On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:47:48AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> That's a definite weakness of the old scheme and part of the reason it was
> changed for 2.5. In the meantime, you can try doing this. After you've
> switched the drives, do "echo scsi remove-single-device 0 1 2 3
> >/proc/scsi/scsi
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:47:02AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > 3.
> > > I've noticed that usb-storage doesn't remove the disk from /proc/scsi/scsi
> > > (the representation of kernel scsi device list)
> > > when the device is disconnected. Because of t
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:29:58PM +0200, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:47:02AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > 3.
> > > I've noticed that usb-storage doesn't remove the disk from /proc/scsi/scsi
> > > (the representation of kernel scsi device list)
> > > when the device is discon
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 11:47:02AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > 3.
> > I've noticed that usb-storage doesn't remove the disk from /proc/scsi/scsi
> > (the representation of kernel scsi device list)
> > when the device is disconnected. Because of that, I cannot connect a
> > different hard disk to u
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:10:21PM +0100, Major A wrote:
>
> What's the host controller you're using? I used to see the same
> problem here, but it went away altogether with a couple of patches
> (which you seem to have applied) and a different EHCI controller.
>
VT6202, se
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 10:25:29AM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> >Also there was a patch from David with the subject line:
> >"[patch 2.5.70] ehci, fix qh re-activation problem"
> >Does this problem exist in some form in 2.4?
>
> Of course ... but the fix is in 2.4.21-ac1, and will
> be in the ne
the USB-IDE bridge was at least part of the bottleneck here. Writes
are less problematic -- you just dump the data in bulk OUT packets and
the bridge writes to IDE whatever it can whenever it can.
At high speed there's a PING protocol too ... basically the
device can let the host know when a buffe
Vedran Rodic wrote:
Hi
Unfortunaltely, I had a couple of problems with ehci on usb-storage since
my last report. I've applied ehci-hcd micro-patch from David. I use
2.4.21-rc8-ac1 (basicaly equivalent to 2.4.21-ac1 + ehci-hcd micro patch USB
wise).
2.4.21-ac1 + micro-patch is currently your best
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Major A wrote:
> > > About possible performance improvement on 2.5 ehci/usb-storage:
> > > I've tested with 2.5.71, and I don't see a significant improvement over 2.4.
> > > (Both are arround 7.7 MB/s for read, 10 MB/s for write). Disk can do arround
> > > 40 MB/s reads on I
> In itself that timeout isn't necessarily bad, but in practice it usually
> seems to indicate a problem with EHCI. More extensive debugging
> information would help here. If it's not a host controller problem then
> we should be able to recover from the error. But without knowing what the
>
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Vedran Rodic wrote:
> Hi
>
> Unfortunaltely, I had a couple of problems with ehci on usb-storage since
> my last report. I've applied ehci-hcd micro-patch from David. I use
> 2.4.21-rc8-ac1 (basicaly equivalent to 2.4.21-ac1 + ehci-hcd micro patch USB
> wise).
>
> Also the
Hi
Unfortunaltely, I had a couple of problems with ehci on usb-storage since
my last report. I've applied ehci-hcd micro-patch from David. I use
2.4.21-rc8-ac1 (basicaly equivalent to 2.4.21-ac1 + ehci-hcd micro patch USB
wise).
Also there was a patch from David with the subject line:
"[patch 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
