On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
rather obvious oopsie.. once spotted.
> In case you wonder why the bug was so insidious, what this caused was two
> separate problems, both of them able to cause SIGSGV's.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > Not in my test tree. Same fault, and same trace leading up to it. no
>
> Ok.
>
> It definitely looks like a swapoff() problem.
>
> Have you ever seen the behaviour without running swapoff?
No.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linus Torvalds
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:19 AM
> To: Mike Galbraith
> Cc: Kernel Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Signal 11 - the continuing saga
>
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> Ehh, I think I found it.
>
> Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
>
> Oops.
>
> I'll bet you $5 USD (and these days, that's about a gadzillion Euros) that
Poor European Gérard as slim as 1.84 meter - 78 Kg these days.
What about old days poor European
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:35:57AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> Ehh, I think I found it.
>
> Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
>
> Oops.
>
> I'll bet you $5 USD (and these days, that's about a gadzillion Euros) that
> this explains it.
>
> Linus
Good. Sounds like you guys have a
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
In case you wonder why the bug was so insidious, what this caused was two
separate problems, both of them able to cause SIGSGV's.
One: we didn't mark the page table entry dirty like we were supposed to.
Two: by making
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> Not in my test tree. Same fault, and same trace leading up to it. no
Ok.
It definitely looks like a swapoff() problem.
Have you ever seen the behaviour without running swapoff?
Also, can you re-create it without running swapon() (if it's
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Lookin gat "swapoff()", it could easily be something like
> >
> > - swapoff walks theough the processes, marking the pages dirty
> >(correctly)
> > - swapoff goes on to the next swap entry,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Lookin gat "swapoff()", it could easily be something like
>
> - swapoff walks theough the processes, marking the pages dirty
>(correctly)
> - swapoff goes on to the next swap entry, and because it needs memory for
>this, the VM layer
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 07:17:41PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
> >>I have a tiny bash script that launches a Java swing app. If I run my
> >> script
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Rainer Mager wrote:
> Mike et al,
>
> I have no idea what IKD is and I don't know what to do with any results I
> might find BUT I'd be happy to do this if it will help. Please pass on the
> info with the instructions. Who should I report the results to?
IKD is a
Mike et al,
I have no idea what IKD is and I don't know what to do with any results I
might find BUT I'd be happy to do this if it will help. Please pass on the
info with the instructions. Who should I report the results to?
--Rainer
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
Give that man a cigarit was an env var (not LOCALE but LANG). I'd
actually checked this but I didn't think that made a difference in my case.
Thanks Linus, now can you fix the larger signal 11 problem?
--Rainer
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linus Torvalds
> I'd guess that the
Mike et al,
I have no idea what IKD is and I don't know what to do with any results I
might find BUT I'd be happy to do this if it will help. Please pass on the
info with the instructions. Who should I report the results to?
--Rainer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
Give that man a cigarit was an env var (not LOCALE but LANG). I'd
actually checked this but I didn't think that made a difference in my case.
Thanks Linus, now can you fix the larger signal 11 problem?
--Rainer
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linus Torvalds
I'd guess that the
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Rainer Mager wrote:
Mike et al,
I have no idea what IKD is and I don't know what to do with any results I
might find BUT I'd be happy to do this if it will help. Please pass on the
info with the instructions. Who should I report the results to?
IKD is a
On Tue, Dec 12, 2000 at 07:17:41PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff V. Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
I have a tiny bash script that launches a Java swing app. If I run my
script from an xterm
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Lookin gat "swapoff()", it could easily be something like
- swapoff walks theough the processes, marking the pages dirty
(correctly)
- swapoff goes on to the next swap entry, and because it needs memory for
this, the VM layer will swap
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Lookin gat "swapoff()", it could easily be something like
- swapoff walks theough the processes, marking the pages dirty
(correctly)
- swapoff goes on to the next swap entry, and because it
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Not in my test tree. Same fault, and same trace leading up to it. no
Ok.
It definitely looks like a swapoff() problem.
Have you ever seen the behaviour without running swapoff?
Also, can you re-create it without running swapon() (if it's
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
In case you wonder why the bug was so insidious, what this caused was two
separate problems, both of them able to cause SIGSGV's.
One: we didn't mark the page table entry dirty like we were supposed to.
Two: by making it
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 11:35:57AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ehh, I think I found it.
Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
Oops.
I'll bet you $5 USD (and these days, that's about a gadzillion Euros) that
this explains it.
Linus
Good. Sounds like you guys have a handle on
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Ehh, I think I found it.
Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
Oops.
I'll bet you $5 USD (and these days, that's about a gadzillion Euros) that
Poor European Gérard as slim as 1.84 meter - 78 Kg these days.
What about old days poor European Linus
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Linus Torvalds
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:19 AM
To: Mike Galbraith
Cc: Kernel Mailing List
Subject: Re: Signal 11 - the continuing saga
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
In case you
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Not in my test tree. Same fault, and same trace leading up to it. no
Ok.
It definitely looks like a swapoff() problem.
Have you ever seen the behaviour without running swapoff?
No.
Also, can
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hint: "ptep_mkdirty()".
g rather obvious oopsie.. once spotted.
In case you wonder why the bug was so insidious, what this caused was two
separate problems, both of them able to cause SIGSGV's.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Rainer Mager wrote:
> Thanks for the info...
>
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff V. Merkey
> > > So, is this related to the larger signal 11 problems?
> >
> > There's a corruption bug in the page cache somewhere, and it's 100%
> > reproducable. Finding it
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jeff V. Merkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
>> I have a tiny bash script that launches a Java swing app. If I run my
>> script from an xterm (or gnome-terminal or whatever) then it starts up fine.
>>
Thanks for the info...
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff V. Merkey
> > So, is this related to the larger signal 11 problems?
>
> There's a corruption bug in the page cache somewhere, and it's 100%
> reproducable. Finding it will be tough
Ok, granted this will be tough but
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Ok, I just upgraded to 2.4.0test12 (although I don't think there was any
> work in 12 that directly addresses this signal 11 problem). When compiling
> the new kernel I chose to disable AGPGart and RDM as
Hi again,
Ok, I just upgraded to 2.4.0test12 (although I don't think there was any
work in 12 that directly addresses this signal 11 problem). When compiling
the new kernel I chose to disable AGPGart and RDM as suggested by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will report later if this makes any
Hi again,
Ok, I just upgraded to 2.4.0test12 (although I don't think there was any
work in 12 that directly addresses this signal 11 problem). When compiling
the new kernel I chose to disable AGPGart and RDM as suggested by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will report later if this makes any
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
Hi again,
Ok, I just upgraded to 2.4.0test12 (although I don't think there was any
work in 12 that directly addresses this signal 11 problem). When compiling
the new kernel I chose to disable AGPGart and RDM as suggested by
Thanks for the info...
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff V. Merkey
So, is this related to the larger signal 11 problems?
There's a corruption bug in the page cache somewhere, and it's 100%
reproducable. Finding it will be tough
Ok, granted this will be tough but is
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jeff V. Merkey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 09:22:55AM +0900, Rainer Mager wrote:
I have a tiny bash script that launches a Java swing app. If I run my
script from an xterm (or gnome-terminal or whatever) then it starts up fine.
If,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Rainer Mager wrote:
Thanks for the info...
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeff V. Merkey
So, is this related to the larger signal 11 problems?
There's a corruption bug in the page cache somewhere, and it's 100%
reproducable. Finding it will be
36 matches
Mail list logo
