On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:29:00 +0200
ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Thanks, I'll prepare them and resubmit
You can use the following branch which has accumulateed
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Thanks, I'll prepare them and resubmit
You can use the following branch which has accumulateed unmerged
mailbox patches.
git://gitorious.org/~doyu/lk/mainline.git
From: ext C.A, Subramaniam subramaniam...@ti.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:56:35 +0200
Hi Ohad/Hiroshi,
Good to see the new mailbox requirements. While we are at it can we add some
more :)?
* Make the mailbox
Hi Ohad,
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:43:21 +0200
Hi Hiroshi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
Does dspbridge really need its own defered
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
Fair enough.
Thanks, I'll prepare them and resubmit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Hi Ohad,
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 07:09:13 +0200
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
Fair enough.
Thanks, I'll prepare them and resubmit
You
Hi Ohad,
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:52:16 +0200
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat
; Kanigeri,
Hari; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Hi Ohad,
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:52:16 +0200
On Wed, Jun
; linux-
o...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Hi Ohad,
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 01:52:16 +0200
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:07
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
* Let's make sure no one accidentally registers two receivers on the
same time (which would result in one overwriting the other's callback
field).
I'd like to allow mutiple
Hi Hiroshi,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
Does dspbridge really need its own defered work for sending mailbox
messages?
We do, according to
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/38240
(thanks Rene for the explanation).
For
Hi Subbu,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:56 AM, C.A, Subramaniam
subramaniam...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Ohad/Hiroshi,
Good to see the new mailbox requirements. While we are at it can we add some
more :)?
...
Please provide your feedback!
Feel free to send the patches ;)
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
index 87e0cde..1b79b32 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static void
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
From: ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com
I think the best thing to do here is remove the spinlock, if not,
you are preventing that omap_mbox_msg_send be executed from a
tasklet or isr context. That maybe in
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 05:11:50 +0200
Hi Deepak,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Deepak Chitriki
From: ext Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:43:28 +0200
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com wrote:
From: ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com
I
: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 23:40:34 +0200
Hi Deepak,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Deepak Chitriki deepak.chitr...@ti.com
wrote
: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
From: ext Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 11:43:28 +0200
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Hiroshi DOYU hiroshi.d...@nokia.com
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
I think the best thing to do here is remove the spinlock
I'm afraid we can't do that: we need it to support OMAP4 syslink IPC
use cases which have multiple simultaneous sending contexts.
, if not, you are
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 04:54:55 +0200
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
I think the best thing to do here is remove the spinlock
I'm
: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 04:54:55 +0200
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Guzman Lugo, Fernando
fernando.l...@ti.com wrote:
I think the best thing to do
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
The underlying buffering implementation of mailbox
is converted from block API to kfifo due to the simplicity
and speed of kfifo.
The default size of the kfifo buffer is set to 256 bytes.
This value is configurable at compile time (via
CONFIG_OMAP_MBOX_KFIFO_SIZE), and can
Hi Deepak,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Deepak Chitriki deepak.chitr...@ti.com wrote:
With this patch I observed inconsistent lock state warning.
Thanks for the report!
Kfifo is acccessed in omap_mbox_msg_send() and mbox_tx_tasklet()
functions.In order to protect this critical section we
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:41 PM
To: Chitriki Rudramuni, Deepak; Guzman Lugo, Fernando; Ramirez Luna, Omar;
Kanigeri, Hari
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; Hiroshi Doyu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
Hi Deepak,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Deepak Chitriki deepak.chitr...@ti.com wrote:
With this patch I observed inconsistent lock state warning.
Thanks for the report!
Kfifo is acccessed in omap_mbox_msg_send() and mbox_tx_tasklet()
functions.In order
Hi Deepak,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Deepak Chitriki deepak.chitr...@ti.com wrote:
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
Somewhat relevant note about mailbox performance: omap_mbox_msg_send
often (i.e. when the kfifo is empty) can just send the message
directly, without triggering the tasklet to do
From: ext Guzman Lugo, Fernando fernando.l...@ti.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:14:41 +0200
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Ohad Ben-Cohen [mailto:o...@wizery.com]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 4:41 PM
To: Chitriki
From: ext Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] omap: mailbox: convert block api to kfifo
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 05:11:50 +0200
Hi Deepak,
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Deepak Chitriki deepak.chitr...@ti.com
wrote:
Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
Somewhat relevant note about
28 matches
Mail list logo
