file
> raid145-0.36.3-2.0.30.gz
if you are creating a new array, you'll be better off with the 19981110
patch from http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/. (download
raidtools 0.90 from this directory too!)
-- mingo
k w/ versions 19981106 and 1108.
thanks for the report, i've finally found the bug, this was a longstanding
bug, and i'm glad it's gone now. The LVM related rewrite made the
'autorun' part more robust, and this popped up the bug. (earlier this bug
went unnoticed) I'v
I've been currently looking into some of the scsi-to-eide raid solutions
being offered. The example that I will use here is the product located at
http://www.electronix.com/raid/.
In this setup you have a eide raid5 system with 6-10 drives, each drive
has its own channel.
So what I'm wonder is,
An issue which I'm pondering atm is how to approach partitioning with a
system that might have raid1 added to it.
The box is currently set up as follows:
Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity Mounted on
/dev/sda1 498900 20590 452543 4% /
/dev/sda6
Good day -
I'm busy experimenting with the hot add/remove facility of the
19981005-B-0.90 raidtools and associated kernel patch.
Needed to read up on the archies to find some documentation, and a couple
of questions remain unanswered - here's hoping someone can fill me in:
(I can't play around
| I am running RedHat version 5.1 (kernel 2.0.35)
| and have pulled down the patch file
| raid145-0.36.3-2.0.30.gz
make sure you have the 'kernel-source' RPM installed (or just go grab the
source from ftp.kernel.org or a mirror). if you grab the source, untar it in
a directory (this is typical
>On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Chris J. Magnuson wrote:
>
>> Here are some stats on a 16-bit fast wide single-channel ICP Vortex PCI
>> RAID-5 card on a 3-drive array.
>>
>> The drives are Fujitsu 9.1 Gig narrow M2949 drives (14.x Meg/sec
>> theoretical limit on speed). The system is a 233MHz Supermicro Pe
FWIW, Bonnie stats for single-PII-350MHz, AIC7890 v5.1.2, raid-981005,
and 3 9GB Seagate Barracudas (7200 rpm U2W). The machine was under
normal 18:00 load (a few users still in the office, mail and general
disk access) during the benchmark.
---Sequential Output ---Sequ
Hi
We seem to get these messages periodically on our setup:
PM3334UDW, PM2144UW, 14-bay rack mount DPT RAID cabinet,
Redhat Linux 5.1 with 2.1.127 kernel (happened with 2.0.35 too).
ASUS Gigabyte 100MHZ (Intel 440BX) with dual P2-400s under SMP
These message is:
Nov
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I cannot find anywhere the
notes on how to apply the raid patch to my kernel src
files.
I am running RedHat version 5.1 (kernel 2.0.35)
and have pulled down the patch file
raid145-0.36.3-2.0.30.gz
Having looked at the raid FAQ and HOWTO notes, I am
still lost as to ho
On Sat, 7 Nov 1998, Stephen Costaras wrote:
> Seeing as we're all using RAID here, someone might know how to eek
> better performance out of a I/O subsystem.
>
> I'm using a Dual PPro system (Tyan S1668) with 3 Mylex KT-958
> controllers. Each controller has 3 Seagate Barracuda ST15150W
> drive
On Sun, 8 Nov 1998, Chris J. Magnuson wrote:
> Here are some stats on a 16-bit fast wide single-channel ICP Vortex PCI
> RAID-5 card on a 3-drive array.
>
> The drives are Fujitsu 9.1 Gig narrow M2949 drives (14.x Meg/sec
> theoretical limit on speed). The system is a 233MHz Supermicro Pentium
I jsut dl'd the raid 2.1.127 patch. when I applied it against the stock
2.1.127 kernel, I got a .rej. on md.c I think. Just thought someone
would like to know :P
Btw, 2.1.125 one works great, cant wait fer 2.1.127 as 2.1.127 has
updated AIC7XXX drivers.
Wayde
On Mon, Nov 09, 1998 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Anthony Hams thusly shaped the electrons:
>
[...]
> I just installed the newest raid-patches (19981106-C) into a 2.0.35
> kernel, and I also use the newest tools (19981105-0.90).
>
> I gave all my raid-partitions the 0xfd type, but the kernel only finds
Hello all -
I have set up a raid1 array with two 3-gig partitions, both on separate
scsi drives. What formula do I need to use to determine the most
efficient chunk-size? Currently I am using 8k (I think). In /etc/raidtab
I have:
chunk-size 8
Is this correct?
Rob
I reported this last week, but thought I'd send in an update. I've been
running a RAID 5 array w/ kernel 2.1.125 & raid 19981005. When I upgraded to
19981105, autostart stopped working. It has continued to not work w/ versions
19981106 and 1108.
To fix some fs corruption that occured last w
16 matches
Mail list logo
