ALASKA MAGAZINE in their July 98 issue says "The best source of
information on snowmachining is Alaska's Snowmachiners'
Directory. Published once a year, this glossy magazine is loaded
with information vital to planning a winter vacation in Alaska"
Alaska's Snowmachiners' Directory is the
Hello,
We systematically get a 'Out of memory' error trying to make a 32Gb
filesystem on a RAID5 disk.
This problem did not occur using the linux-2.1.131ac9 + raid0145-121499
combination.
During the creation of the superblocks, mkfs slows down and stops with
"out-of-memory". How many copies
Summary:
RAID5 over loopback devices fails with random virtual
disk corruption.
[If you're wondering why I was doing this - it was
to test the general stability of Linux-RAID + SMP
without actually buying another bunch of SCSI disks ...]
Setup:
kernel 2.2.1 + RAID0145
What the hell are you folks talking about? I hate to be annoying, but
Ingo Molnar works for Red Hat. Stephen Tweedie works for Red Hat. Both
are on this list and are heavily involved with RAID and RAID issues. I'm
on this list (though I don't read it as much as I'd like to).
That said, the
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Feb 1999 18:14:14 -0500, Michael Stone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Feb 10, 1999 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Chris Price wrote:
Instead of pointing fingers at Redhat, I would ask if there is
someone with teh Linux-raid community that actively corresponds with
redhat to let them
Hi,
We have a server having 4 SCSI disks on a AdacRAID SCSI controller
(from the SCSI BIOS we make a RAID5 system), and a AHA-7880 SCSI
controller holding a SCSI CD-ROM and a HP-TAPE driver.
We want to install LINUX on it but we can't see the AdacRAID controller
label while boot. It only
just to add one more point, i was waiting for 2.2 to stabilize before
moving the RAID driver to 2.2.x. But when patches began floating around
porting the RAID driver to 2.2.x, i rather decided to move the 'official'
patch to 2.2.x too. This resulted in at least two bogus 'RAID-problems' so
far:
hi ya ingo
just to add one more point, i was waiting for 2.2 to stabilize before
moving the RAID driver to 2.2.x. But when patches began floating around
i picked up the 2.2.0 stuff...seems to work okay for me with 2.2.1 kernel...
but I did not test thoroughly
think like any new sw, it will
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
unavoidable. Still waiting for someone with better documentation skills
than mine to pick the maintainance of RAID-docs up :)
I would be more than willing to do this, but I admittedly know
very little about linux-raid. I would be more than
Sorry if i am going way off topic here, if this is
the case please insult me personally.
On Mon, Feb 15, 1999 at 02:31:13PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
Umm, Ingo Molnar == [EMAIL PROTECTED] I think we can assume that there
is somebody working for Red Hat who knows a bit about the current
Alexander Kjeldaas wrote:
Is there a way to have the first partition of a hard-disk cover the
MBR? The reason I'm interested in this is to make it easier to install
lilo properly on a set of disks where the first partition is raid-1.
astor
The MBR consists of bootstrap code, and the
I could offer some small help with RAID 5 documentation/setups
I've got two small arrays that i've been running here for some
time (34GB 51GB). Under linux 2.0.36/2.2.0..
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Chris Price [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
Hi folks
I can share with you my experience on setup a Raid 1 system.
I've done al lot of test with RH 5.2, Kernel 2.0.36 +
raid0145-121519998/01081999/01281999
I've tested my L.B. with 16-18 xterm open...with 12 users compiling 2.0.36
with Gimp working with a 1024*1024 image at 16Ml color
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the hell are you folks talking about? I hate to be annoying, but
Hold on to your Hat!
That said, the latest *stable* RAID tools as of the release of RH 5.2
are *in* RH 5.2. No, there are no updates to them as some of the work
since then
14 matches
Mail list logo
