Hi,
2 disks with RH 5.2, kernel 2.2.14 + RAID-patch: root and swap are
regular partitions, while /tmp, /var and /usr are mirrored. Yesterday
I installed a new bootdisk (the other one had medium errors in the
root-partition) and of course the new disk has a different
geometry. Anyway, I managed to
Martin Bene writes:
> I don't know what a .shs file is suposed to do, but from the contents
> I'd guess this email is something like the iloveyou worm.
Contents of /var/tmp/scanmails25438/unpacked
/var/tmp/scanmails25438/unpacked:
total 43
drwxr-xr-x2 root root 1024 Jun 20 08:22 .
Christoph Terhechte writes:
> I just bought Red Hat 6.2 to set up an intranet database server. One
> of the reasons for my choice was their claim for improved RAID
> management. Browsing trough this list, however, I keep reading about
> RAID patches that should be applied to the kernel sources bef
Hi,
on a server one disk had a "medium error" and the RAID1 (2.2.14-B1)
disabled one of the mirrors. It looks like this:
md0 : active raid1 sdb5[1] sda5[0](F) 4739072 blocks [2/1] [_U]
If I reboot now, how will the system react? Will it recognize the
failed partition or (worst case) will it try
Hi,
last Friday I updated the buggy machine to 2.2.14 (B1) - until then
the problem with the "attempt to access beyond end of device" causing
"only one disk left and IO error." happened three times. On one
occasion the backup (tar) croaked about one file "shrunk by" about 6MB
(the file had 7MB)
Tim Niemueller writes:
> I will get a new computer in some days and I want to build up an array.
> I will use a derivate of RedHat Linux 6.1 (Halloween 4). There is RAID
> support in the graphical installation tool, so I think the RAID patches
> are already attached to the kernel.
Yes, just like
James Manning writes:
> What worries me is that what looks like is happening is that the
> md-layer is passing a very-invalid sector request (for whatever reason
> it got that far) down to the devices making up your raid1 and since the
> ll_rw_blk::make_request() fails the md-layer tags that as a
Hi,
I recently upgraded one machine from the original RedHat 5.2/kernel
2.0.36 RAID-stuff (using RAID1) to kernel 2.2.13ac3 with
raidtools-19990824-0.90.tar.gz. The partition table on both disks
looks like this:
Device BootStart End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 1
Mike Frisch writes:
> > - duplicating a partition layout is much easier :)
>
> Does this mean it's possible to build a RAID1 configuration from a single
> disk without having to reformat?
What I meant was, that I can read the partition table with
"disklabel", modify it a bit and write it on
Mike Frisch writes:
> Looks pretty interesting, but I am not a FBSD user, so I have no idea
> how functional, robust, etc. it is. All I can say is that Linux
> software RAID needs some decent documentation like this.
In the past I was setting up 4 servers using Linux-RAID1:
- 2 with the ol
10 matches
Mail list logo
