On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
> that version of the RAID code does not yet do a proper reconstruction. Use
> the 0.90 version of raidtools to 'mkraid --upgrade /dev/md0' your array,
> then use the 0.90 driver and do a:
Is raidtools-0.90 available in RPM (pref src.rpm) format anywhere?
On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, Stephen Costaras wrote:
> Can someone e-mail me (or give me an alternate ftp site for)
> raidtools v0.90 & the latest 2.0.35 patch.
search for raidtools-19981005-B-0.90.tar.gz on any FTP search system (eg.
http://ftpsearch.ntnu.no), it turns up lots of alternate sites.
OTECTED]>
To: Stephen Costaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, October 25, 1998 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: Can't rebuild RAID5?
>
>On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, Stephen Costaras wrote:
>
>> I have a RAID5 array comprised of 8 scsi di
On Sat, 24 Oct 1998, Stephen Costaras wrote:
> I have a RAID5 array comprised of 8 scsi disks (/dev/sd[b-i]1)
> with /dev/sdb1 being the first disk of the array. I'm using
> raidtools-0.51 under kernel 2.0.35.
>
> The first disk /dev/sdb1 failed. the raid continues as normal
> like it should
I have a RAID5 array comprised of 8 scsi disks (/dev/sd[b-i]1)
with /dev/sdb1 being the first disk of the array. I'm using
raidtools-0.51 under kernel 2.0.35.
The first disk /dev/sdb1 failed. the raid continues as normal
like it should. Now when I try to replace the disk with another
fresh 4g
