On Sat, 13 Feb 1999, Chris Price wrote:
> So Micheal, WHERE IS THIS BLOODY INFO DOCUMENTED?? HUH Do we
> need to wait until you or some other 'sage' member of this group decides
> to bless us with their info, or will you guys start making some half-assed
> docs? (hey, I already have i
i consistently get active inode messages trying to mkraid under 2.0.36
i have solved this two ways.
1. i found that one of the december 2.0.35
patches worked fine under mkraid. i used 2.0.35 to install the raids, then
upgraded to .36 after (upgraded the raidtools as well)
2. once or twice, if
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999, Till Mommsen wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> got a problem again (Kernel 2.0.36 with the raid0145-19990128-2.0.36,
> raidtools 0.9):
> What happened so far:
> Installed Linux on sda1-6, patched the Kernel, installed RAID Tools,
> realized that RAID has to be set up from a diff
Hello again,
got a problem again (Kernel 2.0.36 with the raid0145-19990128-2.0.36,
raidtools 0.9):
What happened so far:
Installed Linux on sda1-6, patched the Kernel, installed RAID Tools,
realized that RAID has to be set up from a different disk, therefore
attached an old DIE disk, moved in
Hi Chris,
maybe this is the sort of feedback you are looking for. Quick info on my
profile: quite exp. Windows Sys Admin, converting to Linux. No Linux
experience until recently. Had to set up a Server, RAID1 was a "must". Had
to struggle my way through command lines etc. and am doing this now f
On Sat, Feb 13, 1999 at 11:42:47PM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
> > Is anyone in the "linux-raid community" being paid to do research work
> > for redhat? If so, they should probably keep redhat informed. If not, I
> > think it's fair to expect redhat to do their own work.
>
> Are you daft, or
At 16:37 12.02.99 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi there.
>
>First of all, I have been looking through a lot of documents today - I am
>sorry if I missed one that covers my question - please point it to me if
>that is the case.
Maybe
http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/ALPHA/linux-ha/High-Availability-HOWTO.ht
Date:Sat, 13 Feb 1999 23:47:12 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED
hi ya "raid gurus"
I've collected some docs of lastest/raid docs stuff
think about 2 or three people posted their versions...
( unfortunately I did not keep copies from before )
I made my version too so that I can remember what I did
to get my stuff running...
- yes..am willing to help documen
So Micheal, WHERE IS THIS BLOODY INFO DOCUMENTED?? HUH Do we
need to wait until you or some other 'sage' member of this group decides
to bless us with their info, or will you guys start making some half-assed
docs? (hey, I already have in my own small way, see my RAID1 cookbook of
a
> As for notifying redhatI'd suggest sending the raid announcements
> and stuff to someone's attention and they might redirect it to the
> right people etc... ??? ( so it'd be in their hands - what they do
> is a separate issue )
>
> have fun
> alvin
I agree wholeheartedly. A smal
> Is anyone in the "linux-raid community" being paid to do research work
> for redhat? If so, they should probably keep redhat informed. If not, I
> think it's fair to expect redhat to do their own work.
>
> Mike Stone
>
Are you daft, or were you drunk when you wrote this... Saying th
12 matches
Mail list logo
