That's just it, this is a Red Hat 9 box so why are we talking about Windoze
machines? I've never seen a Linux box come up with this route before and
that's why I emailed the list.
I'm well aware of how Windoze machines work, if this was a Windoze question
I'd email MS.
Hmm, I'm coming across
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 09:22:11AM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> howeverI have never seen a non windows box come up with a
> 169.254.x.x IP address on dhcp failure. On all the implementations I
> have seen, once dhcp times out the interface does not come up, nor
> does it make an entry in the routi
Monday, 25 August, 2003
http://computerworld.co.nz/webhome.nsf/NL/5F97DC00E6E93AD9CC256D89007A08C2
NZOSS hires 'big dog' to fight SCO
NZOSS calls Linux users together to discuss legal options
Anthony Doesburg, Auckland
The New Zealand Open Source Society is hiring “a big dog” — in the form
of a QC
passwords set up correctly?
how are you mounting the windows boxes? as what user?
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003 09:30:46 +1200
"Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last time I asked this question I got no replies but I am not giving up.
>
> We have, at home, several Windows boxes wit
Last time I asked this question I got no replies but I am not giving up.
We have, at home, several Windows boxes with shared folders which we can
read and write to from other Windows boxes.
I can also read and write to my Samba shares on my Linux boxes from the
Windows boxes.
My problem is that
howeverI have never seen a non windows box come up with a
169.254.x.x IP address on dhcp failure. On all the implementations I
have seen, once dhcp times out the interface does not come up, nor does
it make an entry in the routing table.
on greping my redhat box I find some entries in this fil
On Mon, 2003-08-25 at 09:13, Nick Rout wrote:
> What about giving each user their own space in ~user/public_html (which
> will appear on the net as http://server/~user/ ) and then share each
> user's home dir with samba, they can play with their own pages, but
> no-one elses?
Yeah - I'm gonna do s
What about giving each user their own space in ~user/public_html (which
will appear on the net as http://server/~user/ ) and then share each
user's home dir with samba, they can play with their own pages, but
no-one elses?
or am i barking up the wrong perennial woody plant having a main trunk and
Andrew Tarr wrote:
I got sick of the KDE desktop that Knoppix installed on my laptop by
default (slow, and the control bar or whatever they call it used up
too much screen real estate)
I have it set up so that it only appears when I move my mouse to the
very bottom of the screen.
Cheers,
Carl.
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 00:36, Chris Hellyar wrote:
> If the client machines are running windows, put samba on the box and let
> users mount /var/www/html (or /www ,whatever takes your fancy) directly
> and edit the pages using frontpage without having the hassle of
> upload/download.
>
> This'll
In K Mail bring up the address book. THe short cut key is B.
you must do this from the main mail window not a mail composition window.
otherwise try File AddressBook menus.
under the address book is the ability to make a distribution list which is
your mailing list that you want.
HTH,
shane
O
some of us cant because te Fendalton'ites said no to cables being laid so now
we are the lst place inChch that Telstra-Saturn is going to lay cables.
Believe me, i tried getting Cable, satellite and microwave connection and
unfortunately am still stuck using Telecoms cables on a Paradise Jetstar
Sure did boss, 169.254.x.x is the default range for a machine wanting a
DHCP server... Windows *by default* wants a dhcp server, so if it's
thrown on a network, and perhaps (as we all have done) you leave the IP
stage till later... it will INITIALLY try to seek out a dhcp server...
The router wi
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 10:31:36PM +1200, Michael wrote:
> Nobody read my post properly...
Not true.
> There is no dynamic configurations going on here. I said that
> 169.254.0.0 keeps appearing in my ROUTE table even though NONE of the
> interfaces are configured to receive an IP address via DH
I got sick of the KDE desktop that Knoppix installed on my laptop by
default (slow, and the control bar or whatever they call it used up
too much screen real estate), so I've gone back to windowmaker. For
ICQ I use ickle, and it used to be on my desktop that ickle had a
little applet that sat in t
I did read your post, I was hoping that an explanation of what the
169.254 network was used for might help you figure out what was going
on.
its coming up that way because its configured that way for some reason.
try grepping the /etc/ tree for 169.254, or even just 169
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 22
Col wrote:
Have had another play with it and had the tv tuner, fm radio and
composite input
working under gentoo. The remote supplied with it will require some
googling.
Tv recption isn't the best on some channels and I couldn't find
channel 4 at all.
Anyone know what frequency it is on?
I als
I don't have mandrake installed so i cannot help you with the mandrake
tools for finding or installing the right package.
urpmi is probably your friend. whether it can tell you which uninstalled
package contains the file gtk-config is anyones guess.
try doing
rpm -qa|grep libgtk
this will tell
Nobody read my post properly...
There is no dynamic configurations going on here. I said that 169.254.0.0
keeps appearing in my ROUTE table even though NONE of the interfaces are
configured to receive an IP address via DHCP.
In other words, only one interface is initialised at boot and that ha
Have had another play with it and had the tv tuner, fm radio and
composite input
working under gentoo. The remote supplied with it will require some
googling.
Tv recption isn't the best on some channels and I couldn't find channel
4 at all.
Anyone know what frequency it is on?
I also tried the
Paradise offers unlimited ADSL to businesses (in christchurch, maybe others),
with minimum 256k up/down for $99 a month. Yes unlimited... no caps!
Quoting Andrew Errington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hey Mahesh, you're in Christchurch! Get cable, it's great!
