take 2 > sata_promise: cleanups You and Mikael need to sort out the way you send/accept patches. Both of these commits had stuff like this: Signed-off-by: Mikael

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Of particular note is the sata_promise fix, which works around a nasty hw errata. I need to push that to stable@ Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates:

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Of particular note is the sata_promise fix, which works around a nasty hw errata. I need to push that to stable@ Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates:

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Mikael Pettersson (2): sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround, take 2 sata_promise: cleanups You and Mikael need to sort out the way you send/accept patches. Both of these commits had stuff like this: Signed-off-by: Mikael

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jeff Garzik
Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Mikael Pettersson (2): sata_promise: ASIC PRD table bug workaround, take 2 sata_promise: cleanups You and Mikael need to sort out the way you send/accept patches. Both of these commits had stuff like this:

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Can we change git-am to accept two dashes as well as three? :) It seems pretty common, not just with Mikael but several others who send patches to me. Well, git-am actually used to be a lot less strict about the dashes, and we've made it *more*

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Oct 30 2007 12:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Can we change git-am to accept two dashes as well as three? :) It seems pretty common, not just with Mikael but several others who send patches to me. Well, git-am actually used to be a lot less strict

Re: [git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-30 Thread Junio C Hamano
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Oct 30 2007 12:31, Linus Torvalds wrote: On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: Can we change git-am to accept two dashes as well as three? :) Well, git-am actually used to be a lot less strict about the dashes, and we've made it *more* strict

[git patches] libata fixes and checkpatch cleanups

2007-10-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c | 26 +++--- drivers/ata/ata_piix.c | 29 +++--- drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 16 ++--

[git patches] libata fixes and checkpatch cleanups

2007-10-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c | 26 +++--- drivers/ata/ata_piix.c | 29 +++--- drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 16 ++--

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |2 +- drivers/ata/pata_cs5536.c |4 ++-- drivers/ata/sata_sis.c| 15 +-- 3 files

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-19 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |2 +- drivers/ata/pata_cs5536.c |4 ++-- drivers/ata/sata_sis.c| 15 +-- 3 files

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Well, the new driver is not a fix. Anyway -- still plugging away at debugging libata. It seems some outside changes are causing a bunch of my test boxes to crap themselves. These need to go up in the meantime, however. Maybe its the sg-chaining stuff, we'll see. I'm watching that thread

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-17 Thread Jeff Garzik
Well, the new driver is not a fix. Anyway -- still plugging away at debugging libata. It seems some outside changes are causing a bunch of my test boxes to crap themselves. These need to go up in the meantime, however. Maybe its the sg-chaining stuff, we'll see. I'm watching that thread

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fix ugly sata_mv bug, that exists due to lack of IOMMU knowledge about device constraints (FUJITA Tomonori's current work should fix this issue long term, hopefully). Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-10-03 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fix ugly sata_mv bug, that exists due to lack of IOMMU knowledge about device constraints (FUJITA Tomonori's current work should fix this issue long term, hopefully). Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/pata_sis.c |3 ++- drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c | 16 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-09-25 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/pata_sis.c |3 ++- drivers/ata/sata_sil24.c | 16 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 5

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-09-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes from Alan, PCI IDs from ATI/AMD. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c| 10 ++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c |4

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-09-20 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes from Alan, PCI IDs from ATI/AMD. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ahci.c| 10 ++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c |4

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-09-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |1 + drivers/ata/pata_it821x.c |4 drivers/ata/pata_via.c | 14 +++---

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-09-10 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |1 + drivers/ata/pata_it821x.c |4 drivers/ata/pata_via.c | 14 +++---

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes, some new ids, and a version bump that we discovered was missing from several drivers. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_generic.c |2

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-31 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes, some new ids, and a version bump that we discovered was missing from several drivers. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_generic.c |2

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes + more laptop IDs Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |7 ++- drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 18 +-

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-23 Thread Jeff Garzik
Fixes + more laptop IDs Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/libata-core.c |7 ++- drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c | 18 +-

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |9 - drivers/ata/libata-core.c |2 +- drivers/ata/pata_artop.c | 19

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-15 Thread Jeff Garzik
Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c |9 - drivers/ata/libata-core.c |2 +- drivers/ata/pata_artop.c | 19

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
The only non-fix are two sata_mv PCI ID additions. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c|2 +- drivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c |2 ++

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-07 Thread Jeff Garzik
The only non-fix are two sata_mv PCI ID additions. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to receive the following updates: drivers/ata/ata_piix.c|2 +- drivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c |2 ++

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
The only notable: GregKH wanted the pci_reenable_device() change associated with ata_piix to go in before the release, to avoiding release with an imperfect API. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to

[git patches] libata fixes

2007-08-01 Thread Jeff Garzik
The only notable: GregKH wanted the pci_reenable_device() change associated with ata_piix to go in before the release, to avoiding release with an imperfect API. Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus to

  1   2   3   >