On Wed, Jun 21, 2000 at 12:06:04AM +0200, Jochen Haeberle wrote:
>
> Things work fine on the raid arrays after synchronizing finished. A
> fsck on the mdx devices was still neccessary but went through okay so
> things seem to work again... except for that xxx fan :-/
Sounds like you could us
[Jochen Haeberle]
> does not recreate automatically... The problem mentioned striking me
> most is "md0 has overlapping physical units with md2"... this does
> not sound very good to me...
That's informative about resync operations. It is not an error.
> May we run fsck on the md devices???
su
Hi and thanks to all who replied so fast!
Things work fine on the raid arrays after synchronizing finished. A
fsck on the mdx devices was still neccessary but went through okay so
things seem to work again... except for that xxx fan :-/
thanks for the tips and good advice!
cu
Jochen
At 15
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 05:21:15PM -0400, Richard Bollinger wrote:
> The message about overlaping physical units does not indicate failure...
>
> Where there are multiple mirrors on the same physical disks, the Raid code
> avoids recovering more than one at a time for performance reasons. It
> s
The message about overlaping physical units does not indicate failure...
Where there are multiple mirrors on the same physical disks, the Raid code
avoids recovering more than one at a time for performance reasons. It
should recover the first one selected, then sequentially the other mirrors
in
Hi,
after booting the system in safe mode, without touching anything, the
background task kicked in rebuilding the three raid devices. But
there still are problems with the file system... After rebooting, the
message with the overlapping physical units was gone, but the machine
still did not boot
This is off-topic since it's not a RAID problem. But it is occuring on one
of my RAID systems and since this is the most knowledgable group for
scsi/drive questions I hope someone can help, maybe even off-list.
I'm running RAID 1 using on RedHat 6.1. I compiled the aic7xxx driver & RAID
into the
Hi,
about half a year ago I set up a Raid-Server with Mirroring. It run
fine and rebuild nicely when one disk was removed from it's bus.
Today we had a crash of the machine due to heat problems caused
probably by a broken fan :-(
At the moment my colleague at the location is trying to get the
m
Is Lilo incompatible with HPT368 @
RAID0?
-Rolf
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 10:34:01AM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 11:14:29AM +0530, Vasudevan S. wrote:
> > > > The male and female stages of life.
>
> Actually, I found it very funny...
Shame they couldn't spell `handsome' :-)
--
The Sex P
> -Original Message-
> From: Gustavo Aguiar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 10:17 AM
> To: Gregory Leblanc; linux-raid
> Subject: Re: Hardware Raid 5
>
> Hi,
> Does this means that I can't use Hardware Raid 5 on linux
> (redhat 6.2) or this
> means that I can'
Hi,
Does this means that I can't use Hardware Raid 5 on linux (redhat 6.2)
or this
means that I can't use Raid 5 on linux ? (I have a adaptec aaa7869)
Can I
use raid 5 on linux made by software ???
Thank's again,
Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Adaptec does not have any hardware RAID cards (a
Hello All,
I got the Raid-HowTo and I followed it as it says. The howto says that
I can make raid5
via software using mkraid and other tools. I could make the raid but
when I boot even
when I mark the devices as fd my RedHat instalation only recognize
devices as Raid000,
Raid001 and Raid002 wit
It was MOST amusing to receive this from the Linux-SMP list, rather than
one of my usual clever MS users
Scott
--
Scott Ruffner Computer Science Department
Systems Engineer226E Olsson Hall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Virginia
(804)982-2219
Go to the VET, you are a sick puppy! ;-)
I am just MAD and foaming at the mouth!
On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> All right!
>
> Just when I was about to chew out our IT department for nuking
> off all copies of the Life Stages virus before I had a chance to capture
> a
Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 11:14:29AM +0530, Vasudevan S. wrote:
> > > The male and female stages of life.
Actually, I found it very funny...
:-)
Roger.
(Before someone thinks I actually opened the thing: Nope, but
"strings" allows extraction
Martin Bene writes:
> I don't know what a .shs file is suposed to do, but from the contents
> I'd guess this email is something like the iloveyou worm.
Contents of /var/tmp/scanmails25438/unpacked
/var/tmp/scanmails25438/unpacked:
total 43
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 1024 Jun 20 08:22 .
All right!
Just when I was about to chew out our IT department for nuking
off all copies of the Life Stages virus before I had a chance to capture
a specimen... Now some chump (Uh idiot... Uh victim... Yeah, victim,
that's the ticket) steps up to the plate and sends it to several major
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Subject: Life stages
> > The male and female stages of life.
>
>
I don't know what a .shs file is suposed to do, but from the contents
I'd guess this email is something like the iloveyou worm.
Looks like you managed to get your system infected?
Bye, Marti
19 matches
Mail list logo
