On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Simo Varis wrote:
On the other hand SA-221 is worth of Compaq SCSI 18GB hotswap drive so
if there is no real advantages having HW-RAID money may become important
factor.
If someone has benchmarks for SA-221 I really would like to see them.
Thank you!
I have to setup Linux on Compaq Proliant server soon. What is needed is
about 18 GB disk space, i.e. RAID1 = 2x 18GB or RAID5 = 3x 9GB.
Proliant 400 is enough, but it cannot do hotswap which Proliant 1600
can do.
Now, if I go for a bit more expensive PL1600, how well hotswap features
work with
-Original Message-
From: Simo Varis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 3:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SW-RAID or Compaq HW-RAID?
I have to setup Linux on Compaq Proliant server soon. What is
needed is
about 18 GB disk space, i.e. RAID1 = 2x
[ Friday, February 25, 2000 ] Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Then, how much slower (not faster I guess :) Smart Array 221 would be
than SW-RAID (single P3-500)? And can I do all SA-221 maintaining from
Linux or do I need to reboot to dos? New official home
[ Friday, February 25, 2000 ] Gregory Leblanc wrote:
where's tiobench?
It's the perl script front-end part of tiotest
http://www.icon.fi/~mak/tiotest/
(There's also some front-end redirector that I can't find right now)
James
-Original Message-
From: James Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 1:24 PM
To: Gregory Leblanc
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SW-RAID or Compaq HW-RAID?
[ Friday, February 25, 2000 ] Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Then, how much slower (not faster
-Original Message-
From: James Manning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2000 1:53 PM
To: Gregory Leblanc
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SW-RAID or Compaq HW-RAID?
[ Friday, February 25, 2000 ] Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Does anybody have a nice script
[ Friday, February 25, 2000 ] Gregory Leblanc wrote:
Does anybody have a nice script to run tiobench through it's paces, and
collect results? I'm going to try that SPARC patch tonight, and run RAID5
through it's paces. I suppose I'll need to find a nice way to keep the
processors busy,
