[Michael T. Babcock]
> And where can I find err # 22 ... or is it not defined yet?
defined in as EINVAL
James
"Michael T. Babcock" wrote:
>
> I'm running Kernel 2.2.14 with the ReiserFS and crypto patches.
> I'm trying to use raidtools-0.90 to build a raid5 set.
>
Read the ReiserFS README. It does not work with RAID 5.
Erik.
what kernel and patch are you using, and is this redhat 5.2?
allan
"so don't tell us it can't be done, putting down what you don't know.
money isn't our god, integrity will free our souls" - Max Cavalera
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Bruno Derrien wrote:
>
> I'm using raidtools 0.90 .
>
> My RAID-1 d
Hi,
set MD partitions type to 83 (linux native) and reboot your system.
Now try mkraid. Seems that MD autodetection disable mkraid proper actions.
For autodetection change type to 0xfd.
Best wishes,
> [root@tekelili]# mkraid /dev/md0
> handling MD device /dev/md0
> analyzing super-block
> disk
I had this same problem a week ago. You still need to apply the appropriate
patches to the kernel to get things to work properly. The latest one from
ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/alpha/raid0145-19990108-2.2.0-pre5.gz
should apply. I haven't tried patching 2.2.0pre8 myself, but It patc
> [root@tekelili]# mkraid /dev/md0
> handling MD device /dev/md0
> analyzing super-block
> disk 0: /dev/sdb1, 1028128kB, raid superblock at 1028032kB
> disk 1: /dev/sdc1, 1028128kB, raid superblock at 1028032kB
> disk 2: /dev/sdd1, 1028128kB, raid superblock at 1028032kB
> disk 3: /dev/sde1, 10281
Letting the chips fall where they may, I quote Randy Johnson:
>RAIDTAB
>
># raiddev configuration file
>
>raiddev /dev/md0
>raid-level0
>nr-raid-disks 4
>nr-spare-disks0
>chunk-size8
>
>device/dev/sda1
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 10:13 PM
To: Roberto Rivera
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Harris
Subject: RE: Raidtools-0.90
Hi,
I was just talking to Chance Reschke through e-mail about "mkraid" with
the
raid-0 personality. He states that you do have to use the "mk
mkraid with raid-0" mis-conception is a symptom of the old
documentation. That was true with the older version. However, the 0.90
version requires a superblock on the raid-0 array.
- David Harris
Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well I am trying to create a striped(raid 0) raid drive. I read in the
document and man page that mkraid can't be used for striped drives. Is
there some other step required? Thanks for such a quick reply.
Robert
Hi,
Did you run "mkraid" to setup the superblocks before you ran "raidstart"?
- David Harris
Principal Engineer, DRH Internet Services
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roberto Rivera
Sent: Friday, December 18, 1998 10:19 PM
To:
[...]
> The short-end of it is that you must apply the kernel patches
> that are a companion to the raidtools-0.90 -- stock kernel
> is not compatible with those tools.
Ok, thanks for the help. The raid0145-19981110-2.0.35.gz doesn't apply to
2.0.36. I'd be happy to test anything that might be
Dave Wreski wrote:
>
...# ./mkraid --configfile /etc/raidtab /dev/md0
> handling MD device /dev/md0
> analyzing super-block
> disk 0: /dev/hdc1, 425218kB, raid superblock at 425152kB
> disk 1: /dev/hdd1, 425218kB, raid superblock at 425152kB
> mkraid: aborted
I traced that "aborted" down to a fa
On Wed, 4 Nov 1998, Mike Tvarkunas wrote:
> I keep seeing mentions of Raidtools0.90, but all I seem to be able to find
> is 0.50? Where is 0.90 being hid at? Can someone send me that addy,
> please! :)
It's in the 'alpha' code directory. The URL is
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/daemons/raid/
14 matches
Mail list logo
