Re: raid5 on 2.2.14

2000-03-18 Thread Seth Vidal
If the partition types are set to "fd" and you selected the "autorun" config option in block devices (it should be turned on on a rawhide-type kernel), raidstart shouldn't be necessary. (the kernel will have already started the md arrays itself, and the later initscripts raidstart call

raid5 on 2.2.14

2000-03-17 Thread Seth Vidal
Hi folks, got a small problem. I'm running redhat 6.1+ (2.2.14-5.0 kernels from rawhide and new raidtools 0.90-6) I've checked and the 2.2.14-5.0 are using the B1 patch from mingo's page. I think the raidtools they are using (mentioned above) are the correct version. Here is what happens: I

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-25 Thread David Cooley
I took the patch I grabbed at work on a SUN box and loaded it... it was 60K smaller than the one I was loading last night. Patched a fresh 2.2.14 kernel with no problems and the raid is up and running! Thanks for everyone's help, and Damn you, Bill Gates for your Kludged 8 bit GUI OS! At

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread Gary Allpike
David, I think you may have a kernel that has had other patches applied to it. 2.2.14 and the associated patch worked fine for me, the patch applied with no rejects. regards Gary Allpike [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linux.org.au On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, David Cooley wrote: Anyone

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread David Cooley
Where'd you get your source? I downloaded mine from ftp.kernel.org and it's 2.2.14-1.3.0 At 11:08 AM 1/24/00 +0800, Gary Allpike wrote: David, I think you may have a kernel that has had other patches applied to it. 2.2.14 and the associated patch worked fine for me, the patch applied with no

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread David Cooley
Here's what I get when patching against a fresh 2.2.13-1.3.0 kernel source Where'd you get your source? I downloaded mine from ftp.kernel.org and it's 2.2.14-1.3.0 At 11:08 AM 1/24/00 +0800, Gary Allpike wrote: [root@bigdaddy src]# patch -p0 -i raid-2.2.14 patching file

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread Michael Robinton
Anyone successfully gotten raid 5 working with the new 2.2.14 kernel? I downloaded the 2.2.14 kernel source tree and installed it, then downloaded Mingo's 2.2.14 raid patch. The patch appeared to work fine on the first few hunks, then failed miserably on the last 100 or so Yes, I

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread David Cooley
At 08:06 PM 1/23/00 -0800, Michael Robinton wrote: Anyone successfully gotten raid 5 working with the new 2.2.14 kernel? I downloaded the 2.2.14 kernel source tree and installed it, then downloaded Mingo's 2.2.14 raid patch. The patch appeared to work fine on the first few hunks, then

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread James Manning
[ Sunday, January 23, 2000 ] David Cooley wrote: Since I put his patch in /usr/src I used patch -p0 raid-2.2.14-b1 This is the 3rd reported problem with the 2.2.14 patch and the first two were both bad downloads (both netscape I believe, strangely enough). Perhaps try using something like

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread Danilo Godec
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000, David Cooley wrote: Here's what I get when patching against a fresh 2.2.13-1.3.0 kernel source Where'd you get your source? I downloaded mine from ftp.kernel.org and it's 2.2.14-1.3.0 What is this '-1.3.0'? I don't think this is plain kernel source... If I go to

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread David Cooley
I just re-downloaded the Kernel source and patch while at work on a SUN box running Solaris 2.6... I'll get this too, but will play with the patching first to see if it was windows trashing the patch on the download. Thanks! Dave At 10:23 PM 1/24/2000 +0800, Gary Allpike wrote: I have put

Re: RAID5 and 2.2.14

2000-01-24 Thread David Cooley
Oops... I meant fresh 2.2.14 kernel.org source. At 10:33 PM 1/23/2000 -0500, David Cooley wrote: Here's what I get when patching against a fresh 2.2.13-1.3.0 kernel source Where'd you get your source? I downloaded mine from ftp.kernel.org and it's 2.2.14-1.3.0 At 11:08 AM 1/24/00 +0800,