Trading_A|ert FOR 01-26-06
EVER-GL0RY_INTERNATI0NAL_GR0UP_INC. (E.G.L.Y)
WE CALLED IT AT .38 CENTS NOW ITS AT $2.45! UP 23% WEDNESDAY!!
WITH A LOT MORE ROOM TO MOVE! WE EXPECT IT TO
BE TRADING AROUND AT 5-6 D0||ARS BY EARLY NEXT MONTH!
A MAJOR PR CAMPAIGN IS UNDERWAY FOR THURSDAY AND THE
REST
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:31:35PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> My earlier experiment (adding a clear-halt for the interrupt-in endpoint)
> failed. It turns out that it does cause problems for other devices. And
> it wasn't needed anyway; a simple blacklist entry was enough to get my HP
> keyboa
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:50:02 -0800, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good new is, next version of pilot-link (or possibly this version)
> accesses the device through libusb/usbfs, and doesn't touch the kernel
> driver at all.
I don't know if we should consider this good news. The pilot-link
i
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 11:44:14PM +1300, Reuben Farrelly wrote:
>
>
> On 25/01/2006 8:24 p.m., Andrew Morton wrote:
> >http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm3/
> >
> >- Dropped the timekeeping patch series due to a complex timesource
> >selection
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 11:29:50PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> We have reasonable new kernels in Rawhide, 2.6.15 or 2.6.16-rc1, and they
> do this:
>
> visor 2-1:1.0: Handspring Visor / Palm OS converter detected
> usb 2-1: Handspring Visor / Palm OS converter now attached to ttyUSB0
> usb 2-1: H
Trading_A|ert FOR 01-26-06
EVER-GL0RY_INTERNATI0NAL_GR0UP_INC. (E.G.L.Y)
WE CALLED IT AT .38 CENTS NOW ITS AT $2.45! UP 23% WEDNESDAY!!
WITH A LOT MORE ROOM TO MOVE! WE EXPECT IT TO
BE TRADING AROUND AT 5-6 D0||ARS BY EARLY NEXT MONTH!
A MAJOR PR CAMPAIGN IS UNDERWAY FOR THURSDAY AND THE
REST
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:11:21AM +0530, Kalyan Alle wrote:
>
> I have aproblem with my hot plug usb based network device
Which device are you using?
Which driver are you using?
Which kernel are you using?
> ..if
> u plug and remove more than 4 ,5 times it is not allowing to remove
> th
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 06:30:41PM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:11:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > "appropriated" from whom? Does the USB.org group recognize this 0xfffe
> > vendor id?
> >
> > thanks,
> > greg k-h
>
> I doubt they recognize it.
Are you positive no
The email was deleted by system policy.
Attached file might be containing virus.
Connection From: 127.0.0.1
From: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:39:12 +0900
Subject: Fw:
--- Scan information follows ---
Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File At
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:11:23PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>
> "appropriated" from whom? Does the USB.org group recognize this 0xfffe
> vendor id?
>
> thanks,
> greg k-h
I doubt they recognize it. However, it's about 60,000 higher than any
others that have been allocated, so it seemed like a rea
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:45:33 -0800 (PST), "Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > >> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > ACKed-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > >> +#define USB_VENDOR_ID_HP0x03f0
> > >> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_HP_USBHUB_KB 0x
The email was deleted by system policy.
Attached file might be containing virus.
Connection From: 127.0.0.1
From: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:00:59 +0900
Subject: Fw: Sexy
--- Scan information follows ---
Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fil
The email was deleted by system policy.
Attached file might be containing virus.
Connection From: 127.0.0.1
From: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:21:27 +0900
Subject: Fw:
--- Scan information follows ---
Virus Name: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
File At
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 09:58:43AM -0800, Eric Blossom wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:12:38AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > --- Urspr?ngliche Nachricht ---
> > Datum: 24.01.2006 23:24
> > Von: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Betreff: Re: [linux-usb
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Michael Fischer wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:31:35 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> This patch (as643) removes the clear-halt call and adds the blacklist
> >> entry.
> >>
> >
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EM
Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:31:35 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This patch (as643) removes the clear-halt call and adds the blacklist
entry.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACKed-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+#de
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:31:35 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch (as643) removes the clear-halt call and adds the blacklist
> entry.
