Re: Low performance on K6

1999-03-31 Thread Paul Jakma
i get about 22-24MB/s across 3 IBM UW drives according to bonnie. (reading and writing), and over 200 seeks/sec. 64MB ram. 1x 9.1GB IBM DGHS09U uw 2x 4.3GB DDRS uw Buslogic BT-958. K6 233MHz. TMC TI5VG+ board (via mvp3, 1MB cache). regards, Paul Jakma. On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Low performance on K6

1999-03-31 Thread Michael Tibor
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone have a clue about what could be going on ?? The main > difference between my own box which ran a similar configuration for long > time seems to be that this box is a K6.Anyone running raid0 on similar > configurations with a K6

Re: Low performance on K6

1999-03-31 Thread Robert Siemer
Re! On Wed, 31 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hardware: > 2 x IBM UltraStar 9ES 4.5 GB U2W > Adaptec 2940 UW > AMD K6 - 200 MHz > 64 MB RAM > > Each disk gives us around 11 MB/s using hdparm -t /dev/sd[ab] > > If we run hdparm -t /dev/sda & hdparm -t /dev/sdb, (two hdparm's

Low performance on K6

1999-03-31 Thread jakob
Hi all ! I promised to show off RAID on a friend's box. Ok, so we set up 2.2.3 with corrosponding patches on his box with the following hardware: 2 x IBM UltraStar 9ES 4.5 GB U2W Adaptec 2940 UW AMD K6 - 200 MHz 64 MB RAM Each disk gives us around 11 MB/s using hdparm -t /dev/sd[a