At 07:18 PM 3/11/00 +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote:
>I found a discussion after all:
>
>http://ostenfeld.dk/~jakob/Software-RAID.HOWTO/Software-RAID.HOWTO-2.html#ss2.4
>
>Jakob says it's OK to swap on RAID.
It *is* okay to swap on raid. It is *not* okay to swap on raid during the
resyncing process.
Dunno what all the fuzz is about... But i'm running 2 raid1 arrays. One
16mb /dev/md0
for boot, and one 15gb /dev/md1 as root. If u go into rh6.1's graphic
install u can choose
if u want an ext2 or a raid device. Go ahead and try it out. Worked
perfectly here, just
2day i janked out the primary
At 10:43 29-2-00 +0100, Thomas Rottler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:40:11PM -0600, George Liu wrote:
> > This is a simple question but is difficult for me. I want to install a
> > bootable-RAID 1 for 2 SCSI hard drive in the same controller. The kernel
> > is 2.2.12 accompanying OS Redhat 6.
Hey all,
I'm running a new box with redhat6.1 and 2 5400rpm 15 gig harddisks.
There's also a cd-rom drive
on the same controller. Both the hd's are running as masters as a Raid-1
array, and cd cd-rom as
primary slave. While trying to get my isdn to work (i managed that now btw)
i managed to ge
At 14:31 19-1-00 +0200, Janne Himanka wrote:
>We have a dual PII with 8 4.3GB Cheetahs in two uw scsi channels. I
>used to run it with kernel 2.2.3, a root disk, spare disk and a raid5
>partition composed of 6 disks. The raid5 partition worked otherwise
>well, but within 6 months it lost its super
Seems like our problems might all b over soon,
check this url out http://lwn.net/daily/2.3-fixlist.html
looks like they're gonna get raid 0.90 into the kernel, and then use it for
2.4 :)
Surge
At 01:35 4-1-00 +0100, you wrote:
>>Assuming this is yet again the cause of problems, is anyone el
>
>Assuming this is yet again the cause of problems, is anyone else getting
>sick of
>stupid distros like Suse and Mandrake that include raidtools-0.90 without
>including support in the kernel?
I keep replying to these emails, all the users are thankful, but yeah, i
think we're all getting
kin
What kind of raid level do you have? I *think* only raid lineair and raid 0 are
supported for now, but i might be wrong.
Surge
At 06:00 29-12-99 +, Glenn McGrath wrote:
>Im trying to resize (shrink) my raid partition, ive ran ext2resize and
>shrank it from 35GB to 15GB, now im not sure how t
U can apply to a 2.2.13 kernel as well, no need to go with a 2.2.11 kernel.
It will
give u 2 rejects, but it's safe to ignore those. I'm using the same
patches/tools with
the 2.2.13 kernel as well.
Surge
At 09:33 21-12-99 -0200, Alexandre Hautequest wrote:
>"Schackel, Fa. Integrata, ZRZ DA" wr
> > As a comment: the docs should
> > probably emphasize the importance of shutting down the RAID by hand if
> > your system doesn't do it automatically, and RH 6.0 doesn't.
>
>Using new-style RAID, the kernel handles stopping the RAID at shutdown. You
>should not be stopping the RAID yourself b
>In the context of booting from RAID, the disk geometry is only needed if the
>boot-loader is trying to read from or write to a file on a RAID-1 array that
>contains that partition. But in that case, the disk= and partition= lines
>would
>point to RAID arrays, not normal disks and partitions (se
At 09:07 26/10/99 -0600, Marcos Lopez wrote:
>Egon Eckert wrote:
> >
> > > syslogd 378 root5w REG9,18548 192396
> > > /var/log/boot.log
> > > klogd 389 root2r REG8,1 191102 12
> > > /boot/System.map-2.2.12-20
> > >
> > > Is it safe to kill these?
Loose my head next time... really...
offcourse i meant with raid0
At 13:51 24/10/99 +0200, Kelina wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>i just had a crash with software raid 1, the power of 1 of the 2 raid hd's
>came loose during bootup. It resulted in me having to reboot. Then it checked
>t
Hi all,
i just had a crash with software raid 1, the power of 1 of the 2 raid hd's
came loose during bootup. It resulted in me having to reboot. Then it checked
the hd, found that an inode was not connected. Had to drop into a shell and
run fcsk. Which put a single inode in the lost+found dir.
I tried it and i'm compiling now, there's 1 extra hunk fail i think, just
entered it thru. For people
using the ide patch, u'll need the new 2.2.13pre ide patch, cuz the old
2.2.12 ide patch failed
on some points (IMHO)
If anything goes wrong i'll keep u posted
Surge
At 09:22 20/10/99 -0500,
Enable what in the kernel? I did compile it with raid linear and raid0 support
also with boot raid support, i checked that.
At 19:38 23/09/99 +0200, you wrote:
>Kelina wrote:
>
> > To answer ur 2nd question. No i haven't made a separate partition since
> > accordin
Let me explain... i haven't actually ran raid yet, i want it to run raid0,
but it's
not working yet. And i'm trying to get it to work from my current setup. Which
is just 2 ide hd's of which 1 has data and the 2nd was recently added... Both
are formatted with diskdruid and have linux native parti
Tromp
>
>On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Kelina wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to run a raid0 setup as boot device with ide 2 disks on my
> linux
> > 2.2.12 kernel patched with the latest raidpatch and ide patch and
> > compiled with raid linear and raid 0 support.
> >
>
At 14:30 23/09/99 +0200, Kay Salzwedel wrote:
>Hi folks,
>
>thanks for the replays to my earlier problem. Now I got kernel 2.2.11
>and the patch raid0145-19990824-2.2.11. It went well until I tried to
>compile the latest raidtools (raidtools-0.41). During the configure it
>say's that I have no Ra
I'm trying to run a raid0 setup as boot device with ide 2 disks on my linux
2.2.12 kernel patched with the latest raidpatch and ide patch and
compiled with raid linear and raid 0 support.
What i get when booting is the following:
Warning: unable to open an initial console
Kernel Panic: No init
I just did the very same thing
Kernel: 2.2.12
Patch: raid0145-19990824-2.2.11
added Raid0 and Linear support, Raid5 as module
*BUT* i also used an ide patch ide.2.2.12.patch.gz which i can get from the
people's dir
under hedrick from any ftp.xx.kernel.org ftp.
I patched the kernel with raidpat
21 matches
Mail list logo
