On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Are you sure that your devices don't just handle READ_6 and SENSE_6 ok?
I'm pretty sure your devices just handle it.
Because adding some debugging code seems to clearly show that when you
moved the setting of "use_10_for_XX" to the scanning phase,
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003, Matthew Dharm wrote:
>
> This is actually the second complaint I've gotten along these lines... in
> the other case, it appeared that the MODE_SENSE/MODE_SENSE_10 logic had
> gotten screwed up.
>
> I think it might actually be a merging problem somewhere along the line,
> bec
³Ï Õ÷ ´ú Àí
ÎÒ¹«Ë¾ÎªÊýÂë²úƷרҵÉú²úÉÌ¡£Ö÷Òª²úƷΪusb flash
disk¡£²úÆ·Ô¶ÏúÅ·ÃÀ¡£¼¼ÊõÁìÏÈ¡£Îª¹úÄÚusb2.0uÅÌÁìÏÈÉú²úÕß¡£ÏÖ¹«Ë¾³ÏÑû¸÷µØÇøIT¾«Ó¢ºÏ×÷£¬ÍƹãÊý×ÖÁ¦Á¿ÏµÁÐuÅÌ¡£ÁíÓÐuÅÌ+mp3¶þºÏÒ»²¥·ÅÆ÷¡£³Ð½Óoem£¬³ÏÕ÷´úÀí¡£
»¶Ó¹ã´óÐÂÀÏÅóÓÑÀ´µçÀ´º¯´¹Ñ¯¡£
µç»°£º0755£83254907
´«Õ棺0755£832549
Hi Vojtech,
Please pull from:
bk://kernel.bkbits.net/acme/usb-2.5
device->rdesc is freed in hid_free_device.
Best Regards,
- Arnaldo
You can import this changeset into BK by piping this whole message to:
'| bk receive [path to repository]' or apply the patch as usual.
===
This is actually the second complaint I've gotten along these lines... in
the other case, it appeared that the MODE_SENSE/MODE_SENSE_10 logic had
gotten screwed up.
I think it might actually be a merging problem somewhere along the line,
because my tree (which is based off of the USB tree) works j
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 02:35:44PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > > Here's a patch from Tony Luck that fixes a problem with the UHCI
> > > debugging code on architectures with big page sizes. We end up
> > > allocating more than km
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > Here's a patch from Tony Luck that fixes a problem with the UHCI
> > debugging code on architectures with big page sizes. We end up
> > allocating more than kmalloc allows.
> >
> > Please apply. Thanks!
> >
> > JE
> >
> > ==
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> > Here's a patch from Tony Luck that fixes a problem with the UHCI
> > debugging code on architectures with big page sizes. We end up
> > allocating more than kmalloc allows.
> >
> > Please apply. Thanks!
> >
> > JE
> >
> > ==
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Johannes Erdfelt wrote:
> Here's a patch from Tony Luck that fixes a problem with the UHCI
> debugging code on architectures with big page sizes. We end up
> allocating more than kmalloc allows.
>
> Please apply. Thanks!
>
> JE
>
> = drivers/usb/host
USB storage is broken for me recently (like in the last 5 days or so). My
good old SIIG USB-2 "hi-speed" CF reader that used to be very reliable now
will refuse to even read the partition table.
The problem _seems_ to be that somebody broken the READ_10 logic, and it
now always does a READ_6. W
Hey Sergey,
Thanks for the help. :)
> > When reading events from my device, some of the events are being
filtered
> > out by this line of code in hid-core.c. It was in .hid_input_field(),
> > around line 777.
> >
> > if (value[n] == field->value[n]) continue;
> >
> > If I disable it, ev
Here's a patch from Tony Luck that fixes a problem with the UHCI
debugging code on architectures with big page sizes. We end up
allocating more than kmalloc allows.
Please apply. Thanks!
JE
= drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c 1.5 vs edited =
--- 1.5/drivers/usb/host/uhci-debug.c Mon Dec 30
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 10:26:16 -0600
Jackson Chan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having two issues trying to use the hiddev interface(kernel 2.4.20).
>
> When reading events from my device, some of the events are being filtered
> out by this line of code in hid-core.c. It was in .hid_input_fi
Hi there,
I am having two issues trying to use the hiddev interface(kernel 2.4.20).
When reading events from my device, some of the events are being filtered
out by this line of code in hid-core.c. It was in .hid_input_field(),
around line 777.
if (value[n] == field->value[n]) continu
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:47:02AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > 3.
> > > I've noticed that usb-storage doesn't remove the disk from /proc/scsi/scsi
> > > (the representation of kernel scsi device list)
> > > when the device is disconnected. Because of t
15 matches
Mail list logo