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACKed-by: Pete Zaitcev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> +#define USB_VENDOR_ID_HP 0x0
Willi:
There's an updated version of the usbhid patch at
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=11381719717&w=2
Can you please try it out and make sure it works okay? If it does, I'll
submit it for inclusion in the kernel.
Alan Stern
-
Greg:
My earlier experiment (adding a clear-halt for the interrupt-in endpoint)
failed. It turns out that it does cause problems for other devices. And
it wasn't needed anyway; a simple blacklist entry was enough to get my HP
keyboard working.
This patch (as643) removes the clear-halt call an
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:49:43 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't understand what you mean here. How does a disconnect cause a
> forceful close?
I'll get back to you on this.
> Here's the next version of the patch. If you give the okay I'll submit
> it to Greg. []
Lo
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:19:02 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > There was a mistake in my patch, an == that should have been !=.
>
> You are not the first and not the last to be trapped by a function
> returning a boolean instea
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:48:37 -0500 (EST), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That leaves the question of what to do with my buggy keyboard. Maybe it
> would be best to have a blacklist entry for devices that don't like
> hid_init_reports.
OK. I had trouble with HP kit before (and Compaq b
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > I was afraid of this. On the whole, it's probably safer to remove the
> > clear-halt. It's not really a good idea to send it to an endpoint that
> > isn't halted.
> >
> > That leaves the question of what to do with my buggy keyboard. Maybe it
>
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 02:48:37PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Johannes Deisenhofer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > This patch (as577) adds a Clear-Halt call on the Interrupt-in endpoint
> > > during input device configuration. Without it my HP USB keyboard doesn't
> > > work.
> >
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, Johannes Deisenhofer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This patch (as577) adds a Clear-Halt call on the Interrupt-in endpoint
> > during input device configuration. Without it my HP USB keyboard doesn't
> > work.
> >
>
> With this patch, my ruwido Infrared Keyboard does no longer work.
>
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006, David Brownell wrote:
> > Some Intel motherboards have documentation indicating that system wakeup
> > can be enabled by setting some bits in the UHCI controller's PCI config
> > space. Presumably that information is also present in the ACPI tables.
>
> Well, the info that t
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 10:12:38AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
> Datum: 24.01.2006 23:24
> Von: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: [linux-usb-devel] OSDL/GNU vendors id?
>
> > What does OSDL or GNU have to do with this
> Some Intel motherboards have documentation indicating that system wakeup
> can be enabled by setting some bits in the UHCI controller's PCI config
> space. Presumably that information is also present in the ACPI tables.
Well, the info that the controller can issue system wakeups, though
not abo
Some of these are already in MontaVista's 2.6.10 kernels,
with the Mentor highspeed OTG stuff in the works.
This adds declarations for three USB peripheral controllers:
- Two high speed USB cores that can be licensed from Mentor Graphics
to be integrated into silicon:
* "musbhsfc" is
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David Brownell wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 10:43 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Helmut Toplitzer wrote:
> > > @@ -300,11 +162,11 @@
> > >bPwrOn2PwrGood 10 * 2 milli seconds
> > >bHubContrCurrent 0 milli Ampere
> > >DeviceRemovable
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David Brownell wrote:
> Last I looked at UHCI docs, there wasn't any other way to tell
> whether system wakeup was supported ... short of looking at the
> ACPI tables that are currently in /proc/acpi/wakeup and not yet
> integrated into the driver model. (Assuming ACPI is in
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006, David Brownell wrote:
> (Removed jinzhucheng -- "@tom.com" -- from CC list so
> this thread stops landing in my SPAM box...)
> > Deferred response to the STATUS stage is my question. The Gadget API
> > doesn't seem to have any provision for supporting it at all.
>
> No, bu
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 04:12:57PM -0500, Doug Sutherland wrote:
> Due to hardware and support issues, we are not able to upgrade to
> Linux 2.6 at this time.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 04:55:37PM -0500, Greg KH wrote:
>What are these "hardware and support issues"? Are there drivers present
>in 2
On 25/01/2006 8:24 p.m., Andrew Morton wrote:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm3/
- Dropped the timekeeping patch series due to a complex timesource selection
bug.
- Various fixes and updates.
Generally quite good again :)
I'm seeing
Hi,
--- Ursprüngliche Nachricht ---
Datum: 24.01.2006 23:24
Von: Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-usb-devel] OSDL/GNU vendors id?
> What does OSDL or GNU have to do with this at all?
They are just groups that might be the ones that own and use a public
vendor
35 matches
Mail list logo
