> 2 Masters from the ASUS P3C2000 CDU Board, 2 Masters on a CMD648
> based PCI controller and 4 Masters on a 3Wave 4 port RAID
> Controller. I don't use the 3Wave as a RAID controller though, just
> as a very good 4 channel Ultra66 board. They also make an 8 channel
> board, and that's what I'm go
I am running Red Hat 6.1 on this particular computer which appears
to have raidtools v0.90, etc . . . all the latest working patches.
I had two mirrored partitions that were 8 & 6GB and we needed a 14GB
partition. Rather than repartitioning the disks (and having to
reinstalling the system), I
I had the same problem. My fdisk list types didn't show an fd or 0xfd
selection.
Also, beware of the 2.2.11 kernel. I installed it and the result was
enormous memory leakage, and I think I read somewhere that this is a known
problem with this particular kernel.
Chris
> >
> > Hi there
> >
>
Michael Hothorn wrote:
>
> Hi there
>
> I've just installed RAID1 with kernel 2.2.11 and raidtools 0.90. two
> disks (/dev/sda3 and /dev/sdb2/) are mirrored. Everything is running jsut
> fine. I read the manual to configure autodetection, but there were just
> some short comments.
>
> 1. I've
The coolest guy you know wrote:
> Clay Claiborne wrote:
> >
> > For what its worth, we recently built an 8 ide drive 280GB raid5 system.
> > Benchmarking with HDBENCH we got 35.7MB/sec read and 29.87MB/sec write. With
> > DBENCH and 1 client we got 44.5 MB/sec with 3 clients it dropped down to
Hello y'all ,
I have been subscribed to the RAID mailing list for a while and am
interested in the
general too'ing and fro'ing withing this list but it's all getting too
much for my mailer .
Is there a digest for the RAID mailing list a la LKML ? if not could one
be set-up ?
Toodle-pip
Amias
[Jason Lin]
> After my raid-1 is up and running I shutdown the
> machine and took out one hard disk.(the one without
> Linux installed.) Just to see how it behaves.
> During reboot it drops to single user mode due to RAID
> device error.
>
> "raidstart /dev/md0"
raidstart? eww :)
> modprobe: ca
At 11:36 26.04.00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Stay away from the ``dangerous'' code.
>So should I use the older raidtools at kernel.org? What are people using?
I'm using raidtools from kernel.org (...0824... if I recall correctly) and
2.2.14 kernel patch from
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/rai
>> Under
>> , the file is labeled "dangerous". But I can't use
>> the 2.2.11 code under kernel.org 'cause 2.2.11 has that nasty little TCP
>> memory leak bug
>
>Stay away from the ``dangerous'' code.
So should I use the older raidtools at kernel.org? What are people using?
Regards,
Brian
In
>All the RAID code is "dangerous" even the old 0.40 stuff. The 2.2.11 patch
>works all the way up to 2.2.13, for 2.2.14 you need Ingo's patch from the
>above site. RAIDtools-0.90 is the version you want.
So do I take Ingo's raidtools or the one on kernel.org? Sorry for repeating
the question, b
> In the last 24 hours ive been getting them when e2fsck runs after
> rebooting. Usual cause of rebooting is irq causeing lockup, or endlessly
> trying looping trying to get an irq.
>
> Im convinced its my hpt366 controller, ive mentioned my problem in a few
> channels, no luck yet.
>
> I used
11 matches
Mail list logo
