es.
With some quick grep'ing, I think this patch is wrong, since only PPC
doesn't have its ide_fix_driveid() as a non-inline. Paul, what do you
think about moving ppc_generic_fix_driveid() out of
arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c and into include/asm-ppc/ide.h ?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
h
at Dave M has said
about it tho.
But if someone needs to have this working for them right now, this
shoudl tell you what you need. :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Stuff,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:26:24PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:18:52PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > Since I'
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:29:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> > > > Is
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 03:09:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:42:14AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Since I've been looking at the serial stuff again, I just remembered
> > that the USB serial stuff has similar (ab)uses of dep_mbool/dep_tristate
> >
Since I've been looking at the serial stuff again, I just remembered
that the USB serial stuff has similar (ab)uses of dep_mbool/dep_tristate
that drivers/usb/Config.in used to have.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= drivers/usb/serial/Config.in 1.13 vs e
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:05:00AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:04:04AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 12,
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 10:29:42AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:36:42AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:29:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> > > > Is
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 09:29:47AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> > Is it possible to add some printk() calls in the probe function to
> > determine where it goes wrong?
[snip]
> And the prink I inserted at the top of
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 12:02:52AM +0200, Jeroen Vreeken wrote:
> On 2002.06.11 23:54:42 +0200 Tom Rini wrote:
> > I'm seeing the following oops when I plug in my old Kensington video cam
> > (se401 driver used to work, but it's been 6+ months since I tried):
[sni
SE401 usb camera driver version 0.23 registering
usb.c: registered new driver se401
mice: PS/2 mouse device common for all mice
This is all from 2.4.19-pre10,
o test the se401 driver. I think this
isn't quite right. The MODULE tests should go, but the PROC_FS &&
VIDEO_PROC_FS tests should be moved up to catch videodev_proc_create().
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 08:00:11PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Montag, 10. Juni 2002 19:46 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 07:33:18PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > this change set against 2.4 introduces a #define to be used by the
> > > drive
27;t do SMP. And this isn't
just a USB problem either, USB is just the current good example.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
Currently, drivers/usb/core/drivers.c includes to get at
. The following includes directly.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= drivers/usb/core/drivers.c 1.7 vs edited =
--- 1.7/drivers/usb/core/drivers.c Fri Apr 19 00:35:36 2002
+++ edited/drivers/usb/core
On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:53:33PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
> >Hello. I'm having a problem with 2.5.18, OHCI-HCD and the ACM driver on
> >PPC.
> >Right now my Elsa Microlink 56k modem isn't recognized again after it's
> >unplugged
ortstatus [1] = 0x00020100 PESC PPS
hub.c: port 1, portstatus 100, change 2, 12 Mb/s
hub.c: hub / port 1 enable change, status 100
hub.c: port 2, portstatus 303, change 0, 1.5 Mb/s
# Finally unplug ACM again.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http:
ultiple platforms.
And, ick, arch/$(ARCH)/drivers is OK now? We do that on PPC right now
for 8xx/82xx, and I'm going to try and get rid of that in 2.5.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
*
*
* USB port drivers
*
*
* USB Serial Converter support
*
*
* USB Miscellaneous drivers
*
> Your option (b) used to be the way the file was, before we started
> having better dependancy usage in the Config.in file :)
Better, but more annoying, depe
t go and break
things like ARM and PPC 8xx USB which work outside the kernel and aren't
in the slightest like x86, but can be made to work now. I was just
making sure no one forgot about 'em :)
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
_
e with 2.5 and 2.4 being
different regardless. This happend (generically) in 2.2 a few times to
make backporting easier, yes?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 10:16:32PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 11. Dezember 2001 21:53 schrieb Tom Rini:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 09:42:02PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > IMHO, since the only safe thing to do across all architectures is to
> >
et. So perhaps
we shouldn't do anything to 2.4 and backport what 2.5 has when it's
stable.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
rs, but not out
yet. I'd be more than happy to try and test these changes, if they go
in.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/list
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 06:40:36PM -0400, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Of course, uhci is only used on x86, so all is fine here,
Keep in mind there were (and probably still are) PCI-based UHCI cards.
I've got one around here w/ a VIA chip on it.
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.or
) Hopefully this
one will get picked up.. BTW, it sort of looks like yours misses a few
things, look at the attached.. (I basically took what printer.c did and
moved it into scanner.[ch]
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= scanner.c 1.4 vs edited =
--- 1.4/drivers/us
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:25:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 03:39:11PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > + if (scn->devfs == NULL)
> > + err("scanner%d: device node registration failed", scn_minor);
>
> Make this a "dbg&q
On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:46:11PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:42:45PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > I changed that in the version I use but forgot to do that here as well,
> > sorry. Want me to re-sent w/o this or can you just edit it out? It woul
w-rw1 lp lp 180, 0 Dec 31 1969 /dev/usb/lp0
> >
> > I think the comment is wrong :)
>
> I saw it and thought that allowing users to steal status from
> bidirectional printers is not such a swell idea, s
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 09:01:17PM -0700, Mark McClelland wrote:
> Tom Rini wrote:
>
> > Hello. The attached patch makes the 'normal' USB scanner register w/ devfs.
> > Comments/questions/et al? Thanks..
>
> IIRC, people who had devfs disabled were complaini
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Monday, 14. May 2001 23:31, Tom Rini wrote:
> > Hello. The attached patch makes the 'normal' USB scanner register w/
> > devfs. Comments/questions/et al? Thanks..
>
> You may pass a null
I was looking at the USB printer driver for a quick how-to on devfs'ing
a driver, and in usblp_probe, the comments above devfs_reigster say:
"Create with perms=664", but there's a missing | S_IROTH in the call so
it creates with 660. So either the comment or the code is wron
Hello. The attached patch makes the 'normal' USB scanner register w/ devfs.
Comments/questions/et al? Thanks..
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
= scanner.c 1.4 vs edited =
--- 1.4/drivers/usb/scanner.c Fri Apr 20 10:17:25 2001
+++ edited/scanner.c
n't
be working?
--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
34 matches
Mail list logo
