Hi,
> You are probably not using the "CONFIG_AUTODETECT_RAID" feature
> whereby you mark the raid partitions with a special parition type
> (0xfd) and then the raid arrays are automagically configured at boot
> time.
The raid1 module was missing in the booting kernel so the autodetection
failed.
On Tuesday May 23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some recovery problems with RAID1.
> (raidtools 0.90)
> I use Red Hat Linux 6.1 and I have two partitions mirrored (hda8 and hdc8).
> If I loose the second part of the mirror I don't have any problems.
>
Hi
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Piete Brooks wrote:
> > When running LILO only /dev/hdb is updated.
>
> How come ?
Wish I knew It all happened after I was testing to see what would
happen under various failure conditions. I had three identical drives that
I was experimenting with by removing and r
John Saunders [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 11:54 AM
> To: Thomas Scheuermann
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Recovery problems with raid1
>
> Hi
>
> I have a similar problem.
>
> /dev/md1 consists of /dev/hda5 and /dev/hdb5
Hi,
Am Die, 23 Mai 2000 schrieben Sie:
> Hi
>
> I have a similar problem.
>
> /dev/md1 consists of /dev/hda5 and /dev/hdb5
>
> When running LILO only /dev/hdb is updated.
>
> Should /dev/hdb fail, I cannot boot from /dev/hda and get a message that
> no valid boot disk was found.
>
> I hav
add'd the
drive.
After array resonstruction I ran LILO again with the same result.
Anyone have any ideas ?.
Regards
John
On Tue, 23 May 2000, Thomas Scheuermann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have some recovery problems with RAID1.
> (raidtools 0.90)
> I use Red Hat Linux 6.1
Hello,
I have some recovery problems with RAID1.
(raidtools 0.90)
I use Red Hat Linux 6.1 and I have two partitions mirrored (hda8 and hdc8).
If I loose the second part of the mirror I don't have any problems.
I can recreate the RAID1 with raidhotadd /dev/md0 /dev/hdc8.
But if I loose the
