It came up. I had module deps problems, so I went init 1, then
on my way back to init 3 I got a kernel panic. Don't know if
it's related to raid though. I somehow doubt it.
I would just feel a whole lot better if someone released a patch
for 2.2.2 that applied without any fixing.
-jeremy
>
*sigh* I know. I know :-) But it works so well in a production
environment and well it's about 10g's less then the next best thing.
-jeremy
>
> Ahh, but that would imply that it wasn't alpha software. one must
> remember that however stable it is, those who know have yet to release
> r
I believe I read in the RAID HowTo that you shouldn't put swap memory on a
RAID; the swap daemon stripes it automatically over multiple partitions.
Don't know if it's anywhere near redundant though.
-Robin
>Hi,
>
>I heard that actually soft-raid for Linux can't swap over a /dev/md*
>device.
>
>
My apologies, sent this to the wrong list.
Michael
> > Well, let me out it this way, is not that is old news but
> > rather a very old
> > version of SSH.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I heard that actually soft-raid for Linux can't swap over a /dev/md*
device.
Someone suggests that putting enough RAM into a box, can avoid swapping,
but I think it is safe to have some swap space, in the case a process
eats up much
memory for short time, to prevent that pages of executable
>. Hopefully an officially "stable" version can
> find it's way into the kernel before NT5.0 becomes a reality... although
> that's probably not too much of a chalenge!
>
don't think you need to worry. As with all there products, it will
only become another "un-reality" we have to deal with. :-)
On Tue, Feb 23, 1999 at 05:43:15PM -, Bruno Prior wrote:
> It's not bullet-proof, but couldn't you get a reasonable degree of fault-tolerance
> with the following RAID-1 setup:
>
> Install LILO on the MBR of both disks. On the second disk's lilo.conf, use the
> bios=0x80 trick to make sure yo
For anyone who may have tried to test the 0.96 driver I released a few
days ago--I forgot to change one last thing in the megaraid.h that I put
out, effectively
making the MULTI_IO flag useless. The following patch, applied to the 0.96
megaraid.h
will make the multi-io support work: (if you aren
Yup... Don't get me wrong, I love this stuff... Ever since I saw DiskSuite
I knew I wanted it on Linux... and thanks to some very talented people on
this list, we don't have long to wait.
I think this is a good weapon in the battle to target workgroup servers
currently dominated by NT... Hopeful
I'd say that if it didn't barf right away it's probably not too
significant is there somone on the list that can give is a definitive
answer... There's at least 2 versions stated to be correct (OK, I'm not
exactly an authority but it looks right to me)... and one thats definitely
not right bu
Ahh, but that would imply that it wasn't alpha software. one must
remember that however stable it is, those who know have yet to release
raidtools 1.0 and nomatter how much good it is... one should remember
that.
It has proven itself to be really nice in my experience, but I might
hesitate
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 08:29:40 -0500
Hi folks,
This could make a pretty good howto if it has a happy ending.
I got a mylex dac960 card to drive an external rack with 5-9gb scsi
drives. RH5.2 (2.0.36) already is installed, on an ide hard drive.
Col
Ahhh, err don't think so.
sector size has nothing to do with partition "type" I haven't studied the
code and am not really a C programmer (I have done mostly Assembly
language, but in the past and not X86) ... My interpretation was that it
should just be :-
> add_partition(hd, current_min
13 matches
Mail list logo
