Hi Keerthy,
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:19:33PM +0530, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:42 PM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Guenter Roeck
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 15:21 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:04:30AM -0800, Guent
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 5:42 PM, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Guenter Roeck
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 15:21 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:04:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
>
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 07:12:13AM -0500, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Guenter Roeck
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 15:21 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:04:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Mark Br
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:25 AM, Guenter Roeck
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 15:21 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:04:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
>>
>> > > Why? It's not like hwmon has an unreasonably lar
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:55:45PM +0530, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Mark Brown
>> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:26:40AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>
>> >> +static ssize_t madc_read(struct device *dev,
>> >> +
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 02:55:45PM +0530, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Mark Brown
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:26:40AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> >> +static ssize_t madc_read(struct device *dev,
> >> + struct device_attribute *devattr, char *buf)
> >> +{
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:26:40AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig | 11 +
>> drivers/hwmon/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/hwmon/twl4030-madc.c | 794
>> ++
>
On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 15:21 -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:04:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > Why? It's not like hwmon has an unreasonably large core or similar.
>
> > Because it creates an unnecessar
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:04:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Why? It's not like hwmon has an unreasonably large core or similar.
> Because it creates an unnecessary dependency, and because it is not hwmon's
> responsibility to
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 07:07:13AM -0500, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:33:28PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(twl4030_madc_conversion);
> > [...]
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(twl4030_get_madc_conversion);
>
> > No symbol export from hwmon drivers. O
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:33:28PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> [...]
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(twl4030_madc_conversion);
> [...]
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(twl4030_get_madc_conversion);
> No symbol export from hwmon drivers. Other parts of the kernel
> should not depend on HWMON configuration.
Why?
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:26:40AM +0530, Keerthy wrote:
> ---
> drivers/hwmon/Kconfig| 11 +
> drivers/hwmon/Makefile |1 +
> drivers/hwmon/twl4030-madc.c | 794
> ++
> include/linux/i2c/twl4030-madc.h | 118 ++
> 4 files
12 matches
Mail list logo