On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we need
opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-)
Why does a single OpenSM need to handle multiple subnets/fabrics ?
What's the issue with running multiple OpenSMs with
- Original Message -
On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we
need
opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-)
Why does a single OpenSM need to handle multiple subnets/fabrics ?
What's the
On 3/5/2012 10:28 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we
need
opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-)
Why does a single OpenSM need to handle
- Original Message -
On 3/5/2012 10:28 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
- Original Message -
On 3/1/2012 8:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
I would say we are simply getting to the point where we *know* we
need
opensm to handle more than one fabric from a single instance ;-)
Why
On 14:46 Thu 01 Mar , Ira Weiny wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:15:02 -0600
Brian Ginsbach ginsb...@cray.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:47:00PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:22 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
Doug,
First thanks for this. Some comments below.
On 11:22 Wed 29 Feb , Ira Weiny wrote:
Doug,
First thanks for this. Some comments below.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:01:16 -0500
Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
There are two things that stand in the way of opensm being run on
redundant fabrics easily:
1) The opensm init
On 3/2/2012 5:30 AM, Alex Netes wrote:
On 11:22 Wed 29 Feb , Ira Weiny wrote:
Doug,
First thanks for this. Some comments below.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:01:16 -0500
Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
There are two things that stand in the way of opensm being run on
redundant
On 3/2/2012 10:31 AM, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 3/2/2012 5:30 AM, Alex Netes wrote:
What the default opensm.conf would be used for? Just as a reference to the
default values?
No, he's referring to having a default config file that is parsed, then
an override config file that is parsed where
On 02/29/2012 09:15 PM, Brian Ginsbach wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:47:00PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:22 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
Doug,
First thanks for this. Some comments below.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:01:16 -0500
Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
There are two
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:15:02 -0600
Brian Ginsbach ginsb...@cray.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 02:47:00PM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote:
On 02/29/2012 02:22 PM, Ira Weiny wrote:
Doug,
First thanks for this. Some comments below.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:01:16 -0500
Doug
Doug,
First thanks for this. Some comments below.
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:01:16 -0500
Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com wrote:
There are two things that stand in the way of opensm being run on
redundant fabrics easily:
1) The opensm init script only starts one instance of opensm and opensm
There are two things that stand in the way of opensm being run on
redundant fabrics easily:
1) The opensm init script only starts one instance of opensm and opensm
will only work on one fabric per instance
2) Even if you start multiple instances, you have to hand modify config
files for each
12 matches
Mail list logo
