Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-18 Thread James Manning
> > Side question... I noticed that the KNI stuff was stripped going into > > 2.2.11-ac3 (rightly so), so is 2.2.12 going to be a target to get all > > the KNI stuff working? or perhaps somewhere in .12-acX? > > Probably 2.3 So the current s/w raid stuff will end up migrating into 2.3.x as well?

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-18 Thread Alan Cox
> Side question... I noticed that the KNI stuff was stripped going into > 2.2.11-ac3 (rightly so), so is 2.2.12 going to be a target to get all > the KNI stuff working? or perhaps somewhere in .12-acX? Probably 2.3 Alan

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-18 Thread James Manning
> I think so too. We have in the past been prepared to do this sort of > stuff. 2.2.11 did it with ISDN and I heard few moans, 2.2 at some point > needs to do this with the knfsd update. Side question... I noticed that the KNI stuff was stripped going into 2.2.11-ac3 (rightly so), so is 2.2.12 g

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-17 Thread Alan Cox
> I'm sure most people on this list are *very* interested in seeing the > new RAID stuff go into the stock kernel, especially considering the > fact that the current in-kernel RAID code is simply broken in many > cases, and doesn't provide essential features such as background > reconstruction. I

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-17 Thread jakob
On Tue, Aug 17, 1999 at 09:18:03AM -0400, Fred Reimer wrote: > > He sent me a reply email in which he indicated he would pull the 0.90 > patches from 2.2.12pre before the 2.2.12 final if they continue to > cause confusion. Seems that there is not enough documentation clearly > stating what needs

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-17 Thread Fred Reimer
He sent me a reply email in which he indicated he would pull the 0.90 patches from 2.2.12pre before the 2.2.12 final if they continue to cause confusion. Seems that there is not enough documentation clearly stating what needs to be done if someone is using stock kernel before 2.2.12pre with raid

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-16 Thread C. R. Oldham
"Stanley, Jeremy" wrote: > Supposedly support will be integrated into 2.2.12, no patch required. > No mention of a patch for 2.2.11 yet... Someone correct me if I'm > wrong. Actually, maybe I didn't send this to the list just to a previous poster, but I discovered that Alan Cox has integrated

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-15 Thread C. R. Oldham
James Manning wrote: > > where can i find this patch? it supports raid autodetection? > > ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/alan/2.2/patch-2.2.11-ac3.gz And actually this patch has been superceded by 2.2.12-pre3, which is at ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/alan/2.2.12pre/patc

RE: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-15 Thread Stanley, Jeremy
Supposedly support will be integrated into 2.2.12, no patch required. No mention of a patch for 2.2.11 yet... Someone correct me if I'm wrong. -- Jeremy Stanley Trend CMHS Network Engineer http://www.trendcmhs.org The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily repre

Re: Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-13 Thread thomasko321
> where can i find this patch? it supports raid autodetection? alan's kernel patches are on every kernel-mirror in the directory: /pub/linux/kernel/alan thomas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > you can use the 2.2.11-ac3 patch > > > > it includes the 0.90 raid driver > > > > On Thu, 12 Aug

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-13 Thread James Manning
> where can i find this patch? it supports raid autodetection? ftp://ftp.us.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/alan/2.2/patch-2.2.11-ac3.gz and Yes James -- Miscellaneous Engineer --- IBM Netfinity Performance Development

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-13 Thread Andreas Gietl
where can i find this patch? it supports raid autodetection? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > you can use the 2.2.11-ac3 patch > > it includes the 0.90 raid driver > > On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > To make the patching a little bit clearer. raid0145-0.90-2.2.10.bz2 is only >

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-13 Thread thomasko321
To make the patching a little bit clearer. raid0145-0.90-2.2.10.bz2 is only for the kernel 2.2.10, not for a kernel with ac, not for 2.2.11 or whatever, it's for 2.2.10 standard. There could have been minor changes, and the whole patch doesn't apply anymore. Then you have to do it by hand. The ne

Re: Status of RAID in 2.2.11

1999-08-13 Thread raid
you can use the 2.2.11-ac3 patch it includes the 0.90 raid driver On Thu, 12 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > To make the patching a little bit clearer. raid0145-0.90-2.2.10.bz2 is only > for the kernel 2.2.10, not for a kernel with ac, not for 2.2.11 or > whatever, it's for 2.2.10 standar