On Sat, 15 May 1999, Bill Anderson wrote:
> Chris Price wrote:
> >
> > Robert, why are you running raid on 1 disk???
> >
> > What benefit do you expect to derive from running raid on a single
> > disk?
> >
> > Unless
Robert, why are you running raid on 1 disk???
What benefit do you expect to derive from running raid on a single
disk?
Unless you have a special application, there is **NO** point to
creating a raid array from one disk.
Chris
On Fri, 14 May 1999, Robert (
I don;t know much about other open source backup solutions, but I can
vaouch for amanda. It is a nice tight complete system that does a ton of
administrivia for you...
Chris
Robert Siemer wrote:
>
> Re!
>
> On Thu, 13 May 1999, Francisco Jose Montilla wrote:
> > My que
Micheal;
Any chance of you providing a 'cookbook' on howto do this? Just an
illustration of the commands to execute and what to do in what order?
I think we could all use this, and I for one am planning on doing this
at work in teh near future. While I do not mind learn
Anyone else using this patch successfully? The 19990108 works fine
with a pristine 2.0.36 source, but the 19990128 compile fails. I can
post the errors, but wanted to ask first if there was an obvious known
reason for this patch not to work.
Thanks
Chris
>
> "so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know.
> money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
>
> On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, Chris Price wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, m. allan noah wro
On Sun, 28 Feb 1999, m. allan noah wrote:
> is your system redhat 5.2? if so, do:
>
> rpm -e raidtools
I did this. Raid1 array os working just peachy.
>
> and edit /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit and remove the section on starting raid
> (about 30 lines, do :/raid to find it in vi)
>
> then e
>Having lost a very important disk in the last 7 days, I decided that it
> would be appropriate to configure the new web servers and db server for
> linux.org with dual disks in a RAID-1 setup. Can I get some feedback on the
> following, including any hurdles in configuration, etc.
>
>
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> unavoidable. Still waiting for someone with better documentation skills
> than mine to pick the maintainance of RAID-docs up :)
I would be more than willing to do this, but I admittedly know
very little about linux-raid. I would be more than h
So Micheal, WHERE IS THIS BLOODY INFO DOCUMENTED?? HUH Do we
need to wait until you or some other 'sage' member of this group decides
to bless us with their info, or will you guys start making some half-assed
docs? (hey, I already have in my own small way, see my RAID1 cookbook of
a
> As for notifying redhatI'd suggest sending the raid announcements
> and stuff to someone's attention and they might redirect it to the
> right people etc... ??? ( so it'd be in their hands - what they do
> is a separate issue )
>
> have fun
> alvin
I agree wholeheartedly. A smal
> Is anyone in the "linux-raid community" being paid to do research work
> for redhat? If so, they should probably keep redhat informed. If not, I
> think it's fair to expect redhat to do their own work.
>
> Mike Stone
>
Are you daft, or were you drunk when you wrote this... Saying th
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Geof Goodrum wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Erich J. Ritzmann wrote:
>
> > I have 'blindly' subscribed to this list as I have an immediate need to
> > deploy a RAID1 system. I say blindly as I do not know where to find the
> > main linux-raid web site or FAQ.
>
> Try ht
out RAID (and more specifically, Linux
RAID
says that a system with a raid array *OF ANY KIND* should be UPS protected
with some sort of UPS montoring software enabled. No sense in going to the
effort of building a raid array only to lose all/some of your data to a
power failure.
Of course, YMMV
Chris Price
Sysadmin
Western Computer Link
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
OK, in addition to my last post, upon rebooting my system (which
had a raid1 device functioning flawlessly thru 2 hours of testing), I get
teh following messages at boot:
Starting up RAID devices.
raidadd(pid 37) used obsolete MD ioctl, upgrade your software to use new
ictls.
r
OK, so having thought I had everything working, mke2fs -c /dev/md0
on the setup I have (see last message) returns:
mke2fs 1.12, 9-Jul-98 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09
/dev/md0: Invalid argument passed to ext2 library while setting up superblock
Agggh...
Hi;
After playing with RAID setups unsuccessfully for quite a while, I
think I finally have a raid1 setup working. What I would like to ask is
if the participants of this list could 'peer-review' my setup before I
make it (the raid system) a production system for my organization.
17 matches
Mail list logo
