From what you wrote, I'd guess that you have not set up iptables to NAT
the LAN hosts. I'm afraid that what you posted did not answer this
definitively, but that was my fault; I asked for incomplete information
about iptables. NAT'ing is done not in the default (filter) table that
"iptables -nv
ping has a -I option that allows you to specify the source interface. I
haven't used this option myself, but I would guess Chadha used some
thing like this: 'ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1'.
Conway S. Smith
chuck wrote:
Dear Chadha:
In (4.) & (5.)...
I know how to ping from a host with an 'eth0' o
Oops. I just tried it, and it doesn't take an interface name (eth0),
but rather, the IP address for the interface. So instead of
ping -I eth0 192.168.1.1
it would be
ping -I xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 192.168.1.1
Where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP address of eth0.
Beolach wrote:
ping has a -I option that
Dear Chadha:
In (4.) & (5.)...
I know how to ping from a host with an 'eth0' or 'eth1' device.
I do not know how to ping from 'eth0' or from 'eth1'.
Sorry, I cannot help.
Chuck
"Chadha, Devesh" wrote:
> 4.Pinging 192.168.1.1 from eth0 gave destnation host unreachable and pinging
> xxx.xxx.x
Hello,
I recently got X working thanks to you guys ,
but when I run X, everytime w/o fail I get a message - Sound server
fatal error: cpu overload, aborting.
I run on Alsa 1.0.1rc2 and have an athlon 2400+ with an nforce mobo and
a geforce vga card.
from the time I changed to the 2.6 kernel,
It looks to me like you're iptables haven't been setup to NAT. I have
attached the output of 'iptables -nvL' on my NATing gateway. Just for
the heck of it I obscured my public address too. I used a slightly
modified version of the rc.firewall-stronger startup script from the
IP-Masquerade HO
Here are all the answers:
Chuck's questions:
My IP address is a public IP.
I think I am not NATing correctly and hence this problem.
ping -c 4 192.168.1.1 gives:
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1 icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.237 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1 icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.152 ms
64 bytes from 192.16
At 07:32 PM 1/21/2004 -0500, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
Well my reason for not giving is that it is a public IP and does not have
any firewalls in place. This exposes my server much more to unauthorized
"visit"
Anyway...lets get down to getting this done.
I am on RH Linux 8
uname -a is Linux 2.4.18
net
Hi, Chadha:
Originally, you said:
> I have a linux box with 2 NIC cards, both are properly configured.
> Both are on the same subnet, but still don't ping to one another!!
You do not show how you attempt the 'ping',
nor the error message.
Please show exact ping command attempt.
I was hoping f
Just delete "1024x768" under Modes and your eyes won't get tired any longer.
Regards
--
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read th
Well my reason for not giving is that it is a public IP and does not have
any firewalls in place. This exposes my server much more to unauthorized
"visit"
Anyway...lets get down to getting this done.
I am on RH Linux 8
uname -a is Linux 2.4.18
netstat -nr gives
192.168.1.0 0.0
At 04:52 PM 1/21/2004 -0500, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
[...]
Ray:
I have static IP and therefore I cannot give the actual IP address.
I don't understand why, unless for some reason you think that your IP
address is a secret. Once you start using the address for any purpose, it
will be known to everyo
Hello, Chadha:
You do not show how you attempt the 'ping',
nor the error message.
Please show exact ping command attempt.
Please show output of 'netstat -r -n'.
Both cards (should not, cannot) be on the same subnet
for the 'firewall/router' to function. The 'firewall/router'
should show a rou
Chuck,
Noted your and Ray's comments. I will get back with all the information
soon.
Ray:
I have static IP and therefore I cannot give the actual IP address.
All:
I am using the office ID and they append this disclaimer to every email.
Don't have any control on that. Sorry for the inconvenience.
At 10:23 AM 1/21/2004 -0500, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
Juan,
Eth0 has the external assigned IP by my ISP. Eth1 has a 192.168.x.x ip
address. Eth1 acts as the DHCP server for my LAN. My LAN is working fine. I
can connect machines to the LAN and even connect one machine to another.
But I cannot get eth1
You need to change :
HorizSync30.0 - 65.0
to
HorizSync30.0 - 75.0
i did it like that, and it worked fine !. Tell me if you could set it up.
good luck.
--
Facundo Suárez
Neuquén - Argentina
FDSoft
mail y jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From:
Thanks Richard,
I would try that!!
A little history..
I have tried the home network howto and the script given there, but it did
not work. I tried to understand iptables and write them myself, that didn't
work! I have now loaded firestarter firewallbut still no result.
I shall try your solut
mmm, the ask is, how are you trying to conect your lan to internet ? using
iptables ?, using squid?
What the system says if you execute "ifconfig" ?, are both up ?
You are goingo to need more than a dhcp server to share internet to your
lan. I guess you are goingo to use iptables at least.
S
On Wednesday 21 January 2004 16:23, Chadha, Devesh wrote:
> Juan,
>
> Eth0 has the external assigned IP by my ISP. Eth1 has a 192.168.x.x ip
> address. Eth1 acts as the DHCP server for my LAN. My LAN is working fine. I
> can connect machines to the LAN and even connect one machine to another.
>
> B
My eyes ask for yor help because they feel very tired. I cannot take X-Windows
at [EMAIL PROTECTED], I Know that my monitor and video card are able of this because
in Windows I can do it, I want to specify refresh rate to 75 instead of
60. ¿How can I do this??
XFree Version:XFree86-4.3.0-2.90.
Juan,
Eth0 has the external assigned IP by my ISP. Eth1 has a 192.168.x.x ip
address. Eth1 acts as the DHCP server for my LAN. My LAN is working fine. I
can connect machines to the LAN and even connect one machine to another.
But I cannot get eth1 to talk to eth0. I cannot connect the LAN to the
Sorry, i don't understand at all. You say that you have two cards, in the
same machine, are them in the same subnet ? why don't you put one, wich
connects to "outside" in one, and the other in another subnet?. I have
working a firewall/router with iptables, and the card is connected to de
adsl-mode
Hi,
I have a linux box with 2 NIC cards, both are properly configured. Both are
on the same subnet, but still don't ping to one another!!
I need to setup the box as the firewall/router that has eth0 set as external
and eth1 as internal serving as DHCP server to other computers on the
network. Bot
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 11:40, Hal MacArgle wrote:
> If PostFix does - I'll change to that but I can't seem to find any
> information about this in their docs, etc..
masquerade_domains = foo.example.com example.com
(http://www.postfix.org/rewrite.html)
--
Juan Carlos Inostroza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
24 matches
Mail list logo
