Re: [linux-usb-devel] (Gadget) Regression in PXA2xx-udc

2003-10-19 Thread Joshua Wise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 20 October 2003 12:12 am, David Brownell wrote: > No, IPR is set _implicitly_ when the FIFO fills ... that's > why it's only set _explicitly_ to send short packets. See the > UDC spec; you just made it send a full packet (16 bytes) followed

Re: [linux-usb-devel] (Gadget) Regression in PXA2xx-udc

2003-10-19 Thread Joshua Wise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 20 October 2003 12:14 am, Joshua Wise wrote: > Anyway, handhelds.org CVS seems to "work". Well, except for that, uh, issue > where, uh, OUT packets in bulk just stopped working. But I'll debug that > Soon. :) Correction. They work every othe

Re: [linux-usb-devel] (Gadget) Regression in PXA2xx-udc

2003-10-19 Thread David Brownell
Although if it wasn't a Heisenbug at the very least it's a Schroedenbug! I noticed that it shouldn't've ever worked, as it didn't seem like we were setting IPR if it wasn't a short packet. In write_ep0_fifo(), I changed/added: } else if (ep->dev->req_pending) ep0start(e

Re: PATCH: (as114b) [was Re: [linux-usb-devel] unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h]

2003-10-19 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 18 October 2003 23:08, Phil Dibowitz wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Alan, thanks so much for all your help (as well as everyone else > who's helped on this). > >One more 'bug' I've noticed... not sure if this is specific to this >patch, or my recently upgraded

Re: [linux-usb-devel] (Gadget) Regression in PXA2xx-udc

2003-10-19 Thread Joshua Wise
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Not likely a Heisenbug ... more likely just that some of what you > thought you'd "fixed" just changed the timing enough to mask some > kind of problem! When I'm touching that level of code, I've > found that removing more than one printk at a time

Re: [linux-usb-devel] (Gadget) Regression in PXA2xx-udc

2003-10-19 Thread David Brownell
Joshua Wise wrote: I'm now seeing some more interesting behavior. We get a GET_DESCRIPTOR request, *seem* to send a short in, but for whatever reason, the host doesn't get it. BTW, I got it working earlier today, and stupidly failed to check in my changes. (Hmm, just clean up a few printks here,

[linux-usb-devel] fix: race between usbdev_release and usb_disable_device in 2.6

2003-10-19 Thread Andrei Lahun
Hello . I just found out that with latest 2.6 test i have hard lock when i remove my Alcatel USB cable. I managed to found a reason: when i remove cable - usb_disconnect function called which call usb_disable_device at the same time usbdefvs try to free some internal data and call usbdev_release

[linux-usb-devel] Re: When will new development effort start?

2003-10-19 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 11:16:37AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg: > > Do you have any idea when serious new development will re-commence? Has it ever really stopped? :) > There's a bunch of things I'd like to do, and it would nice to know how > long they will have to stay on the back burn

Re: PATCH: (as114b) [was Re: [linux-usb-devel] unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h]

2003-10-19 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Alan Stern wrote: It is a SCSI bug, and it was recently tracked down by Matthias Urlichs. See http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=6252693 I was excited there for a second, but that patch already made it into test8 which I'm running. I guess I should take this over the SCSI gu

[linux-usb-devel] When will new development effort start?

2003-10-19 Thread Alan Stern
Greg: Do you have any idea when serious new development will re-commence? There's a bunch of things I'd like to do, and it would nice to know how long they will have to stay on the back burner. (That includes a scheme for fixing this recent problem with non-compliant USB devices having inva

[linux-usb-devel] Re: ACM USB modem on Kernel 2.6.0-test

2003-10-19 Thread David Brownell
In fact, here's a patch with that very change. Does it make current 2.6.0-test kernels work "out of the box" again with your USB modems? Yes, it works with ELSA Microlink USB. Thanks. Hmm. Too early. I get either a "acm: probe of 3-3:2.1 failed with error -5" but it works or a Unable to handle ke

Re: PATCH: (as114b) [was Re: [linux-usb-devel] unneeded SubClass and Protocol entries in unusual_devs.h]

2003-10-19 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > One more 'bug' I've noticed... not sure if this is specific to this > patch, or my recently upgraded -test7 kernel, or... > > If I connect the camera it gets added at /dev/sda1. If I disconnect the > camera, the usb drivers tell me: > > ~ Oct 18 20:0

[linux-usb-devel] 2.6.0-test[78] - Oops and EPIPEs with uhci and speedtouch device

2003-10-19 Thread Jakub Bogusz
The first thing: I'm getting an Oops on 2.6.0-test8 (and -test7) when trying to strace (with -e trace=ioctl) modem_run utility when one instance was (almost) successfully run. (without speedtch module loaded, only usbcore and uhci_hcd, so it cannot be caused by speedtch module). modem_run[2898]:

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [MPIO-devel] Re: MPIO support and rio500...

2003-10-19 Thread Markus Germeier
Hello Greg, Hello all, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about: > (3) rewrite MPIO code to use libusb/usbfs to not require any kernel > module at all. > > Could that be possible? Is there anything that you need to do that > requires a kernel module? In looking at the rio500 driver, it