Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-19 Thread Komuro
: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io() Hey, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 09:50:31PM +0900, Komuro wrote: Also on re-inserting the card (with 2.6.36-rc4+ as of today)? I tried

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-19 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Nothing relating to setting CISREG_COR (at least on pcnet_cs) changed, and serial_cs does not modify CISREG_COR on such pseudo-multifunction devices. Would it be possible for you to re-check plain 2.6.35 and 2.6.35 with the pcmcia patchset availble at

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-18 Thread Komuro
Hi, With this patch, fmvj18x_cs based card works (both network and serial). but Serial part of Xircom card still does not work. I think the reason is irq or io_width or io_lines is not setuped properly for Xircom-card by pcmcia_core. Hey, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:48:32AM +0900, Komuro

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-18 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Hey, On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 07:20:31PM +0900, Komuro wrote: With this patch, fmvj18x_cs based card works (both network and serial). good. Will push the patch upstream, then. but Serial part of Xircom card still does not work. Also on re-inserting the card (with 2.6.36-rc4+ as of today)? I

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-18 Thread Komuro
Hi, Also on re-inserting the card (with 2.6.36-rc4+ as of today)? I tried the 2.6.36-rc4-git4. The serial part still does not work, before and after re-inserting the card. elese we wouldn't see the is a 16550A message, right? Even if the COR(Configuration Option Register) of irq is not

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-17 Thread Komuro
@lists.infradead.org, linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io() Dear Komuro, does the attached patch help with 2.6.36-rc4? Best, Dominik commit 1852d6b8c3fa2d1765f66cd7d96a8c6bf9f01997 Author: Dominik Brodowski li

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-17 Thread Komuro
...@dominikbrodowski.net To: Komuro komurojun-...@nifty.com Cc: linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io() Dear Komuro, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:06:51PM +0900, Komuro wrote: Xircom

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-07 Thread Komuro
Hi, Attached file is the output of /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control. kernel 2.6..36-rc3. xirc2pcs_cs multi-function card. # filename:lineno [module]function flags format arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perfctr-watchdog.c:244 [perfctr_watchdog]write_watchdog_counter - setting %s to -0x%08Lx\012

Re: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH 11/18] pcmcia: do not use io_req_t when calling pcmcia_request_io()

2010-09-07 Thread Dominik Brodowski
Dear Komuro, On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:24:30PM +0900, Komuro wrote: Attached file is the output of /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control. Could you issue $ echo module pcmcia +p /sys/kernel/debug/dynamic_debug/control and (re-)insert the card, and then send the dmesg (probably $ dmesg