marco mille wrote,
hi all,
wich type of partition can I do, for to do a raid1 software with
raidtools ?
because when I do cmd "mkraid /dev/md0" I receive a error "maik raid:
aborted"
can somebody help me ?? please!
tanks
marco
extra step of having to partition
> the drive
No big deal ...
> (and in the worst case reboot to make the system see that you've
> partitioned),
No -- the bit about looking at the partition type is *ONLY* at reboot time.
To hot fix, you just tell it, and it doesn't look at the part
Hi,
> The only place I would even imagine this would be possible would be in
> the mode pages, but my recollection of the SCSI standard says that all
> of these modes pages are read only. :(
IIRC there are some writable fields in some drives to allow you to set
caching/writeback behaviour, for e
> That's not the point: we don't even _look_ for a raid superblock unless
> the partition is marked for autostart.
Yup -- a *REAL* bummer if the partition doesn't have a partition type.
> There are related problems we need to deal with regularly when building
> files
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Mar 1999 15:27:26 -0500 (EST), Laszlo Vecsey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Isnt there room in the raid header for an additional flag to mark the
> 'partition' type? I realize this might require a 'mkraid --upgrade' to be
> run, but at least the
Laszlo Vecsey wrote:
> In the original docs or howtos, mention is made of being able to partition
> your /dev/sdx device first, or just using it as a raw device.. which is
> what I've done. Now that detection based on the partition type is
> available though, its a little unfo
In the original docs or howtos, mention is made of being able to partition
your /dev/sdx device first, or just using it as a raw device.. which is
what I've done. Now that detection based on the partition type is
available though, its a little unfortunate for those of us with raw
devices.
Hello Craig , Try 'fd' not '0xfd' . Hth
On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Craig W. Hansen wrote:
>
> > > this is my goof, it's not fe but "0xfd".
>
> > I tried this and the partition disappeared in fdisk. Any ideas? I'm
> > using fdisk v2.1.
>
> [root
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Craig W. Hansen wrote:
> > this is my goof, it's not fe but "0xfd".
> I tried this and the partition disappeared in fdisk. Any ideas? I'm
> using fdisk v2.1.
[root@hell /root]# fdisk -v
fdisk v2.1 (>4GB)
[root@hell /root]# fdisk /dev/sdc
Command (m for help): p
Disk /d
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Gary Allpike wrote:
>
> > However they dont seem to auto-start.
> >
> > I have set the partitions on the drives to type "fe"
>
> this is my goof, it's not fe but "0xfd".
>
> -- mingo
I tried this and the partition disappeared in
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Gary Allpike wrote:
>
> > However they dont seem to auto-start.
> >
> > I have set the partitions on the drives to type "fe"
>
> this is my goof, it's not fe but "0xfd".
>
> -- mingo
>
Thanks to all that replied - I'll test
On Fri, 23 Oct 1998, Gary Allpike wrote:
> However they dont seem to auto-start.
>
> I have set the partitions on the drives to type "fe"
this is my goof, it's not fe but "0xfd".
-- mingo
12 matches
Mail list logo