>
> Andy
>
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:27,
> if gtk-config is not there then you probably need to install the package
> that contains it, which looks like libgtk-devel
Sorry! there seems to be 53 different names for this, and i'm still getting my
head around the fact that without the devels the headers and cs aren't
there...
cheers
anto
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:12:50 +0100
antonovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey,
> I know I should already know what this means but I don't! I get this
> when trying to install GOPchop-0.9.1
>
> *** The gtk-config script installed by GTK could not be found
> *** If GTK was installed in PREFIX, mak
Hey Mahesh, you're in Christchurch! Get cable, it's great!
Andy
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:27, Mahesh De Silva wrote:
> Dam it.. i was at least hoping for better national
> traffic!!!
>
> http://www.telecom-media.co.nz/releases_detail.asp?id=2915&page=index
>
> http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/n0822
On Monday 25 August 2003 07:38, you wrote:
> Hey
> does anyone know what i might have to do to get wm9 files to work with
> xmms? I was pretty sure I had the win32 codecs all installed - maybe not?
> They just don't seem to work with any players. Ideas?
crossover
On Monday 25 August 2003 08:12, you wrote:
> Hey,
> I know I should already know what this means but I don't! I get this when
> trying to install GOPchop-0.9.1
>
> *** The gtk-config script installed by GTK could not be found
> *** If GTK was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in
> *** yo
On Sunday 24 August 2003 21:30, you wrote:
> I have OOo1.1, thanks to helpful advice from the group re. wget. (4
> hours 30 minutes and 7 interruptions).
>
> I have "setup."
> I have "setup -net" for a good reason (which I forget) dating from last
> years installation of OOo1.0.
>
> I am told by
I have OOo1.1, thanks to helpful advice from the group re. wget. (4
hours 30 minutes and 7 interruptions).
I have "setup."
I have "setup -net" for a good reason (which I forget) dating from last
years installation of OOo1.0.
I am told by setup -net that I need root privileges.
My fingers hove
Dam it.. i was at least hoping for better national
traffic!!!
http://www.telecom-media.co.nz/releases_detail.asp?id=2915&page=index
http://aardvark.co.nz/daily/2003/n082201.shtml
=
For Linux CD's check out http://www.xsolutions.co.nz
http://search.yahoo.com.au - Yahoo! Search
- Looking for
Hey,
I know I should already know what this means but I don't! I get this when
trying to install GOPchop-0.9.1
*** The gtk-config script installed by GTK could not be found
*** If GTK was installed in PREFIX, make sure PREFIX/bin is in
*** your path, or set the GTK_CONFIG environment variable to
Hey
does anyone know what i might have to do to get wm9 files to work with xmms? I
was pretty sure I had the win32 codecs all installed - maybe not? They just
don't seem to work with any players. Ideas?
cheers
anton
At the Super Shed - a working PC system for not much money running
Mandrake. A notice attached pointed out the (relatively) low spec. of the
machine, but that it was perfectly usable and did not have any Microsoft
software on it.
Andy
I saw that as well. LOL. Whats next? A link to mdk disc 1 and a tutorial
on how to use diskdrake?
Seeing this on an MS site is also quite amusing.
DeviceBoot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 *1500 4016218 83 Linux native (SCSI hard drive 1, partition 1)
/dev/sda2 501 522
Mine has an address book via the Tools -> Address Book menu item. Maybe this
is what you are looking for?
Cheers,
Gareth
On Sunday 24 August 2003 17:30, Warwick & Ian wrote:
> I recently set-up a machine for a Green party researcher running
> Mandrake 9.1 and thought that k-mail would be easier
I recently set-up a machine for a Green party researcher running
Mandrake 9.1 and thought that k-mail would be easier for her to use. I
personally use Evolution.
How do you set-up an address contact list in K-mail?
I must be thick because it is not immediately obvious to me. She is
currently vi
169.254.x.x is the private range for windows machines that have
automatically assigned themselves an address in the event that the dhcp
server they were SPOSED to get an address fromis no longer there...
I'll leave that said, and perhaps that may explain enough...
Andy
On Sun, 2003-08-24 at
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 02:01:11PM +1200, Nick Rout wrote:
> I _think_ the 169.254 network is a default one given when an interface
> cannot get its address via dhcp.
169.254/16 is a link-local IPv4 address range set aside for automatic,
DHCP-less, network adapter configuration. See 'Dynamic Con
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:01, you wrote:
> I _think_ the 169.254 network is a default one given when an interface
> cannot get its address via dhcp.
A whois enquiry on that address block refers one to RFC 3330 which says,
amongst other things:-
169.254.0.0/16 - This is the "link local" block. It is
I _think_ the 169.254 network is a default one given when an interface
cannot get its address via dhcp.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 12:09:20+1200
mjm159<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On an aside, I also can't understand why 169.254.0.0 keeps appearing
> in my route table. None of the interfaces are confi
Version numbers don't show by themselves whether the copy/paste problem
was some kind of bug or intended behaviour, and if it was a bug,
whether it has been fixed. Instead of going to the effort of putting up
screenshots (which don't have any extra value beyond giving a version
number), you could h
I suspect that it has been set up for dhcp, which you (apparently) are not
using (or have a dhcpd server running).
In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 you should have something like
the following.
DEVICE=eth1
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=x.x.x.x
NETMASK=y.y.y.y
ONBOOT=yes
Currently you mig
Okay, so I got it going mostly. I logically changed eth0 (which is never
plugged in to anything) with eth1. I just changed the modules.conf and
swapped the ifcfg scripts as well.
Now eth0 (formerly eth1) comes up with its IP and network info. However, I
can't understand why that made a diffe
42 matches
Mail list logo
