On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Richard Jones wrote:
> The stress test script is attached so people can try
> this out for themselves.
I tried this test script with kernel 2.2.3 and the RAID patch dated
19990309. I let it run for almost 4 hours with 8 processes on a machine
with the following configurat
I am willing to pay a high hourly rate for someone who understands
the raid5.c code to help me understand it. I need help urgently,
as soon as possible.
I'm a C programmer and I need to make some modifications to the linux
raid code for my own project whose deadline is fast approaching.
I'm th
Hello all,
I was wondering who does the raidtools debian package?
Thanks,
Dan DeMond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Greetings,
Is there some definitive documentation, somewhere, which covers expanding
a Linear Concatenation? What specific utilities are required?
Within Software Raid mini HOWTO at:
http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/docs/HOWTO/mini/Software-RAID
Miguel De Icaza writes:
> I changed the ext2fs
Going through the RAID install sheet, it says that after you turn on block
devices and RAID support in the kernel, upon reboot, you should see
something like the following in /proc/mdstat:
Personalities : [1 linear] [2 raid0]
read_ahead not set
md0 : inactive
md1 : inactive
md2 : inactive
md3 : i
I have also experienced file system corruption with 2.2.4. The problem most
likely lies in the /fs/buffer.c file which the raid patch had a conflict
with.
<>< Lance.
Tony Wildish wrote:
> this sound to me like bad memory. I had a very similar problem recently
> and it was a bad SIMM. I was luc
i get about 22-24MB/s across 3 IBM UW drives according to bonnie.
(reading and writing), and over 200 seeks/sec.
64MB ram.
1x 9.1GB IBM DGHS09U uw
2x 4.3GB DDRS uw
Buslogic BT-958.
K6 233MHz.
TMC TI5VG+ board (via mvp3, 1MB cache).
regards,
Paul Jakma.
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
try ftp.XX.kernel.org where XX=your country code, i.e \"us\".
look in the /pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha dir.
you should patch kernel with the latest avail \"raid0145\" patch from there, and
use a raidtools of similar date from there. use jakob\'s raid-howto that comes
with the latest raid tools.
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone have a clue about what could be going on ?? The main
> difference between my own box which ran a similar configuration for long
> time seems to be that this box is a K6.Anyone running raid0 on similar
> configurations with a K6
Re!
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hardware:
> 2 x IBM UltraStar 9ES 4.5 GB U2W
> Adaptec 2940 UW
> AMD K6 - 200 MHz
> 64 MB RAM
>
> Each disk gives us around 11 MB/s using hdparm -t /dev/sd[ab]
>
> If we run hdparm -t /dev/sda & hdparm -t /dev/sdb, (two hdparm's
Hi everyone,
Where can I get the latest raidtools source?
Are there any patches out to this latest source, or is it in itself the most
stable?
Thanks
Ricardo
This message powered by EMUmail. http://EMUmail.com
Hi all !
I promised to show off RAID on a friend's box. Ok, so we set up
2.2.3 with corrosponding patches on his box with the following
hardware:
2 x IBM UltraStar 9ES 4.5 GB U2W
Adaptec 2940 UW
AMD K6 - 200 MHz
64 MB RAM
Each disk gives us around 11 MB/s using hdparm -t /dev/sd[a
Hello,
this sound to me like bad memory. I had a very similar problem recently
and it was a bad SIMM. I was lucky enough to have four SIMMS in the
machine so I can still run with only two, having removed the bad SIMM and
its partner.
Two suggestions:
Try booting with the 'mem=xxxM' option t
I'm about to embark on the path of a RAID-1 Software RAID for a server.
I'd like to use the 2.2.4 (or greater) kernel because I want the features
of 2.2.x and 2.2.3 (and previous) had a DOS TCP/IP problem. However,
looking at all the docs, it seems patches only exist through 2.2.3 for
software RAI
14 matches
Mail list logo
