mkraid: Aborted.. done patch/0.90

OK, Now I really go mad: I've got the descructive problem of mkraid going to abort without leaving any hints in syslog / mdstat.. I'm working with the linux 2.2.6 kernel AND did the patch raid0145-19990421-2.2.6 AND have raid-0.90-19990421-2.2.6 installed I couldn't find any other hints in

Re: mkraid: Aborted.. done patch/0.90

What setup ? How big are the partitions ? Raid level 1, partitions of 710Meg further more I hacked trough the code and came to the conclusion that it crashed on (yes, it's true) -- /dev/md0: Invalid Argument And again: modules are loaded, patch is loaded, using 0.90 and 2.2.6 GreeTzz +

Adaptec Ultra2 RAID card

Maybe I missed a thread on this a month ago when the press releases hit, but does anybody know if work is being done to produce Linux drivers for Adaptec's Ultra2 RAID series of controllers? The single-channel flavor is selling at a fraction the cost of other similar LVDS RAID controllers, so I

RE: Adaptec Ultra2 RAID card

The part numbers are AAA-131U2 (single-channel), AAA-133U2 (triple-channel), ARO-1130U2 (RAIDport III) and AAC-364 (quad-channel high-performance). They have specs posted at http://www.adaptec.com/products/promos/targ_u2raid.html on their web site. Buysoftware Network, BuyComp.com, Buy Now

RAID 1 and RH 6.0

Title: RAID 1 and RH 6.0 I am considering using RH 6.0 to replace a few of my NT file servers, but I do have heavy reservations about using this OS because of the difficulty I am having in setting up RAID 1 with my test system. If someone could please answer a few questions, I would be deeply

Problem with installing RAID0

Hi, I've tried to build a RAID0 system in the last days. But there is a problem that I don't understand. These are the information about the system: - PII/400 - 128 MB Ram - 4.3 GB IDE for system/user etc - 2 x 9.1 GB UW-SCSI to build an 18GB file server with RAID0 (/dev/sdb1 and

Raid 0 Performance, Vanilla Kernel vs. Latest Patches

Are there any significant differences with either performance or reliability of raid 0 with the latest patches vs. the raid support in vanilla 2.2.9? Most of the discussion of improvements I've been able to see from lurking here and searching through the archive deal with raid levels 1, 4, and

Questions about Adaptec 3970 raid under Linux

Hi all, I am rather new to raid, and SCSI in general actually. a local computer retailer is selling an adaptec PCI 3970 dual u2w raid controler and I am wondering how difficult this is to setup with Linux. I found no reference to Adaptec raid in the raid-howto so am hoping someone here will

RE: RAID 1 and RH 6.0

1. I have two versions of a Software-RAID HOWTO on my system which are totally different in their scope. There were essentially two versions of raid - that which worked with the 2.0 Linux kernel and the news stuff that works with the 2.1/2.2 series kernel. The docs that are in

Re: patches for 2.2.9?

On Sun, 30 May 1999, Luca Berra wrote: dunno about 2.2.9-ac1 but for 2.2.8 and 2.2.9 raid will not resync. indeed... 2.2.9-ac1 doesn't sync either. neither does 2.2.7-ac4. Something must have broken in one of linus's 2.2.8-pre patches as one of the features of 2.2.7-ac4 was a sync with

Re: patches for 2.2.9?

At 23:58 01.06.99 +0100, Paul Jakma wrote: 2.2.9-ac1 doesn't sync either. neither does 2.2.7-ac4. Something must have broken in one of linus's 2.2.8-pre patches as one of the features of 2.2.7-ac4 was a sync with linus. i'm sticking with 2.2.7-ac1 :) 2.2.7-ac2 also works, 2.2.7-ac3 fails.