At 09:36 03.03.00, Thomas Rottler wrote:
>I was told several times now to use LILO with the Redhat patches.
>But my favorite distribution was/is/will be Debian, and I didn't find these
>patches anywhere on the net..
You can get the patch from ftp://ftp.sime.com/pub/linux/lilo.raid1.gz
Bye, Marti
Hi!
I was told several times now to use LILO with the Redhat patches.
But my favorite distribution was/is/will be Debian, and I didn't find these
patches anywhere on the net..
So please post them to the list or directly to me (if they're too large)..
THX!
Thomas
The solution is so simple after I got the RH 6.1 CDROM with new graphical
installer. I did finish it in so easy way. Thank you for your helps.
George
Kelina wrote:
> Dunno what all the fuzz is about... But i'm running 2 raid1 arrays. One
> 16mb /dev/md0
> for boot, and one 15gb /dev/md1 as roo
Dunno what all the fuzz is about... But i'm running 2 raid1 arrays. One
16mb /dev/md0
for boot, and one 15gb /dev/md1 as root. If u go into rh6.1's graphic
install u can choose
if u want an ext2 or a raid device. Go ahead and try it out. Worked
perfectly here, just
2day i janked out the primary
Hi!
I've another idea to run a RAID 1 '/' partition:
(I assume that CONFIG_AUTODETECT_RAID is available.)
Recently I found out that you can access the individual real devices of a RAID
array (if it's not active). This way I could tell the kernel to mount my RAID
1 device as rootdir ("root=/dev/m
At 19:14 29.02.00, Gregory Leblanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you're running some
>other distro, you need to be running RAID 0.90, and LILO with the redhat
>patches.
Just a small warning about the lilo - rai1 patches:
1) The patch does NOT handle arrays in degraded mode correctly (check f
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Rottler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 2:44 PM
> To: Linux RAID
> Subject: Re: ask help RAID1, 2 SCSI Drive, RedHat6.1
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:14:35AM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
>
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 10:14:35AM -0800, Gregory Leblanc wrote:
> I think you've got them mixed up. It makes the most sense to be able to
> boot from a RAID1 (mirror), next most to be able to boot from LINEAR, and
> the least ammount of sense to be able to boot from a RAID0 or RAID5, because
> o
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Rottler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 29, 2000 1:43 AM
> To: Linux RAID
> Subject: Re: ask help RAID1, 2 SCSI Drive, RedHat6.1
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:40:11PM -0600, George Liu wrote:
> >
At 10:43 29-2-00 +0100, Thomas Rottler wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:40:11PM -0600, George Liu wrote:
> > This is a simple question but is difficult for me. I want to install a
> > bootable-RAID 1 for 2 SCSI hard drive in the same controller. The kernel
> > is 2.2.12 accompanying OS Redhat 6.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:40:11PM -0600, George Liu wrote:
> This is a simple question but is difficult for me. I want to install a
> bootable-RAID 1 for 2 SCSI hard drive in the same controller. The kernel
> is 2.2.12 accompanying OS Redhat 6.1.
I don't know about a possibility to boot from a R
11 matches
Mail list logo
