Dear all,
I have a hot-plug SCSI modules installed in my Linux system. And
I have two SCSI HD are running in RAID-1. One of the HDs fail. And I put
back a new HD for replacement! How can I resync them?
My current conf:
RH 6.2
One '/' parition only
two HD mirror the '/'
Afte
Jason Lin wrote:
>
> I don't want to loose the data in /dev/hda7, so
> mkraid --really-force /dev/md0 is not a right thing to
> do.
> What should I do with this problem?
> Thanks.
>
> Jason
>
> cat /etc/raidtab
> raiddev /dev/md0
> raid-level 1
> nr-raid-disks
Hi there:
Appreciate all the replies I got. One more question.
[root@hostb120 /]# mkraid /dev/md0
handling MD device /dev/md0
analyzing super-block
disk 0: /dev/hda7, 514048kB, raid superblock at
513984kB
/dev/hda7 appears to contain an ext2 filesystem -- use
-f to override
mkraid: aborted, see
Sorry about the previous posting, I hit hit send pre-maturely.
I plan to put 4 9Gb disks into a RAID array. I want more than one file
system on this array so I decided to partition each disk and create
multiple software raid arrays. Each raid array would have exactly one
device entry for each p
I plan to put 4 9Gb disks into a RAID array. I want more than one file
system on this array so I decided to partition each disk and create
multiple software raid arrays. Each raid array would have exactly one
device entry for each physical disk (I included a copy of my raidtab
file if that expan
Antigen for Exchange found Happy99.exe infected with W32/Ska.A.Worm virus.
The file is currently Deleted. The message, "controller failure hosed raid5
array :-(", was
sent from Gabor Tjong A Hung and was discovered in Public Folders\NAV for
Microsoft Exchange-MONTANA\Quarantine
located at E-DIALO
hmm. first change this:
> device /dev/hdc6
> raid-disk 1
> failed-disk 1
to this:
> device /dev/hdc6
> failed-disk 1
then change the partition types of both chunks back to 83 (not fd). then
reboot. check /p
i have found that on raid 1, chunk size does not matter for performance. what
matters more seems to be the block size option to mke2fs. i make my mysql
stores with chunksize 16, and run mke2fs with -R stride=4 -b 4096
allan
Erich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> I looked through the documentation
Erich,
I am planning on trying to use the Promise Ultra66 tonight (want to beef
up performance). I currently have RAID5 running with a Promise
EIDE-MaxII card quite nicely. I know about the 2.2.14-B1 patch for
RAID, but which promise patch are you referring to? I see that Promise
has a beta dr
Ok, here are the notes that I wrote to myself of how to get Software
RAID and the Promise Ultra/66 in the same kernel:
1. Don't use the RedHat version of the 2.2.14 kernel. It has
too many patches, so the other patches won't work.
2. Do unpack the linux-2.2.14.tar.gz file.
3. Apply the ide.2.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 12:06:47PM -0700, Erich wrote:
> I looked through the documentation, and I can't find any good
> information about what the chunk size should be in a mirrored
> configruation. I'm using three disks in a Level 1 configuration. The
well, from the man page:
chunk-si
> It's definitely possible to use 2.2.14 with the Software RAID patch
> and with the Promise Ultra/66 patch at the same time. I'm doing it
> right now. Download the plain-vanilla 2.2.14 kernel. Apply this
> patch first:
>
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hedrick/old/ide.2.2.14
>
Antigen for Exchange found Happy99.exe infected with W32/Ska.A.Worm virus.
The file is currently Deleted. The message, "controller failure hosed raid5
array :-(", was
sent from Gabor Tjong A Hung and was discovered in Public Folders\NAV for
Microsoft Exchange-MONTANA\Quarantine
located at E-DIALO
I looked through the documentation, and I can't find any good
information about what the chunk size should be in a mirrored
configruation. I'm using three disks in a Level 1 configuration. The
data on the disks will be a MySQL database, and a bunch of files. Any
hints on an appropriate chunk s
I'm the one who originally posted the question, and now I may have an
answer (with help from the list):
> I've tried doing that, 2.2.14 adding both patchs.
> mostly they failed everywhere. then once I did it get it in, and compile,
> it still never worked right, I change to 2.3 kernel, even tho
mkraid /dev/md0
But I get md2 running instead of md0.
Does anyone know why and how to fix it?
Thanks.
Jason
[root@hostb120 /root]# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid1]
read_ahead 1024 sectors
md2 : active raid1 hdc6[1] hda6[0] 3028096 blocks
[2/2] [UU]
unused devices:
[root@hostb120 /r
On Fri, 14 Apr 2000, Tony Grant wrote:
> Erich wrote:
>
> > Any clues? I feel like I've done everything according to the
> > instructions, and I feel like I'm very close to getting it to work,
> > but it's still not working. Have I left out something important in
> > the kernel config? Or
Did you try the --really--force switch? My syntax:-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Anthony Di Paola
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2000 5:20 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Problems with the Persistent superblock
>
>
>
> the SCSI bus on one side and emulate one disk, and on the other do
> hardware raid5 across 4 - 8 UDMA buses?
>
>
> I ask because, while not normally somthing I would do, I need
> to rig a large storage array in an evil environ. No way am I mounting
> eight > 1K$ each drives in a mobile
I reported this bug to linux-raid on March 27 and to linux-kernel
a week later and had zero responses from either. In case my previous
message was too long, here it is again in brief.
Kernel 2.2.14 + raid-2.2.14-B1 as shipped with Red Hat 6.x.
RAID5 across multiple SCSI disks.
Spin down one disk
Hi list,
I'm playing around with RAID-0 on an Compaq DS10 with an Alpha
processor running Kernel 2.2.14 + raid-2.2.14-B1 patch.
When I try to do autodetection on my RAID partition I fail:
- I put autodetection support into the kernel.
- I created /dev/md0 with persistent superblock
- Since
"Gary E. Miller" wrote:
> I just noticed two new files at:
> http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/
>
> They are:
> raid-2.3.99-5-A1
> raid-2.3.99-5-B1
>
> A1 seems to add just the autodetect stuff and B1 the rest of it.
Been there done that...
Broken on my ma
Erich wrote:
> Any clues? I feel like I've done everything according to the
> instructions, and I feel like I'm very close to getting it to work,
> but it's still not working. Have I left out something important in
> the kernel config? Or did I need a RAID patch to the 2.2.14 kernel to
> get
23 matches
Mail list logo
