[PATCH opensm] Handle memory allocation failure in osm_db_domain_init()

2013-09-12 Thread Line Holen
Signed-off-by: Line Holen --- diff --git a/opensm/osm_db_files.c b/opensm/osm_db_files.c index 513cf85..9219722 100644 --- a/opensm/osm_db_files.c +++ b/opensm/osm_db_files.c @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ * Copyright (c) 2004-2009 Voltaire, Inc. All rights reserved. * Copyright (c) 2002-2007 Mellanox Tech

Re: [ceph-users] Help needed porting Ceph to RSockets

2013-09-12 Thread Gandalf Corvotempesta
2013/9/10 Andreas Bluemle : > Since I have added these workarounds to my version of the librdmacm > library, I can at least start up ceph using LD_PRELOAD and end up in > a healthy ceph cluster state. Have you seen any performance improvement by using LD_PRELOAD with ceph? Which throughput are you

Re: [PATCH V4 9/9] IB/mlx4: Enable mlx4_ib support for MODIFY_QP_EX

2013-09-12 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 12/09/2013 08:26, Devesh Sharma wrote: I don't see any patches to librdmacm/libibverbs git to call _EX version of uverbs commands. We've posted the kernel patches, that should be enough for the review. If you have any specific questions re user space aspects of this series, feel free to s

Re: [PATCH V4 9/9] IB/mlx4: Enable mlx4_ib support for MODIFY_QP_EX

2013-09-12 Thread Devesh Sharma
Inline Below: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 12/09/2013 08:26, Devesh Sharma wrote: >> >> I don't see any patches to librdmacm/libibverbs git to call _EX version of >> uverbs commands. > > > We've posted the kernel patches, that should be enough for the review. If > you h

Re: [PATCH V4 9/9] IB/mlx4: Enable mlx4_ib support for MODIFY_QP_EX

2013-09-12 Thread Devesh Sharma
Inline Below on Second question: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > On 12/09/2013 08:26, Devesh Sharma wrote: >> >> I don't see any patches to librdmacm/libibverbs git to call _EX version of >> uverbs commands. > > > We've posted the kernel patches, that should be enough for the

Re: [ceph-users] Help needed porting Ceph to RSockets

2013-09-12 Thread Andreas Bluemle
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:20:03 +0200 Gandalf Corvotempesta wrote: > 2013/9/10 Andreas Bluemle : > > Since I have added these workarounds to my version of the librdmacm > > library, I can at least start up ceph using LD_PRELOAD and end up in > > a healthy ceph cluster state. > > Have you seen any p

Re: [PATCH V4 9/9] IB/mlx4: Enable mlx4_ib support for MODIFY_QP_EX

2013-09-12 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 12/09/2013 14:31, Devesh Sharma wrote: On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: We've posted the kernel patches, that should be enough for the review. If you have any specific questions re user space aspects of this series, feel free to send them now. Yes! for kenel space I see

[PATCH librdmacm] examples: Remove unneeded include of header file when using rocket.h

2013-09-12 Thread Hal Rosenstock
as it's included in rsocket.h Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock --- diff --git a/examples/riostream.c b/examples/riostream.c index a1d3671..6587707 100644 --- a/examples/riostream.c +++ b/examples/riostream.c @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ #include #include -#include #include #include "common.h" diff

[PATCH opensm] osm_db_files.c: Add osm_db_domain_init failure handling into test program

2013-09-12 Thread Hal Rosenstock
Also, improve error 6100 log message Signed-off-by: Hal Rosenstock --- diff --git a/opensm/osm_db_files.c b/opensm/osm_db_files.c index 9219722..10389da 100644 --- a/opensm/osm_db_files.c +++ b/opensm/osm_db_files.c @@ -162,7 +162,8 @@ int osm_db_init(IN osm_db_t * p_db, IN osm_log_t * p_log)

Re: [PATCH opensm] Handle memory allocation failure in osm_db_domain_init()

2013-09-12 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On 9/12/2013 4:14 AM, Line Holen wrote: > Signed-off-by: Line Holen Thanks. Applied. -- Hal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH 8/8] IB/srp: Make queue size configurable

2013-09-12 Thread Jack Wang
On 09/12/2013 12:16 AM, David Dillow wrote: > On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 19:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> If this name was not yet in use in any interface that is visible in user >> space, I would agree that we should come up with a better name. However, >> the SCSI mid-layer already uses that n

Re: [PATCH 8/8] IB/srp: Make queue size configurable

2013-09-12 Thread Bart Van Assche
On 09/12/13 18:16, Jack Wang wrote: On 09/12/2013 12:16 AM, David Dillow wrote: On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 19:44 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: If this name was not yet in use in any interface that is visible in user space, I would agree that we should come up with a better name. However, the SCSI mi

RE: [PATCH V2 2/4] IB/usnic: Cisco VIC - driver part 1/3

2013-09-12 Thread Hefty, Sean
> We are using the RoCE ethertype in the MAC frames, and that is all of the > similarity between usNIC protocol and RoCE. L3 is not the GRH, but rather > a usNIC L3 header. Customers can distinguish between RoCE traffic and > usNIC traffic by looking at the version of the L3 frame. It is set to

Re: [PATCH V4 9/9] IB/mlx4: Enable mlx4_ib support for MODIFY_QP_EX

2013-09-12 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 03:24:46PM +0300, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Let me clarify this. The idea is that current RoCE applications will > run as is after they update "their" librdmacm, since its this > library that works with the new uverbs entries. Or, we are not supposed to break userspace. You can'

Re: [PATCH V2 2/4] IB/usnic: Cisco VIC - driver part 1/3

2013-09-12 Thread Upinder Malhi (umalhi)
We are using the RoCE ethertype in the MAC frames, and that is all of the similarity between usNIC protocol and RoCE. L3 is not the GRH, but rather a usNIC L3 header. Customers can distinguish between RoCE traffic and usNIC traffic by looking at the version of the L3 frame. It is set to 6 for