[linux-usb-devel] pl2303 revisited

2007-04-21 Thread Gene Heskett
Hi guys; I am using one of these as the interface between belkins upsd daemon and the ups, This particular one says its a radio shack model according to lsusb -v: == Bus 002 Device 003: ID 1453:4026 Radio Shack 26-183 Serial Cable Device Descriptor: bLength18 bDescriptorT

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH pd54] Remove Huawei unusual_devs entry

2007-04-21 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 19 April 2007, linlei 60022748 wrote: > Hi everyone, Hi back ... please fix your email tools to line-wrap correctly sometime before the 80th character of each line. > We consider it's not the appropriate status of E220 which > has no CD-ROM. In MS-Windows, while plug the device into

Re: [linux-usb-devel] [PATCH pd54] Remove Huawei unusual_devs entry

2007-04-21 Thread Phil Dibowitz
Alan Cox wrote: >> This "small piece of source" seems be the better solution because ppl >> from Huawei stated it will work... > > The small piece of code isn't even distribution shippable - consider for > example the firmware files with it - I can find no license. > > > If the right way to do

Re: [linux-usb-devel] how can i use usb_skeleton.c

2007-04-21 Thread Wael Adel
forgive me, i still have another question: i m using kerenl 2.6.18 and inside the kernel source there is usb-skeleton.c that contains the defines the following: #define USB_SKEL_MINOR_BASE 192 1. so when i make my device node i should make the major number 180 and the minor number 192 , 2. an

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.21rc7 autoresume fails on Seagate FreeAgent drives

2007-04-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Wolf Faust wrote: > > You haven't provided a clear description of what the problem is. It would > > help to see a dmesg log with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG turned on. > > Dear Alan, > > just just wanted to ask first before posting dlogs. So here I go with > the details about the pr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest tests on USB 2.0 full speed device

2007-04-21 Thread David Brownell
On Saturday 21 April 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > Test 14 passes when given suitable parameters (eg size 256, vary 1 by > test.sh); > the defaults fail with EINVAL. Now running test.sh for a thorough test. And when that runs over the whole weekend, you've hit the first major milestone ... take

Re: [linux-usb-devel] 2.6.21rc7 autoresume fails on Seagate FreeAgent drives

2007-04-21 Thread Wolf Faust
> You haven't provided a clear description of what the problem is. It would > help to see a dmesg log with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG turned on. Dear Alan, just just wanted to ask first before posting dlogs. So here I go with the details about the problem with the Seagate FreeAgent drives: 1. Boot syst

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest tests on USB 2.0 full speed device

2007-04-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 11:40:11AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > Now I'm getting confused. Your driver runs on the device and usbtest > > > runs on the host. How can the host get confused about the device's > > > speed, > > > and what could your

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest tests on USB 2.0 full speed device

2007-04-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Now I'm getting confused. Your driver runs on the device and usbtest > > runs on the host. How can the host get confused about the device's speed, > > and what could your driver possibly do to confuse it? > > I don't know? All I know is that usbt

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest tests on USB 2.0 full speed device

2007-04-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 10:59:18AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > > 3. udev->speed is actually an unknown value (not _LOW, _FULL or _HIGH) > > > > for my device apparently. I haven't researched this yet; is there an > > > > obvious reason? > > > > > > W

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest tests on USB 2.0 full speed device

2007-04-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > 3. udev->speed is actually an unknown value (not _LOW, _FULL or _HIGH) > > > for my device apparently. I haven't researched this yet; is there an > > > obvious reason? > > > > What on earth are you talking about? It must be USB_SPEED_FULL. Have y

Re: [linux-usb-devel] how can i use usb_skeleton.c

2007-04-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, Wael Adel wrote: > but if the OMAP kit have different endpoints i.e it has 2 out endpoints and > 2 in endpoints, can my both application talk to the kit in the same time. > since i cant make differenet endpoints on the host side for each > application? Your driver can registe

Re: [linux-usb-devel] hid drivers

2007-04-21 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007, John Wojnaroski wrote: > I've READ the specs, examined countless examples, browsed innumerable > websites. This is a silly, simple little keyboard device customized to > handle static switches. It has one endpoint and takes a three byte > command and sends a three byte pa

Re: [linux-usb-devel] usbtest tests on USB 2.0 full speed device

2007-04-21 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 11:15:25AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 21 Apr 2007, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > 1. Why would I be getting ETIMEDOUT instead of the expected EPIPE? It > > looks like this will affect a lot of tests in case 10 too. > > ETIMEDOUT means that the gadget didn't reply to the