From: Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 11:37:50 -0700
hub.c | 78
hub.h | 17
The bulk of it is my semaphore that Alan adopted. Linus swore
like a sailor when he saw it, so it did not go in.
The following snippet
The following snippet is curious (Alan's tree has the unlock):
@@ -845,7 +838,6 @@
dbg(usb_hub_thread exiting);
- unlock_kernel();
complete_and_exit(khubd_exited, 0);
}
I have no idea what is right, above.
I believe the unlock is right - its basically
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:29:55PM -0700, Dmitri wrote:
I think these patches will be merged into Linus's tree automagically,
like it happened in 2.4.10 cycle with usbvideo code - when Alan ships
mega-patches to Linus. There is no point in races of identical patches,
unless one wants to see
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 11:37:50AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Hi all,
In looking at the drivers/usb trees between 2.4.11-pre1 and 2.4.10-ac2,
I see a lot of differences. Some drivers are newer in one tree and not
the other and there are new files in the -ac tree.
For usb-uhci/uhci all of the
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:48:59PM +0200, Georg Acher wrote:
For usb-uhci/uhci all of the changes (as far I can see) touch the
uhci-common.h, which appeared and vanished again in 2.4.10-pre*. So I would
consider Linus' version more up-to-date. But I miss my anti-crash fix for
usb-uhci...
On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 13:41, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 12:29:55PM -0700, Dmitri wrote:
I have one minor patch outstanding, though (hotplugging fix). It should
be one line change in ibmcam.c and ultracam.c files - when it is ready.
Ok, then I will leave the video files alone
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:03:59PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:48:59PM +0200, Georg Acher wrote:
For usb-uhci/uhci all of the changes (as far I can see) touch the
uhci-common.h, which appeared and vanished again in 2.4.10-pre*. So I would
consider Linus' version
